Criminal Algorithms and Their Punishment in Modern Constitutionalism

Today's astonishing development of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) has marked the onset of a new era characterised by profound societal and legal changes. Among the numerous groundbreaking developments, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a pivotal force, penetrating vir...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carlo Piparo, Radovan Blažek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Law 2024-12-01
Series:Bratislava Law Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://blr.flaw.uniba.sk/index.php/BLR/article/view/832
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846099561045557248
author Carlo Piparo
Radovan Blažek
author_facet Carlo Piparo
Radovan Blažek
author_sort Carlo Piparo
collection DOAJ
description Today's astonishing development of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) has marked the onset of a new era characterised by profound societal and legal changes. Among the numerous groundbreaking developments, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a pivotal force, penetrating virtually every aspect of our daily existence. From the domains of commerce and industry to healthcare, transportation, and entertainment, AI technologies have become indispensable instruments shaping our interactions, professions, and our way of navigating the world. With its extraordinary capabilities and ever-expanding influence, AI serves as a testament to humanity's unwavering commitment to innovation and the limitless potential of technology to transform our society. While Artificial Intelligence systems can execute actions akin to those that could constitute criminal activities if carried out by humans, the challenge arises from the fact that crimes are typically defined within the framework of established laws. Consequently, it can be quite challenging to classify such AI-induced actions as criminal due to the absence of specific legal provisions. Nevertheless, criminal acts are characterised by the intent - or mens rea - behind it. In this context, the intricate issue of assigning criminal responsibility to AI, being a non-human entity, presents particularly complex theoretical challenges, above all its punishment. This paper aims to define AI and its interactions with criminal law, briefly reconstruct potential liability models for AI, deconstruct the aim of punishment in modern constitutional systems, and evaluate whether modern legal systems allow machines to be punished.
format Article
id doaj-art-e8aae6af96b34a66a5b79d61845bc9cb
institution Kabale University
issn 2585-7088
2644-6359
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Law
record_format Article
series Bratislava Law Review
spelling doaj-art-e8aae6af96b34a66a5b79d61845bc9cb2024-12-31T11:46:42ZengComenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of LawBratislava Law Review2585-70882644-63592024-12-018210.46282/blr.2024.8.2.832Criminal Algorithms and Their Punishment in Modern ConstitutionalismCarlo Piparo0https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7965-0770Radovan Blažek1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3091-3399University of UdineComenius University Bratislava Today's astonishing development of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) has marked the onset of a new era characterised by profound societal and legal changes. Among the numerous groundbreaking developments, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a pivotal force, penetrating virtually every aspect of our daily existence. From the domains of commerce and industry to healthcare, transportation, and entertainment, AI technologies have become indispensable instruments shaping our interactions, professions, and our way of navigating the world. With its extraordinary capabilities and ever-expanding influence, AI serves as a testament to humanity's unwavering commitment to innovation and the limitless potential of technology to transform our society. While Artificial Intelligence systems can execute actions akin to those that could constitute criminal activities if carried out by humans, the challenge arises from the fact that crimes are typically defined within the framework of established laws. Consequently, it can be quite challenging to classify such AI-induced actions as criminal due to the absence of specific legal provisions. Nevertheless, criminal acts are characterised by the intent - or mens rea - behind it. In this context, the intricate issue of assigning criminal responsibility to AI, being a non-human entity, presents particularly complex theoretical challenges, above all its punishment. This paper aims to define AI and its interactions with criminal law, briefly reconstruct potential liability models for AI, deconstruct the aim of punishment in modern constitutional systems, and evaluate whether modern legal systems allow machines to be punished. https://blr.flaw.uniba.sk/index.php/BLR/article/view/832Artificial IntelligenceLiabilityCriminal LawPunishmentEducation
spellingShingle Carlo Piparo
Radovan Blažek
Criminal Algorithms and Their Punishment in Modern Constitutionalism
Bratislava Law Review
Artificial Intelligence
Liability
Criminal Law
Punishment
Education
title Criminal Algorithms and Their Punishment in Modern Constitutionalism
title_full Criminal Algorithms and Their Punishment in Modern Constitutionalism
title_fullStr Criminal Algorithms and Their Punishment in Modern Constitutionalism
title_full_unstemmed Criminal Algorithms and Their Punishment in Modern Constitutionalism
title_short Criminal Algorithms and Their Punishment in Modern Constitutionalism
title_sort criminal algorithms and their punishment in modern constitutionalism
topic Artificial Intelligence
Liability
Criminal Law
Punishment
Education
url https://blr.flaw.uniba.sk/index.php/BLR/article/view/832
work_keys_str_mv AT carlopiparo criminalalgorithmsandtheirpunishmentinmodernconstitutionalism
AT radovanblazek criminalalgorithmsandtheirpunishmentinmodernconstitutionalism