COHESION ANALYSIS OF ISLAMIC READING TEXTBOOKS
There are many students of Islamic Education and Teacher Training Facultyof IAIN Walisongo Semarang who have complained that Islamic reading texts used by their teachers are hard for them to understand. I examine this issue by seeing some linguistic aspects of those reading texts. This Qualitative a...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
English Department of Antasari State Islamic University
2017-05-01
|
| Series: | LET: Linguistics, Literature and English Teaching Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id/index.php/let/article/view/1406 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841545621517893632 |
|---|---|
| author | Sayyidatul Fadlilah |
| author_facet | Sayyidatul Fadlilah |
| author_sort | Sayyidatul Fadlilah |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | There are many students of Islamic Education and Teacher Training Facultyof IAIN Walisongo Semarang who have complained that Islamic reading texts used by their teachers are hard for them to understand. I examine this issue by seeing some linguistic aspects of those reading texts. This Qualitative and Descriptive approach highlighted the types of grammatical and lexical cohesive devices and the realization of cohesiveness of those reading textsbased on Halliday and Hasan’s theory.The result of the study shows that the six reading texts (A.1, 2, 3; and B.1, 2, 3) stated in reading textbooks: English for Islamic Studies, English for Islamic Studies 2, Understanding Islam; for Islamic Studies; in terms of cohesion (following Halliday and Hasan’s principles of reading texts) respectively the average score of anaphoric references: 54.17% for text A.3, 53.85% for text B.2, 53.06% for text A.1, 48.57% for text B.3, 41.86% for text B.1, 33.33% for text A.3. After consulting to the Halliday and Hasan’s principles of cohesion of the reading texts (1989), that the most cohesive reading texts is text A.3, whereas the least cohesive one is Text A.2. Finally, these factors will assist lecturers and students in choosing the appropriate book for them.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-ee568619d5b74d4fbc047fc7db8da2f4 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2086-9606 2549-2454 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2017-05-01 |
| publisher | English Department of Antasari State Islamic University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | LET: Linguistics, Literature and English Teaching Journal |
| spelling | doaj-art-ee568619d5b74d4fbc047fc7db8da2f42025-01-12T00:47:56ZengEnglish Department of Antasari State Islamic UniversityLET: Linguistics, Literature and English Teaching Journal2086-96062549-24542017-05-014210.18592/let.v4i2.1406992COHESION ANALYSIS OF ISLAMIC READING TEXTBOOKSSayyidatul Fadlilah0IAIN Walisongo SemarangThere are many students of Islamic Education and Teacher Training Facultyof IAIN Walisongo Semarang who have complained that Islamic reading texts used by their teachers are hard for them to understand. I examine this issue by seeing some linguistic aspects of those reading texts. This Qualitative and Descriptive approach highlighted the types of grammatical and lexical cohesive devices and the realization of cohesiveness of those reading textsbased on Halliday and Hasan’s theory.The result of the study shows that the six reading texts (A.1, 2, 3; and B.1, 2, 3) stated in reading textbooks: English for Islamic Studies, English for Islamic Studies 2, Understanding Islam; for Islamic Studies; in terms of cohesion (following Halliday and Hasan’s principles of reading texts) respectively the average score of anaphoric references: 54.17% for text A.3, 53.85% for text B.2, 53.06% for text A.1, 48.57% for text B.3, 41.86% for text B.1, 33.33% for text A.3. After consulting to the Halliday and Hasan’s principles of cohesion of the reading texts (1989), that the most cohesive reading texts is text A.3, whereas the least cohesive one is Text A.2. Finally, these factors will assist lecturers and students in choosing the appropriate book for them. https://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id/index.php/let/article/view/1406CohesionA cohesive textReferenceAnaphoric Referenceand Exophoric Reference |
| spellingShingle | Sayyidatul Fadlilah COHESION ANALYSIS OF ISLAMIC READING TEXTBOOKS LET: Linguistics, Literature and English Teaching Journal Cohesion A cohesive text Reference Anaphoric Reference and Exophoric Reference |
| title | COHESION ANALYSIS OF ISLAMIC READING TEXTBOOKS |
| title_full | COHESION ANALYSIS OF ISLAMIC READING TEXTBOOKS |
| title_fullStr | COHESION ANALYSIS OF ISLAMIC READING TEXTBOOKS |
| title_full_unstemmed | COHESION ANALYSIS OF ISLAMIC READING TEXTBOOKS |
| title_short | COHESION ANALYSIS OF ISLAMIC READING TEXTBOOKS |
| title_sort | cohesion analysis of islamic reading textbooks |
| topic | Cohesion A cohesive text Reference Anaphoric Reference and Exophoric Reference |
| url | https://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id/index.php/let/article/view/1406 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sayyidatulfadlilah cohesionanalysisofislamicreadingtextbooks |