The incorrect conclusion about vaginally administered progesterone: when a randomized clinical trial gets it wrong

The incorrect conclusion about vaginally administered progesterone: when a randomized clinical trial gets it wrong

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Richard J. Paulson, M.D., M.S.
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Elsevier 2024-12-01
Series:	F&S Reports
Online Access:	http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666334124001223
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

When Data Science Goes Wrong: How Misconceptions About Data Capture and Processing Causes Wrong Conclusions
by: Peter Christen, et al.
Published: (2024-02-01)

Getting democracy wrong
by: Gwendolyn Blue, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01)

Sexual Absorption of Vaginal Progesterone: A Randomized Control Trial
by: Kathryn S. Merriam, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)

Comparison of the efficacy of vaginal micronised progesterone tablet and gel for in vitro fertilisation
by: Soo Jin Han, et al.
Published: (2025-12-01)

Risk and Crisis Communication: When Things Go Wrong
by: Ricky Telg
Published: (2010-09-01)

Risk and Crisis Communication: When Things Go Wrong
by: Ricky Telg
Published: (2010-09-01)

Comparison of Individualized Rescue Luteal Phase Support Strategies with Vaginal and Combined Vaginal & Subcutaneous Progesterone Administration in Artificial Frozen-Thawed Blastocyst Embryo Transfer Cycles Based on Serum Progesterone levels
by: Secil Irem Arik Alpcetin, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01)

Comparison of pregnancy outcome after adding oral or intramuscular progesterone to vaginal progesterone in frozen embryo transfer: A cross-sectional study
by: Sahereh Arabian, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01)

Incorrect use of meta-analytic procedures
by: Pooja Shatadal, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01)

When Should Naloxone Be Administered to the Undifferentiated Unresponsive Person?
Published: (2018-08-01)

Pilot PET study of vaginally administered bioadhesive nanoparticles in cynomolgus monkeys: Kinetics and safety evaluation
by: Molly K. Grun, et al.
Published: (2024-09-01)

Is oral dydrogesterone equivalent to vaginal micronized progesterone for luteal phase support in women receiving oocyte donation?
by: Margaux Lorillon, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01)

Comparison of vaginal versus intramuscular progesterone in programmed cycles for frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer in patients with endometriosis
by: Ziqi Jin, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01)

Incorrectly accounting for preference heterogeneity in choice experiments: Implications for welfare measurement
by: Catalina M. Torres, et al.
Published: (2014-12-01)

Wrong incisions
by: David V Feliciano
Published: (2022-10-01)

Surrogate safety evaluation of incorrect pedestrian detection at signalized intersections
by: Slavica Gavric, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01)

Lakes restoration: analysis of terminology incorrectly used in the scientific literature
by: Robert Mazur
Published: (2019-06-01)

Evaluation of two luteal support regimens, intramuscular progesterone and progesterone vaginal gel, for vitrified-warmed embryo transfer in women with chronic salpingitis: a single-center 8-year retrospective study
by: Li Yu, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01)

Effectiveness of combined vaginal progesterone and cervical cerclage in preventing preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
by: Rosanna C Diacci, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01)

When It Comes to Stewardship, It’S Time to Get with the Programmers
by: Elizabeth CT Parfitt, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)

When AI goes wrong: Fatal errors in oncological research reviewing assistance Open AI based
by: Marwan Al-Raeei
Published: (2024-06-01)

The taxation of the Corporate Income Tax of disposal of goods from deposit incorrect
by: Artur Halasz
Published: (2016-09-01)

Incorrect arguments of scientific discourse in pedagogical texts, or samples for non-imitation
by: A. V. Korzhuev, et al.
Published: (2024-02-01)

Oral dydrogesterone along with vaginal micronized progesterone supplementation for luteal phase support in IVF patients, and its impact on pregnancy and live birth rates: a prospective randomized trial
by: Leonardo Rinaldi, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01)

Hitting children is wrong
by: Tony Waterston, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01)

Conclusions
by: Christiane Raynaud
Published: (2021-04-01)

Conclusión
by: Michel Garcia
Published: (1999-10-01)

Conclusions
by: François Trémolières
Published: (2013-02-01)

Conclusion
by: Sandy Maillard, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01)

Conclusion
by: Cédric Baecher
Published: (2025-01-01)

Conclusion
by: Michel Biard
Published: (2005-01-01)

New Plants for Florida: Conclusion
by: Richard L. Jones, et al.
Published: (2003-08-01)

New Plants for Florida: Conclusion
by: Richard L. Jones, et al.
Published: (2003-08-01)

EFFECT OF CLEARANCE THE BALL BEARINGS ON INCORRECT WORK OF THREE-SUPORT BEARING SHAFT
by: Jarosław KACZOR
Published: (2014-06-01)

Patiromer Does Not Alter Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics in Kidney Transplant Recipients When Administered Three Hours Post–Tacrolimus
by: Ole Martin Drevland, MSc, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01)

The rights and wrongs of private schooling
by: John White
Published: (2023-09-01)

Gender identity with the wrong name.
by: Gina Cabeza Monroy
Published: (2015-07-01)

Post‐Artesunate Delayed Hemolysis: Anything That Can Go Wrong Will Go Wrong—Murphy's Law
by: Beliza Chemutai, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01)

Conclusion générale
by: Olivier Milhaud
Published: (2020-09-01)

Getting the Most out of Social Media: Strategic Practices When Using Social Media
by: Caroline R. Warwick, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01)