Navigating diverging responsibilities for inclusion in a biobased value chain: the case of Solaris tobacco in South Africa
Companies operating in international, cross-cultural settings encounter challenges in balancing their business roles with responsibilities towards inclusion. This delicate balance is particularly strained within the bioeconomy where uncertainties emerge. This study explores this novelty: how a compa...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Responsible Innovation |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23299460.2024.2414533 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841556130734538752 |
|---|---|
| author | Eefje De Gelder Lotte Asveld |
| author_facet | Eefje De Gelder Lotte Asveld |
| author_sort | Eefje De Gelder |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Companies operating in international, cross-cultural settings encounter challenges in balancing their business roles with responsibilities towards inclusion. This delicate balance is particularly strained within the bioeconomy where uncertainties emerge. This study explores this novelty: how a company engaging in an emerging biobased value chain can fulfil its moral obligations (i.e. responsibility) towards inclusion, aligning with the principles of beneficence (doing good) and non-maleficence (doing no harm). A case study was conducted in the South African Royal Bafokeng Nation where a biobased project, involving tobacco plant cultivation for foremost oil production, was initiated. Our findings suggest that companies in emerging biobased value chains must incorporate local stakeholders' knowledge when establishing their value chains. However, when the implications of beneficence in a specific context are ambiguous, companies should exercise caution in asserting positive responsibilities. Companies should empower local agents to achieve their objectives while refraining from imposing external norms on local contexts. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-eff71f01802944619a96736fdff36877 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2329-9460 2329-9037 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Responsible Innovation |
| spelling | doaj-art-eff71f01802944619a96736fdff368772025-01-07T13:48:20ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Responsible Innovation2329-94602329-90372024-12-0111110.1080/23299460.2024.2414533Navigating diverging responsibilities for inclusion in a biobased value chain: the case of Solaris tobacco in South AfricaEefje De Gelder0Lotte Asveld1Technische Universiteit Delft, Delft, The NetherlandsTechnische Universiteit Delft, Delft, The NetherlandsCompanies operating in international, cross-cultural settings encounter challenges in balancing their business roles with responsibilities towards inclusion. This delicate balance is particularly strained within the bioeconomy where uncertainties emerge. This study explores this novelty: how a company engaging in an emerging biobased value chain can fulfil its moral obligations (i.e. responsibility) towards inclusion, aligning with the principles of beneficence (doing good) and non-maleficence (doing no harm). A case study was conducted in the South African Royal Bafokeng Nation where a biobased project, involving tobacco plant cultivation for foremost oil production, was initiated. Our findings suggest that companies in emerging biobased value chains must incorporate local stakeholders' knowledge when establishing their value chains. However, when the implications of beneficence in a specific context are ambiguous, companies should exercise caution in asserting positive responsibilities. Companies should empower local agents to achieve their objectives while refraining from imposing external norms on local contexts.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23299460.2024.2414533Responsibilityinclusionbiobased value chainsuncertainties |
| spellingShingle | Eefje De Gelder Lotte Asveld Navigating diverging responsibilities for inclusion in a biobased value chain: the case of Solaris tobacco in South Africa Journal of Responsible Innovation Responsibility inclusion biobased value chains uncertainties |
| title | Navigating diverging responsibilities for inclusion in a biobased value chain: the case of Solaris tobacco in South Africa |
| title_full | Navigating diverging responsibilities for inclusion in a biobased value chain: the case of Solaris tobacco in South Africa |
| title_fullStr | Navigating diverging responsibilities for inclusion in a biobased value chain: the case of Solaris tobacco in South Africa |
| title_full_unstemmed | Navigating diverging responsibilities for inclusion in a biobased value chain: the case of Solaris tobacco in South Africa |
| title_short | Navigating diverging responsibilities for inclusion in a biobased value chain: the case of Solaris tobacco in South Africa |
| title_sort | navigating diverging responsibilities for inclusion in a biobased value chain the case of solaris tobacco in south africa |
| topic | Responsibility inclusion biobased value chains uncertainties |
| url | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23299460.2024.2414533 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT eefjedegelder navigatingdivergingresponsibilitiesforinclusioninabiobasedvaluechainthecaseofsolaristobaccoinsouthafrica AT lotteasveld navigatingdivergingresponsibilitiesforinclusioninabiobasedvaluechainthecaseofsolaristobaccoinsouthafrica |