Contact Dermatitis and Chemical Sensitivity among Ceramics Workers

Background: Contact dermatitis comprises 90%–95% of occupational skin disease cases in the United States. Some of these cases occur in ceramics workers who are in direct and prolonged contact with clays, glazes, and pastes that may cause allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) and irritant contact dermati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rachel E. Tao, Jessica N. Pixley, Steven R. Feldman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2024-12-01
Series:Journal of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jdds.jdds_42_23
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841556610483224576
author Rachel E. Tao
Jessica N. Pixley
Steven R. Feldman
author_facet Rachel E. Tao
Jessica N. Pixley
Steven R. Feldman
author_sort Rachel E. Tao
collection DOAJ
description Background: Contact dermatitis comprises 90%–95% of occupational skin disease cases in the United States. Some of these cases occur in ceramics workers who are in direct and prolonged contact with clays, glazes, and pastes that may cause allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) and irritant contact dermatitis (ICD). Purpose: Our objective is to characterize the frequency of ACD and ICD among ceramics workers and to describe the culprit chemicals reported to cause chemical sensitization and positive patch test results. Methods: A literature review was performed in PubMed between February and July 2023 using the following keywords: “ceramics,” “potter,” “clay,” “eczema,” “hand dermatitis,” “atopic dermatitis,” and “glaze.” Twenty-seven articles were reviewed, of which nine were reports of contact dermatitis in ceramics workers written in English and were included in this review. The positive contactants were reviewed for presence in the ACDS Core Allergen Series and the T.R.U.E® Test series. Results: Of the 435 ceramics workers, 23% had active hand dermatitis. Of the ceramics workers with active hand dermatitis, 55% had ACD and 45% had ICD. Of the 52 sensitizing substances, 36 were not present in either of the two patch-testing series evaluated. Conclusion: In cases where potential culprit allergens may be difficult to identify for the purpose of patch testing, direct application of the clay body or glaze may be performed. Including these chemical allergens in routine patch testing series could facilitate better outcomes for ceramics workers with dermatitis.
format Article
id doaj-art-ed08d9b9c22e4edaa4e42d3ef43ee93d
institution Kabale University
issn 2352-2410
2352-2429
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery
spelling doaj-art-ed08d9b9c22e4edaa4e42d3ef43ee93d2025-01-07T06:53:11ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery2352-24102352-24292024-12-01282616410.4103/jdds.jdds_42_23Contact Dermatitis and Chemical Sensitivity among Ceramics WorkersRachel E. TaoJessica N. PixleySteven R. FeldmanBackground: Contact dermatitis comprises 90%–95% of occupational skin disease cases in the United States. Some of these cases occur in ceramics workers who are in direct and prolonged contact with clays, glazes, and pastes that may cause allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) and irritant contact dermatitis (ICD). Purpose: Our objective is to characterize the frequency of ACD and ICD among ceramics workers and to describe the culprit chemicals reported to cause chemical sensitization and positive patch test results. Methods: A literature review was performed in PubMed between February and July 2023 using the following keywords: “ceramics,” “potter,” “clay,” “eczema,” “hand dermatitis,” “atopic dermatitis,” and “glaze.” Twenty-seven articles were reviewed, of which nine were reports of contact dermatitis in ceramics workers written in English and were included in this review. The positive contactants were reviewed for presence in the ACDS Core Allergen Series and the T.R.U.E® Test series. Results: Of the 435 ceramics workers, 23% had active hand dermatitis. Of the ceramics workers with active hand dermatitis, 55% had ACD and 45% had ICD. Of the 52 sensitizing substances, 36 were not present in either of the two patch-testing series evaluated. Conclusion: In cases where potential culprit allergens may be difficult to identify for the purpose of patch testing, direct application of the clay body or glaze may be performed. Including these chemical allergens in routine patch testing series could facilitate better outcomes for ceramics workers with dermatitis.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jdds.jdds_42_23ceramicschemical sensitivitycontact dermatitisdermatology
spellingShingle Rachel E. Tao
Jessica N. Pixley
Steven R. Feldman
Contact Dermatitis and Chemical Sensitivity among Ceramics Workers
Journal of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery
ceramics
chemical sensitivity
contact dermatitis
dermatology
title Contact Dermatitis and Chemical Sensitivity among Ceramics Workers
title_full Contact Dermatitis and Chemical Sensitivity among Ceramics Workers
title_fullStr Contact Dermatitis and Chemical Sensitivity among Ceramics Workers
title_full_unstemmed Contact Dermatitis and Chemical Sensitivity among Ceramics Workers
title_short Contact Dermatitis and Chemical Sensitivity among Ceramics Workers
title_sort contact dermatitis and chemical sensitivity among ceramics workers
topic ceramics
chemical sensitivity
contact dermatitis
dermatology
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jdds.jdds_42_23
work_keys_str_mv AT racheletao contactdermatitisandchemicalsensitivityamongceramicsworkers
AT jessicanpixley contactdermatitisandchemicalsensitivityamongceramicsworkers
AT stevenrfeldman contactdermatitisandchemicalsensitivityamongceramicsworkers