Understanding Methodological Visions of Political Science
The manner of reading and interpreting historical texts is one of the central pillars of the methodology and history of thought. The main question in this field is how to study and understand the concepts and meanings of the thinkers in the study of the history of thought? Quentin Skinner is one of...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fas |
| Published: |
Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)
2020-11-01
|
| Series: | پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_5820_d357ef6b1aefa440f13fdeab4ac304b7.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841555279955623936 |
|---|---|
| author | Aliashraf Nazari |
| author_facet | Aliashraf Nazari |
| author_sort | Aliashraf Nazari |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The manner of reading and interpreting historical texts is one of the central pillars of the methodology and history of thought. The main question in this field is how to study and understand the concepts and meanings of the thinkers in the study of the history of thought? Quentin Skinner is one of the founders of the Cambridge School of History and Political Thought, whose work is of philosophical importance, presenting new and influential ideas. Skinner considers the question of how different and conflicting perspectives are to be adapted, which can be still a central issue in contemporary political thought. He has attempted to use the traditional methods of historical research with an intentional approach, to draw attention to their differences, to reconstitute their beliefs, and to be as aware of the processes of the formation of problems and events as possible, to understand the way things are going. He hopes that by examining and evaluating the history of competing theories, he will be able to play a part in these widespread conflicts, regardless of his historical interest. This article will attempt to introduce and review the first volume of the book Visions of Politics: On Methodology. The importance of the critical reading of this series of articles in this book is that it now reflects his intellectual transformation as classical writings. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e9d5f7290f8d418487deb9dca4e9713e |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2383-1650 |
| language | fas |
| publishDate | 2020-11-01 |
| publisher | Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی |
| spelling | doaj-art-e9d5f7290f8d418487deb9dca4e9713e2025-01-08T05:47:06ZfasInstitute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی2383-16502020-11-0120937339310.30465/crtls.2020.30580.18235820Understanding Methodological Visions of Political ScienceAliashraf Nazari0Associate Professor of Political Science, University of TehranThe manner of reading and interpreting historical texts is one of the central pillars of the methodology and history of thought. The main question in this field is how to study and understand the concepts and meanings of the thinkers in the study of the history of thought? Quentin Skinner is one of the founders of the Cambridge School of History and Political Thought, whose work is of philosophical importance, presenting new and influential ideas. Skinner considers the question of how different and conflicting perspectives are to be adapted, which can be still a central issue in contemporary political thought. He has attempted to use the traditional methods of historical research with an intentional approach, to draw attention to their differences, to reconstitute their beliefs, and to be as aware of the processes of the formation of problems and events as possible, to understand the way things are going. He hopes that by examining and evaluating the history of competing theories, he will be able to play a part in these widespread conflicts, regardless of his historical interest. This article will attempt to introduce and review the first volume of the book Visions of Politics: On Methodology. The importance of the critical reading of this series of articles in this book is that it now reflects his intellectual transformation as classical writings.https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_5820_d357ef6b1aefa440f13fdeab4ac304b7.pdfmethodologyhermeneuticspoliticsdoctrine mythintentionalism |
| spellingShingle | Aliashraf Nazari Understanding Methodological Visions of Political Science پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی methodology hermeneutics politics doctrine myth intentionalism |
| title | Understanding Methodological Visions of Political Science |
| title_full | Understanding Methodological Visions of Political Science |
| title_fullStr | Understanding Methodological Visions of Political Science |
| title_full_unstemmed | Understanding Methodological Visions of Political Science |
| title_short | Understanding Methodological Visions of Political Science |
| title_sort | understanding methodological visions of political science |
| topic | methodology hermeneutics politics doctrine myth intentionalism |
| url | https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_5820_d357ef6b1aefa440f13fdeab4ac304b7.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT aliashrafnazari understandingmethodologicalvisionsofpoliticalscience |