Tissue damage between barbed suture and conventional sutures in animal laboratory model using scanning electron microscopy
This study aimed to compare the tissue damage caused by barbed sutures and conventional sutures using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Porcine myocardium was incised and sutured using different thread types: barbed suture, (STRATAFIX® Spiral PDS PLUS) and conventional sutures, (VICRYL® and PDS Pl...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/01443615.2024.2370973 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841553190116392960 |
|---|---|
| author | Tomomi Shiga Hideshi Okada Masanori Isobe Tatsuro Furui |
| author_facet | Tomomi Shiga Hideshi Okada Masanori Isobe Tatsuro Furui |
| author_sort | Tomomi Shiga |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This study aimed to compare the tissue damage caused by barbed sutures and conventional sutures using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Porcine myocardium was incised and sutured using different thread types: barbed suture, (STRATAFIX® Spiral PDS PLUS) and conventional sutures, (VICRYL® and PDS Plus®). Needle hole shapes were examined at magnifications of 30×–100×. VICRYL® suture damaged the tissue and created large gaps around the needle holes. The tissue around the needle holes was smoother and less damaged in the single suture ligations with PDS®; however, a large gap had formed. In the continuous suture with STRATAFIX®, the tissue around the needle holes was significantly smoother and minimally damaged, with no noticeable gaps around the needle holes. Barbed sutures reduced the load on needle holes and minimised tissue damage owing to the dispersion of traction forces by the barbs compared with conventional sutures. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-ec95e2663efb4ea09117d60c4fdc2b7c |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 0144-3615 1364-6893 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology |
| spelling | doaj-art-ec95e2663efb4ea09117d60c4fdc2b7c2025-01-09T12:13:17ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology0144-36151364-68932024-12-0144110.1080/01443615.2024.2370973Tissue damage between barbed suture and conventional sutures in animal laboratory model using scanning electron microscopyTomomi Shiga0Hideshi Okada1Masanori Isobe2Tatsuro Furui3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu City, JapanDepartment of Emergency and Disaster Medicine, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu City, JapanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu City, JapanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu City, JapanThis study aimed to compare the tissue damage caused by barbed sutures and conventional sutures using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Porcine myocardium was incised and sutured using different thread types: barbed suture, (STRATAFIX® Spiral PDS PLUS) and conventional sutures, (VICRYL® and PDS Plus®). Needle hole shapes were examined at magnifications of 30×–100×. VICRYL® suture damaged the tissue and created large gaps around the needle holes. The tissue around the needle holes was smoother and less damaged in the single suture ligations with PDS®; however, a large gap had formed. In the continuous suture with STRATAFIX®, the tissue around the needle holes was significantly smoother and minimally damaged, with no noticeable gaps around the needle holes. Barbed sutures reduced the load on needle holes and minimised tissue damage owing to the dispersion of traction forces by the barbs compared with conventional sutures.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/01443615.2024.2370973Barbed suturescanning electron microscopytissue damage |
| spellingShingle | Tomomi Shiga Hideshi Okada Masanori Isobe Tatsuro Furui Tissue damage between barbed suture and conventional sutures in animal laboratory model using scanning electron microscopy Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Barbed suture scanning electron microscopy tissue damage |
| title | Tissue damage between barbed suture and conventional sutures in animal laboratory model using scanning electron microscopy |
| title_full | Tissue damage between barbed suture and conventional sutures in animal laboratory model using scanning electron microscopy |
| title_fullStr | Tissue damage between barbed suture and conventional sutures in animal laboratory model using scanning electron microscopy |
| title_full_unstemmed | Tissue damage between barbed suture and conventional sutures in animal laboratory model using scanning electron microscopy |
| title_short | Tissue damage between barbed suture and conventional sutures in animal laboratory model using scanning electron microscopy |
| title_sort | tissue damage between barbed suture and conventional sutures in animal laboratory model using scanning electron microscopy |
| topic | Barbed suture scanning electron microscopy tissue damage |
| url | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/01443615.2024.2370973 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT tomomishiga tissuedamagebetweenbarbedsutureandconventionalsuturesinanimallaboratorymodelusingscanningelectronmicroscopy AT hideshiokada tissuedamagebetweenbarbedsutureandconventionalsuturesinanimallaboratorymodelusingscanningelectronmicroscopy AT masanoriisobe tissuedamagebetweenbarbedsutureandconventionalsuturesinanimallaboratorymodelusingscanningelectronmicroscopy AT tatsurofurui tissuedamagebetweenbarbedsutureandconventionalsuturesinanimallaboratorymodelusingscanningelectronmicroscopy |