RESTRICTING THE RIGHT OF SECOND APPEAL ON UNFAIR TERMS LAWSUITS. AN EUROPEAN MEASURE?
In Romanian civil procedural law, since the regulation of unfair terms, there have been several changes regarding the remedy of second appeal in respect of claims based on the provisions of Law no. 193/2000 on unfair terms in contracts concluded between professionals and consumers. Without disting...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nicolae Titulescu University Publishing House
2024-05-01
|
| Series: | Challenges of the Knowledge Society |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://cks.univnt.ro/download/cks_2024_articles%252F2_CKS_2024_PRIVATE_LAW%252FCKS_2024_PRIVATE_LAW_007.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841562959055159296 |
|---|---|
| author | Mirel-Emanuel NEACȘU |
| author_facet | Mirel-Emanuel NEACȘU |
| author_sort | Mirel-Emanuel NEACȘU |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In Romanian civil procedural law, since the regulation of unfair terms, there have been several changes regarding the remedy of second appeal in respect of claims based on the provisions of Law no. 193/2000 on unfair terms in contracts concluded between professionals and consumers. Without distinguishing between claims brought by natural persons or other bodies recognised by law as having standing in such disputes, the extraordinary remedy of second appeal is currently restricted to unfair terms. In the course of this paper we aim to identify whether this measure is in line with European law on unfair terms and whether the measure is appropriate at national level in relation to the aims pursued by the European and national legislator when enacting legislation protecting the consumer. Also, we will analyse from a teleological point of view the regulatory changes and we will also study the way in which other European countries legislate in this area. Thus, at national level, it is necessary to identify what the legislator had in mind when taking this measure, both with regard to consumers who are natural persons and with regard to the bodies to which the law grants legal standing in such cases. Internationally, we believe that the identification of the policies adopted on the matter will be serious grounds for validating or invalidating domestic policy. Moreover, in this way we will identify whether other European citizens have more, less or equal opportunities to remove unfair terms from the practices of sellers or suppliers. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e5e60bc0e3514d1096259ecae23d3d7e |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2068-7796 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-05-01 |
| publisher | Nicolae Titulescu University Publishing House |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Challenges of the Knowledge Society |
| spelling | doaj-art-e5e60bc0e3514d1096259ecae23d3d7e2025-01-03T00:34:27ZengNicolae Titulescu University Publishing HouseChallenges of the Knowledge Society2068-77962024-05-01171197205RESTRICTING THE RIGHT OF SECOND APPEAL ON UNFAIR TERMS LAWSUITS. AN EUROPEAN MEASURE?Mirel-Emanuel NEACȘU0PhD Candidate, Faculty of Law, „Nicolae Titulescu” University from BucharestIn Romanian civil procedural law, since the regulation of unfair terms, there have been several changes regarding the remedy of second appeal in respect of claims based on the provisions of Law no. 193/2000 on unfair terms in contracts concluded between professionals and consumers. Without distinguishing between claims brought by natural persons or other bodies recognised by law as having standing in such disputes, the extraordinary remedy of second appeal is currently restricted to unfair terms. In the course of this paper we aim to identify whether this measure is in line with European law on unfair terms and whether the measure is appropriate at national level in relation to the aims pursued by the European and national legislator when enacting legislation protecting the consumer. Also, we will analyse from a teleological point of view the regulatory changes and we will also study the way in which other European countries legislate in this area. Thus, at national level, it is necessary to identify what the legislator had in mind when taking this measure, both with regard to consumers who are natural persons and with regard to the bodies to which the law grants legal standing in such cases. Internationally, we believe that the identification of the policies adopted on the matter will be serious grounds for validating or invalidating domestic policy. Moreover, in this way we will identify whether other European citizens have more, less or equal opportunities to remove unfair terms from the practices of sellers or suppliers.http://cks.univnt.ro/download/cks_2024_articles%252F2_CKS_2024_PRIVATE_LAW%252FCKS_2024_PRIVATE_LAW_007.pdfsecond appealprocedural remedyunfair termsopportunitycompliance |
| spellingShingle | Mirel-Emanuel NEACȘU RESTRICTING THE RIGHT OF SECOND APPEAL ON UNFAIR TERMS LAWSUITS. AN EUROPEAN MEASURE? Challenges of the Knowledge Society second appeal procedural remedy unfair terms opportunity compliance |
| title | RESTRICTING THE RIGHT OF SECOND APPEAL ON UNFAIR TERMS LAWSUITS. AN EUROPEAN MEASURE? |
| title_full | RESTRICTING THE RIGHT OF SECOND APPEAL ON UNFAIR TERMS LAWSUITS. AN EUROPEAN MEASURE? |
| title_fullStr | RESTRICTING THE RIGHT OF SECOND APPEAL ON UNFAIR TERMS LAWSUITS. AN EUROPEAN MEASURE? |
| title_full_unstemmed | RESTRICTING THE RIGHT OF SECOND APPEAL ON UNFAIR TERMS LAWSUITS. AN EUROPEAN MEASURE? |
| title_short | RESTRICTING THE RIGHT OF SECOND APPEAL ON UNFAIR TERMS LAWSUITS. AN EUROPEAN MEASURE? |
| title_sort | restricting the right of second appeal on unfair terms lawsuits an european measure |
| topic | second appeal procedural remedy unfair terms opportunity compliance |
| url | http://cks.univnt.ro/download/cks_2024_articles%252F2_CKS_2024_PRIVATE_LAW%252FCKS_2024_PRIVATE_LAW_007.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mirelemanuelneacsu restrictingtherightofsecondappealonunfairtermslawsuitsaneuropeanmeasure |