Allograft to bone-tunnel integration in a canine anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction model: a comparison study of allograft preparation methods
Abstract The procedure of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) allograft preparation can be divided into fresh-frozen method (FF-allograft) or freeze-dried method (FD-allograft). This study aims to biomechanically and histologically compare the graft to bone tunnel integration between the two allografts...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2024-11-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05191-z |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Abstract The procedure of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) allograft preparation can be divided into fresh-frozen method (FF-allograft) or freeze-dried method (FD-allograft). This study aims to biomechanically and histologically compare the graft to bone tunnel integration between the two allografts. In-vitro results indicated that FF-allograft and FD-allograft showed excellent biocompatibility and biomechanics, while FD-allograft showed a denser collagen fiber arrangement than FF-allograft and autograft. Then, in-vivo preformation of the FF-allograft, FD-allograft, and autograft on bone tunnel integration was evaluated via a canine ACL reconstruction model. In-vivo results indicated that no signs of infection or osteoarthritis were shown in the femur-graft-tibia complexes, but more vascularity and synovitis formed around the implanted FF-allograft. Micro-computed tomography showed that peri-graft bone in the FF-allograft group was significantly increased and remodeled compared with the FD-allograft group; Histologically, the FF-allograft group exhibited similar graft-bone tunnel healing to the FD-allograft group. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining showed significantly more osteoclasts presented in the FD-allograft group compared to the FF-allograft group. Meanwhile, a significantly higher failure load was shown in the FF-allograft group when compared with the FD-allograft group (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the FF-allograft integrated more firmly into the bone tunnel than the FD-allograft when used in ACL reconstruction. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1749-799X |