Is there a relationship between the urinary iodine of pregnant and diabetic patients?

Objectives: We investigated the iodine status in this study in pregnant women, diabetic women–men, and nondiabetic men–women living in our region. Methods: A total of 385 cases who applied to the endocrine clinic between 2015 and 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. The gender, age, free T3 (pg/ml),...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mine Öztürk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2023-06-01
Series:Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_270_21
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846170866342166528
author Mine Öztürk
author_facet Mine Öztürk
author_sort Mine Öztürk
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: We investigated the iodine status in this study in pregnant women, diabetic women–men, and nondiabetic men–women living in our region. Methods: A total of 385 cases who applied to the endocrine clinic between 2015 and 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. The gender, age, free T3 (pg/ml), free T4 (ng/dl), TSH (μIU/mL), anti-TPO antibody (IU/ml), anti-thyroglobulin antibody (IU/ml), and random urine iodine concentration (μg/L) levels of cases were recorded. The cases were grouped as pregnant, female, male, diabetic female, and diabetic male. Cases with overt thyroid disease, heart failure, liver failure, and kidney failure were excluded. Results: There were 6.75% (n = 26) pregnant, 54.8% (n = 211) nondiabetic female patients, 18.9% (n = 73) diabetic female patients, 12.7% (n = 49) nondiabetic male, and 4.15% (n = 16) diabetic male patients. The random urinary iodine level was significantly higher in nondiabetic women (112.9 ± 77.21) and diabetic women (140.7 ± 97.8) than in pregnant women (77.8 ± 31.8) (P = 0.00 and P = 0.03). There was no significant relationship between random urine levels of pregnant women and nondiabetic men (104.1 ± 82.6) (P = 0.16). The random urinary iodine level was significantly higher in diabetic men (170.0 ± 112.1) than in pregnant women (P = 0.00). Conclusions: In our region (xxx Region), pregnant women had iodine deficiency. The iodine level in men and women was very close to the lower limit. The urinary iodine level was higher in diabetic women and diabetic men than in both pregnant women and nondiabetic women and nondiabetic men. The results brought us the question: Could the high spot urinary iodine level in diabetic patients be a clue to nephropathy?
format Article
id doaj-art-eae4625e794c49b19db7958eb5a4b56b
institution Kabale University
issn 2249-4863
2278-7135
language English
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
spelling doaj-art-eae4625e794c49b19db7958eb5a4b56b2024-11-11T11:08:01ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Family Medicine and Primary Care2249-48632278-71352023-06-011261083108610.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_270_21Is there a relationship between the urinary iodine of pregnant and diabetic patients?Mine ÖztürkObjectives: We investigated the iodine status in this study in pregnant women, diabetic women–men, and nondiabetic men–women living in our region. Methods: A total of 385 cases who applied to the endocrine clinic between 2015 and 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. The gender, age, free T3 (pg/ml), free T4 (ng/dl), TSH (μIU/mL), anti-TPO antibody (IU/ml), anti-thyroglobulin antibody (IU/ml), and random urine iodine concentration (μg/L) levels of cases were recorded. The cases were grouped as pregnant, female, male, diabetic female, and diabetic male. Cases with overt thyroid disease, heart failure, liver failure, and kidney failure were excluded. Results: There were 6.75% (n = 26) pregnant, 54.8% (n = 211) nondiabetic female patients, 18.9% (n = 73) diabetic female patients, 12.7% (n = 49) nondiabetic male, and 4.15% (n = 16) diabetic male patients. The random urinary iodine level was significantly higher in nondiabetic women (112.9 ± 77.21) and diabetic women (140.7 ± 97.8) than in pregnant women (77.8 ± 31.8) (P = 0.00 and P = 0.03). There was no significant relationship between random urine levels of pregnant women and nondiabetic men (104.1 ± 82.6) (P = 0.16). The random urinary iodine level was significantly higher in diabetic men (170.0 ± 112.1) than in pregnant women (P = 0.00). Conclusions: In our region (xxx Region), pregnant women had iodine deficiency. The iodine level in men and women was very close to the lower limit. The urinary iodine level was higher in diabetic women and diabetic men than in both pregnant women and nondiabetic women and nondiabetic men. The results brought us the question: Could the high spot urinary iodine level in diabetic patients be a clue to nephropathy?https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_270_21diabetic mendiabetic womenpregnanturinary iodine
spellingShingle Mine Öztürk
Is there a relationship between the urinary iodine of pregnant and diabetic patients?
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
diabetic men
diabetic women
pregnant
urinary iodine
title Is there a relationship between the urinary iodine of pregnant and diabetic patients?
title_full Is there a relationship between the urinary iodine of pregnant and diabetic patients?
title_fullStr Is there a relationship between the urinary iodine of pregnant and diabetic patients?
title_full_unstemmed Is there a relationship between the urinary iodine of pregnant and diabetic patients?
title_short Is there a relationship between the urinary iodine of pregnant and diabetic patients?
title_sort is there a relationship between the urinary iodine of pregnant and diabetic patients
topic diabetic men
diabetic women
pregnant
urinary iodine
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_270_21
work_keys_str_mv AT mineozturk istherearelationshipbetweentheurinaryiodineofpregnantanddiabeticpatients