Contactless and continuous monitoring of respiratory rate in a hospital ward: a clinical validation study
IntroductionContinuous monitoring of respiratory rate in hospital wards can provide early detection of clinical deterioration, thereby reducing mortality, reducing transfers to intensive care units, and reducing the hospital length of stay. Despite the advantages of continuous monitoring, manually c...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2024-11-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Physiology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2024.1502413/full |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1846151728139862016 |
---|---|
author | Ståle Toften Jonas T. Kjellstadli Jørn Kværness Line Pedersen Line Pedersen Lars E. Laugsand Lars E. Laugsand Ole K. F. Thu Ole K. F. Thu |
author_facet | Ståle Toften Jonas T. Kjellstadli Jørn Kværness Line Pedersen Line Pedersen Lars E. Laugsand Lars E. Laugsand Ole K. F. Thu Ole K. F. Thu |
author_sort | Ståle Toften |
collection | DOAJ |
description | IntroductionContinuous monitoring of respiratory rate in hospital wards can provide early detection of clinical deterioration, thereby reducing mortality, reducing transfers to intensive care units, and reducing the hospital length of stay. Despite the advantages of continuous monitoring, manually counting every 1–12 h remains the standard of care in most hospital wards. The objective of this study was to validate continuous respiratory rate measurements from a radar-based contactless patient monitor [Vitalthings Guardian M10 (Vitalthings AS, Norway)] in a hospital ward.MethodsAn observational study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT06083272) was conducted at the emergency ward of a university hospital. Adult patients were monitored during rest with Vitalthings Guardian M10 in both a stationary and mobile configuration simultaneously with a reference device [Nox T3s (Nox Medical, Alpharetta, GA, United States)]. The agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement. The sensitivity and specificity of clinical alarms were evaluated using a Clarke Error grid modified for continuous monitoring of respiratory rate. Clinical aspects were further evaluated in terms of trend analysis and examination of gaps between valid measurements.Results32 patients were monitored for a median duration of 42 min [IQR (range) 35–46 (30–59 min)]. The bias was 0.1 and 0.0 breaths min−1 and the 95% limits of agreement ranged from −1.1 to 1.2 and −1.1 to 1.1 breaths min−1 for the stationary and mobile configuration, respectively. The concordances for trends were 96%. No clinical alarms were missed, and no false alarms or technical alarms were generated. No interval without a valid measurement was longer than 5 min.ConclusionVitalthings Guardian M10 measured respiratory rate accurately and continuously in resting patients in a hospital ward. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-ec1819fc7d644d2e8f1e28c671883a25 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1664-042X |
language | English |
publishDate | 2024-11-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Physiology |
spelling | doaj-art-ec1819fc7d644d2e8f1e28c671883a252024-11-27T06:32:58ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physiology1664-042X2024-11-011510.3389/fphys.2024.15024131502413Contactless and continuous monitoring of respiratory rate in a hospital ward: a clinical validation studyStåle Toften0Jonas T. Kjellstadli1Jørn Kværness2Line Pedersen3Line Pedersen4Lars E. Laugsand5Lars E. Laugsand6Ole K. F. Thu7Ole K. F. Thu8Department of Research and Data Science, Vitalthings AS, Trondheim, NorwayDepartment of Research and Data Science, Vitalthings AS, Trondheim, NorwayGod Klinisk Forskning, Oppdal, NorwayDepartment for Pain and Complex Disorders, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, NorwayDepartment of Circulation and Medical imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, NorwayDepartment of Circulation and Medical imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, NorwayEmergency Department, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, NorwayVitalthings AS, Trondheim, NorwayDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, NorwayIntroductionContinuous monitoring of respiratory rate in hospital wards can provide early detection of clinical deterioration, thereby reducing mortality, reducing transfers to intensive care units, and reducing the hospital length of stay. Despite the advantages of continuous monitoring, manually counting every 1–12 h remains the standard of care in most hospital wards. The objective of this study was to validate continuous respiratory rate measurements from a radar-based contactless patient monitor [Vitalthings Guardian M10 (Vitalthings AS, Norway)] in a hospital ward.MethodsAn observational study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT06083272) was conducted at the emergency ward of a university hospital. Adult patients were monitored during rest with Vitalthings Guardian M10 in both a stationary and mobile configuration simultaneously with a reference device [Nox T3s (Nox Medical, Alpharetta, GA, United States)]. The agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement. The sensitivity and specificity of clinical alarms were evaluated using a Clarke Error grid modified for continuous monitoring of respiratory rate. Clinical aspects were further evaluated in terms of trend analysis and examination of gaps between valid measurements.Results32 patients were monitored for a median duration of 42 min [IQR (range) 35–46 (30–59 min)]. The bias was 0.1 and 0.0 breaths min−1 and the 95% limits of agreement ranged from −1.1 to 1.2 and −1.1 to 1.1 breaths min−1 for the stationary and mobile configuration, respectively. The concordances for trends were 96%. No clinical alarms were missed, and no false alarms or technical alarms were generated. No interval without a valid measurement was longer than 5 min.ConclusionVitalthings Guardian M10 measured respiratory rate accurately and continuously in resting patients in a hospital ward.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2024.1502413/fullcontactless monitoringcontinuous monitoringmonitoringrespiratory ratehospitalclinical deterioration |
spellingShingle | Ståle Toften Jonas T. Kjellstadli Jørn Kværness Line Pedersen Line Pedersen Lars E. Laugsand Lars E. Laugsand Ole K. F. Thu Ole K. F. Thu Contactless and continuous monitoring of respiratory rate in a hospital ward: a clinical validation study Frontiers in Physiology contactless monitoring continuous monitoring monitoring respiratory rate hospital clinical deterioration |
title | Contactless and continuous monitoring of respiratory rate in a hospital ward: a clinical validation study |
title_full | Contactless and continuous monitoring of respiratory rate in a hospital ward: a clinical validation study |
title_fullStr | Contactless and continuous monitoring of respiratory rate in a hospital ward: a clinical validation study |
title_full_unstemmed | Contactless and continuous monitoring of respiratory rate in a hospital ward: a clinical validation study |
title_short | Contactless and continuous monitoring of respiratory rate in a hospital ward: a clinical validation study |
title_sort | contactless and continuous monitoring of respiratory rate in a hospital ward a clinical validation study |
topic | contactless monitoring continuous monitoring monitoring respiratory rate hospital clinical deterioration |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2024.1502413/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT staletoften contactlessandcontinuousmonitoringofrespiratoryrateinahospitalwardaclinicalvalidationstudy AT jonastkjellstadli contactlessandcontinuousmonitoringofrespiratoryrateinahospitalwardaclinicalvalidationstudy AT jørnkværness contactlessandcontinuousmonitoringofrespiratoryrateinahospitalwardaclinicalvalidationstudy AT linepedersen contactlessandcontinuousmonitoringofrespiratoryrateinahospitalwardaclinicalvalidationstudy AT linepedersen contactlessandcontinuousmonitoringofrespiratoryrateinahospitalwardaclinicalvalidationstudy AT larselaugsand contactlessandcontinuousmonitoringofrespiratoryrateinahospitalwardaclinicalvalidationstudy AT larselaugsand contactlessandcontinuousmonitoringofrespiratoryrateinahospitalwardaclinicalvalidationstudy AT olekfthu contactlessandcontinuousmonitoringofrespiratoryrateinahospitalwardaclinicalvalidationstudy AT olekfthu contactlessandcontinuousmonitoringofrespiratoryrateinahospitalwardaclinicalvalidationstudy |