Insertion and use of multicriteria methods for neutrosophic judicial evaluation
This study addresses the growing need to integrate multicriteria methods into judicial evaluation, specifically through a neutrosophic approach, to improve the accuracy and reliability of legal decision-making. Today, the judicial system faces critical challenges related to the interpretation of evi...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of New Mexico
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Neutrosophic Sets and Systems |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://fs.unm.edu/NSS/33multicriteriamethods.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849228972687097856 |
|---|---|
| author | Roberto Carlos Jiménez Martinez María José Calderón Velásquez Manuel Augusto Suarez Albiñol Yusleidy Marlie Gordo Gómez |
| author_facet | Roberto Carlos Jiménez Martinez María José Calderón Velásquez Manuel Augusto Suarez Albiñol Yusleidy Marlie Gordo Gómez |
| author_sort | Roberto Carlos Jiménez Martinez |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This study addresses the growing need to integrate multicriteria methods into judicial evaluation, specifically through a neutrosophic approach, to improve the accuracy and reliability of legal decision-making. Today, the judicial system faces critical challenges related to the interpretation of evidence, the consideration of multiple factors, and the uncertainty inherent in complex cases. Although various approaches have been used in judicial evaluation, few effectively address the ambiguity and indeterminacy present in the opinions of judges and experts, leading to fragmented or biased analysis. This study seeks to close that gap by applying neutrosophic multicriteria methods, which allow for a more balanced and comprehensive evaluation, incorporating all dimensions of the judicial process, from evidence to contextual factors. The methodological approach adopted is based on the use of neutrosophic multicriteria tools, which allow for the integration and analysis of various criteria through a flexible and robust framework. The results obtained reveal that this method not only improves the accuracy of judicial assessments but also provides a clearer view of the uncertainty associated with legal decisions. The main theoretical implications of this study lie in the possibility of applying a neutrosophic framework to judicial assessment, providing a tool capable of capturing the complexity of disputed cases. On a practical level, the findings are crucial for the development of judicial decision support systems, suggesting that the implementation of this approach could contribute to greater objectivity and consistency in judicial decisions, as well as to an improvement in the transparency of the judicial process. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-ea5e0a8870fb4b848e08992357efb692 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2331-6055 2331-608X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | University of New Mexico |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Neutrosophic Sets and Systems |
| spelling | doaj-art-ea5e0a8870fb4b848e08992357efb6922025-08-22T11:29:02ZengUniversity of New MexicoNeutrosophic Sets and Systems2331-60552331-608X2024-12-017438539210.5281/zenodo.14419861Insertion and use of multicriteria methods for neutrosophic judicial evaluationRoberto Carlos Jiménez MartinezMaría José Calderón VelásquezManuel Augusto Suarez AlbiñolYusleidy Marlie Gordo GómezThis study addresses the growing need to integrate multicriteria methods into judicial evaluation, specifically through a neutrosophic approach, to improve the accuracy and reliability of legal decision-making. Today, the judicial system faces critical challenges related to the interpretation of evidence, the consideration of multiple factors, and the uncertainty inherent in complex cases. Although various approaches have been used in judicial evaluation, few effectively address the ambiguity and indeterminacy present in the opinions of judges and experts, leading to fragmented or biased analysis. This study seeks to close that gap by applying neutrosophic multicriteria methods, which allow for a more balanced and comprehensive evaluation, incorporating all dimensions of the judicial process, from evidence to contextual factors. The methodological approach adopted is based on the use of neutrosophic multicriteria tools, which allow for the integration and analysis of various criteria through a flexible and robust framework. The results obtained reveal that this method not only improves the accuracy of judicial assessments but also provides a clearer view of the uncertainty associated with legal decisions. The main theoretical implications of this study lie in the possibility of applying a neutrosophic framework to judicial assessment, providing a tool capable of capturing the complexity of disputed cases. On a practical level, the findings are crucial for the development of judicial decision support systems, suggesting that the implementation of this approach could contribute to greater objectivity and consistency in judicial decisions, as well as to an improvement in the transparency of the judicial process.https://fs.unm.edu/NSS/33multicriteriamethods.pdfmulticriteria methodsjudicial evaluationneutrosophyjudicial decision-makinguncertaintyevidence analysissupport systems |
| spellingShingle | Roberto Carlos Jiménez Martinez María José Calderón Velásquez Manuel Augusto Suarez Albiñol Yusleidy Marlie Gordo Gómez Insertion and use of multicriteria methods for neutrosophic judicial evaluation Neutrosophic Sets and Systems multicriteria methods judicial evaluation neutrosophy judicial decision-making uncertainty evidence analysis support systems |
| title | Insertion and use of multicriteria methods for neutrosophic judicial evaluation |
| title_full | Insertion and use of multicriteria methods for neutrosophic judicial evaluation |
| title_fullStr | Insertion and use of multicriteria methods for neutrosophic judicial evaluation |
| title_full_unstemmed | Insertion and use of multicriteria methods for neutrosophic judicial evaluation |
| title_short | Insertion and use of multicriteria methods for neutrosophic judicial evaluation |
| title_sort | insertion and use of multicriteria methods for neutrosophic judicial evaluation |
| topic | multicriteria methods judicial evaluation neutrosophy judicial decision-making uncertainty evidence analysis support systems |
| url | https://fs.unm.edu/NSS/33multicriteriamethods.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT robertocarlosjimenezmartinez insertionanduseofmulticriteriamethodsforneutrosophicjudicialevaluation AT mariajosecalderonvelasquez insertionanduseofmulticriteriamethodsforneutrosophicjudicialevaluation AT manuelaugustosuarezalbinol insertionanduseofmulticriteriamethodsforneutrosophicjudicialevaluation AT yusleidymarliegordogomez insertionanduseofmulticriteriamethodsforneutrosophicjudicialevaluation |