Global Disparities in Simulation-Based Learning Performance: Serial Cross-Sectional Mixed Methods Study
Abstract BackgroundSimulated programs provide health care professionals (HCPs) with a learning opportunity to develop clinical competencies and improve patient outcomes in a safe and controlled environment. While the benefits of simulation training are well established, there...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JMIR Publications
2025-08-01
|
| Series: | JMIR Medical Education |
| Online Access: | https://mededu.jmir.org/2025/1/e52332 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849222457119997952 |
|---|---|
| author | Kashish Malhotra Harshin Balakrishnan Emily Warmington Vina Soran Francesca Crowe Dengyi Zhou SIMBA AND CoMICs Team Punith Kempegowda |
| author_facet | Kashish Malhotra Harshin Balakrishnan Emily Warmington Vina Soran Francesca Crowe Dengyi Zhou SIMBA AND CoMICs Team Punith Kempegowda |
| author_sort | Kashish Malhotra |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Abstract
BackgroundSimulated programs provide health care professionals (HCPs) with a learning opportunity to develop clinical competencies and improve patient outcomes in a safe and controlled environment. While the benefits of simulation training are well established, there is a paucity of research assessing its differential impact, if any. SIMBA (Simulation via Instant Messaging for Bedside Application) provides simulation-based learning through WhatsApp
ObjectivesThis study aims to explore whether there are differences in the clinical performance of HCPs participating in SIMBA sessions based on gender, country of work, and training grade.
MethodsThis study assessed participants in 17 SIMBA sessions from May 2020 to June 2022. WhatsAppP
ResultsA total of 289 participants across 49 countries who completed pre-SIMBA and post-SIMBA surveys in the 17 simulation sessions were included in the analysis. Participants from high-income countries scored higher in all categories of the Global Rating Scale (GRS) except the physical examination and interpretation score. Junior-grade participants scored significantly higher in history taking (junior=4.2, middle=3.7, and senior=3.7; PP
ConclusionsThe significant differences in clinical performance scores between low- and middle-income countries and high-income countries highlight the need for better medical education resources to bridge existing gaps in health care globally. The decrease in some clinical competency scores following career progression could be addressed by simulation-based training to maintain the same quality of history taking and physical examination skills. These outcomes, including no gendered differences in simulation-based learning, hold profound implications for tailoring medical education strategies, fostering equitable training, and elevating patient care standards on a global scale. The need for targeted interventions and capacity-building efforts via context-specific training and tailored approaches to health care education is emphasized. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e7f9e2f89c8d42b48eca95d87ef4d9e6 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2369-3762 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-08-01 |
| publisher | JMIR Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | JMIR Medical Education |
| spelling | doaj-art-e7f9e2f89c8d42b48eca95d87ef4d9e62025-08-26T05:13:14ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Medical Education2369-37622025-08-0111e52332e5233210.2196/52332Global Disparities in Simulation-Based Learning Performance: Serial Cross-Sectional Mixed Methods StudyKashish Malhotrahttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-6985-5731Harshin Balakrishnanhttp://orcid.org/0009-0000-8338-297XEmily Warmingtonhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-4646-1438Vina Soranhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-1534-8929Francesca Crowehttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-4026-1726Dengyi Zhouhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-4515-8488SIMBA AND CoMICs TeamPunith Kempegowdahttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-0954-6512 Abstract BackgroundSimulated programs provide health care professionals (HCPs) with a learning opportunity to develop clinical competencies and improve patient outcomes in a safe and controlled environment. While the benefits of simulation training are well established, there is a paucity of research assessing its differential impact, if any. SIMBA (Simulation via Instant Messaging for Bedside Application) provides simulation-based learning through WhatsApp ObjectivesThis study aims to explore whether there are differences in the clinical performance of HCPs participating in SIMBA sessions based on gender, country of work, and training grade. MethodsThis study assessed participants in 17 SIMBA sessions from May 2020 to June 2022. WhatsAppP ResultsA total of 289 participants across 49 countries who completed pre-SIMBA and post-SIMBA surveys in the 17 simulation sessions were included in the analysis. Participants from high-income countries scored higher in all categories of the Global Rating Scale (GRS) except the physical examination and interpretation score. Junior-grade participants scored significantly higher in history taking (junior=4.2, middle=3.7, and senior=3.7; PP ConclusionsThe significant differences in clinical performance scores between low- and middle-income countries and high-income countries highlight the need for better medical education resources to bridge existing gaps in health care globally. The decrease in some clinical competency scores following career progression could be addressed by simulation-based training to maintain the same quality of history taking and physical examination skills. These outcomes, including no gendered differences in simulation-based learning, hold profound implications for tailoring medical education strategies, fostering equitable training, and elevating patient care standards on a global scale. The need for targeted interventions and capacity-building efforts via context-specific training and tailored approaches to health care education is emphasized.https://mededu.jmir.org/2025/1/e52332 |
| spellingShingle | Kashish Malhotra Harshin Balakrishnan Emily Warmington Vina Soran Francesca Crowe Dengyi Zhou SIMBA AND CoMICs Team Punith Kempegowda Global Disparities in Simulation-Based Learning Performance: Serial Cross-Sectional Mixed Methods Study JMIR Medical Education |
| title | Global Disparities in Simulation-Based Learning Performance: Serial Cross-Sectional Mixed Methods Study |
| title_full | Global Disparities in Simulation-Based Learning Performance: Serial Cross-Sectional Mixed Methods Study |
| title_fullStr | Global Disparities in Simulation-Based Learning Performance: Serial Cross-Sectional Mixed Methods Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Global Disparities in Simulation-Based Learning Performance: Serial Cross-Sectional Mixed Methods Study |
| title_short | Global Disparities in Simulation-Based Learning Performance: Serial Cross-Sectional Mixed Methods Study |
| title_sort | global disparities in simulation based learning performance serial cross sectional mixed methods study |
| url | https://mededu.jmir.org/2025/1/e52332 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kashishmalhotra globaldisparitiesinsimulationbasedlearningperformanceserialcrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy AT harshinbalakrishnan globaldisparitiesinsimulationbasedlearningperformanceserialcrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy AT emilywarmington globaldisparitiesinsimulationbasedlearningperformanceserialcrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy AT vinasoran globaldisparitiesinsimulationbasedlearningperformanceserialcrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy AT francescacrowe globaldisparitiesinsimulationbasedlearningperformanceserialcrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy AT dengyizhou globaldisparitiesinsimulationbasedlearningperformanceserialcrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy AT simbaandcomicsteam globaldisparitiesinsimulationbasedlearningperformanceserialcrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy AT punithkempegowda globaldisparitiesinsimulationbasedlearningperformanceserialcrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy |