Analysis of the clinical efficacy and safety of anti‐PD‐1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer

Abstract Objective To analyze the efficacy and adverse effects of anti‐PD‐1 immune checkpoint inhibitors aimed at nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods During the first stage of the study, using 40 patients with stage III/IVa NPC treated with anti‐PD‐1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shuling Shi, Bingyan Li, Pengcheng Zhou, Linhui Chen, Huizhen Li, Yingyi Wang, Xiaoyu Deng, Qianqian Dang, Jingjing Wu, Boya Zha, Peihong Li, Yingjuan Zheng, Daoke Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-07-01
Series:Cancer Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.7359
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846115493438554112
author Shuling Shi
Bingyan Li
Pengcheng Zhou
Linhui Chen
Huizhen Li
Yingyi Wang
Xiaoyu Deng
Qianqian Dang
Jingjing Wu
Boya Zha
Peihong Li
Yingjuan Zheng
Daoke Yang
author_facet Shuling Shi
Bingyan Li
Pengcheng Zhou
Linhui Chen
Huizhen Li
Yingyi Wang
Xiaoyu Deng
Qianqian Dang
Jingjing Wu
Boya Zha
Peihong Li
Yingjuan Zheng
Daoke Yang
author_sort Shuling Shi
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective To analyze the efficacy and adverse effects of anti‐PD‐1 immune checkpoint inhibitors aimed at nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods During the first stage of the study, using 40 patients with stage III/IVa NPC treated with anti‐PD‐1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemoradiotherapy as a first‐line treatment (observation group) and 70 patients with NPC treated with chemoradiotherapy alone (control group). In the second stage of the study, 88 patients with NPC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors were grouped according to the number of lines of immunotherapy, the number of times, and the types of application. Results Observation of the short‐term effects in the first stage indicated that the objective response rate (ORR) of the observation group and the control group against primary foci of NPC was 75.0% versus 40.0%; the mortality rate of the observation group was much lower than that of the control group. The overall first‐line treatment evaluation of the observation vs. control groups were as follows: ORR (67.5% vs. 38.6%); median PFS (17.52 vs. 17.21 months); and median OS (18.68 vs. 18.14 months), respectively (p < 0.05). The second stage of the study had an ORR of 53.4%, and the efficacy of immunotherapy was related to staging, timing, and frequency. Conclusion Anti‐PD‐1 immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemoradiotherapy as the first‐line treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma may improve patient outcomes significantly. Timing, frequency, and the type of immunotherapy exerted an effect on the efficacy of immunotherapy. Adverse effects that occurred during treatment were tolerable and controllable.
format Article
id doaj-art-eb1bcefdabd34e0c98f940afcf24f7a5
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-7634
language English
publishDate 2024-07-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cancer Medicine
spelling doaj-art-eb1bcefdabd34e0c98f940afcf24f7a52024-12-19T12:33:08ZengWileyCancer Medicine2045-76342024-07-011314n/an/a10.1002/cam4.7359Analysis of the clinical efficacy and safety of anti‐PD‐1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancerShuling Shi0Bingyan Li1Pengcheng Zhou2Linhui Chen3Huizhen Li4Yingyi Wang5Xiaoyu Deng6Qianqian DangJingjing Wu7Boya Zha8Peihong Li9Yingjuan Zheng10Daoke Yang11Department of Radiation Oncology The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou Henan ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou Henan ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou Henan ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou Henan ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou Henan ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou Henan ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou Henan ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou Henan ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou Henan ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou Henan ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou Henan ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou Henan ChinaAbstract Objective To analyze the efficacy and adverse effects of anti‐PD‐1 immune checkpoint inhibitors aimed at nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods During the first stage of the study, using 40 patients with stage III/IVa NPC treated with anti‐PD‐1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemoradiotherapy as a first‐line treatment (observation group) and 70 patients with NPC treated with chemoradiotherapy alone (control group). In the second stage of the study, 88 patients with NPC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors were grouped according to the number of lines of immunotherapy, the number of times, and the types of application. Results Observation of the short‐term effects in the first stage indicated that the objective response rate (ORR) of the observation group and the control group against primary foci of NPC was 75.0% versus 40.0%; the mortality rate of the observation group was much lower than that of the control group. The overall first‐line treatment evaluation of the observation vs. control groups were as follows: ORR (67.5% vs. 38.6%); median PFS (17.52 vs. 17.21 months); and median OS (18.68 vs. 18.14 months), respectively (p < 0.05). The second stage of the study had an ORR of 53.4%, and the efficacy of immunotherapy was related to staging, timing, and frequency. Conclusion Anti‐PD‐1 immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemoradiotherapy as the first‐line treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma may improve patient outcomes significantly. Timing, frequency, and the type of immunotherapy exerted an effect on the efficacy of immunotherapy. Adverse effects that occurred during treatment were tolerable and controllable.https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.7359immune checkpoint inhibitorsimmune‐related adverse eventsnasopharyngeal cancerPD‐1
spellingShingle Shuling Shi
Bingyan Li
Pengcheng Zhou
Linhui Chen
Huizhen Li
Yingyi Wang
Xiaoyu Deng
Qianqian Dang
Jingjing Wu
Boya Zha
Peihong Li
Yingjuan Zheng
Daoke Yang
Analysis of the clinical efficacy and safety of anti‐PD‐1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer
Cancer Medicine
immune checkpoint inhibitors
immune‐related adverse events
nasopharyngeal cancer
PD‐1
title Analysis of the clinical efficacy and safety of anti‐PD‐1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer
title_full Analysis of the clinical efficacy and safety of anti‐PD‐1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer
title_fullStr Analysis of the clinical efficacy and safety of anti‐PD‐1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the clinical efficacy and safety of anti‐PD‐1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer
title_short Analysis of the clinical efficacy and safety of anti‐PD‐1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer
title_sort analysis of the clinical efficacy and safety of anti pd 1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer
topic immune checkpoint inhibitors
immune‐related adverse events
nasopharyngeal cancer
PD‐1
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.7359
work_keys_str_mv AT shulingshi analysisoftheclinicalefficacyandsafetyofantipd1immunecheckpointinhibitorsinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcancer
AT bingyanli analysisoftheclinicalefficacyandsafetyofantipd1immunecheckpointinhibitorsinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcancer
AT pengchengzhou analysisoftheclinicalefficacyandsafetyofantipd1immunecheckpointinhibitorsinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcancer
AT linhuichen analysisoftheclinicalefficacyandsafetyofantipd1immunecheckpointinhibitorsinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcancer
AT huizhenli analysisoftheclinicalefficacyandsafetyofantipd1immunecheckpointinhibitorsinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcancer
AT yingyiwang analysisoftheclinicalefficacyandsafetyofantipd1immunecheckpointinhibitorsinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcancer
AT xiaoyudeng analysisoftheclinicalefficacyandsafetyofantipd1immunecheckpointinhibitorsinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcancer
AT qianqiandang analysisoftheclinicalefficacyandsafetyofantipd1immunecheckpointinhibitorsinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcancer
AT jingjingwu analysisoftheclinicalefficacyandsafetyofantipd1immunecheckpointinhibitorsinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcancer
AT boyazha analysisoftheclinicalefficacyandsafetyofantipd1immunecheckpointinhibitorsinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcancer
AT peihongli analysisoftheclinicalefficacyandsafetyofantipd1immunecheckpointinhibitorsinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcancer
AT yingjuanzheng analysisoftheclinicalefficacyandsafetyofantipd1immunecheckpointinhibitorsinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcancer
AT daokeyang analysisoftheclinicalefficacyandsafetyofantipd1immunecheckpointinhibitorsinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcancer