Can home care work be organized to promote musculoskeletal health for workers? Results from the GoldiCare cluster randomized controlled trial
Abstract Background Workers in home care have high sick leave rates, predominantly because of musculoskeletal pain. The Goldilocks Work Principle proposes that health should be promoted by a “just right” composition of work tasks. Weekly workloads differ substantially between home care workers, sugg...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | BMC Health Services Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-12133-2 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841544910657814528 |
|---|---|
| author | Fredrik Klæboe Lohne Marius Steiro Fimland Javier Palarea-Albaladejo Svend Erik Mathiassen Andreas Holtermann Skender Redzovic |
| author_facet | Fredrik Klæboe Lohne Marius Steiro Fimland Javier Palarea-Albaladejo Svend Erik Mathiassen Andreas Holtermann Skender Redzovic |
| author_sort | Fredrik Klæboe Lohne |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background Workers in home care have high sick leave rates, predominantly because of musculoskeletal pain. The Goldilocks Work Principle proposes that health should be promoted by a “just right” composition of work tasks. Weekly workloads differ substantially between home care workers, suggesting that certain workers may have workloads that are too high, impacting their musculoskeletal health. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a “GoldiCare” intervention redistributing weekly workloads to become more equal among the homecare workers. Outcomes were pain in the neck/shoulder and lower back, and the implementation of the intervention was also evaluated. Methods A 16-week cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted with 125 workers from 11 home care units, divided into six intervention units and five control units. The operation coordinators of each intervention unit were educated in the Goldilocks Work Principle and provided with a planning tool to facilitate an even distribution of high care need clients. The control group continued their usual work. Primary outcomes were pain intensity in the neck/shoulder and lower back (0 to 10). Secondary outcomes included fatigue (0 to 10), composition of physical behaviors and postures (accelerometers), adherence to the intervention (weekly usage rates of the planning tool), and performance of the intervention (percentage of workers with an even distribution of workload). Results The analysis showed no difference between the intervention and control groups in change in lower back pain (0.07, 95%CI[-0.29;0.43]), neck/shoulder pain (-0.06, 95%CI[-0.49;0.36]) or fatigue (0.04, 95%CI[-0.52;0.61]. No significant changes were observed in the composition of physical behaviors (p = 0.067) or postures (p = 0.080–0.131) between the two groups. The intervention was succesfully implemented in three units of the six, with adherence ranging from 82–100% across the intervention period. The remaining three units had an adherence of 0–47%. No improvement in performance was observed. Conclusion No significant intervention effects were observed on musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, or the composition of physical behaviors and postures. The findings suggest that the intervention was not adequately implemented within the organization. Consequently, we cannot discern whether the lack of positive results were due to poor implementation or an ineffective intervention. Results thus highlight the need for a more comprehensive understanding of organizational structures within home care to facilitate more effective implementations. The hypothetical effectiveness of a fully implemented intervention remains unknown. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT05487027, submitted: 03/08/2022. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e5bd062daa5d4539b884a0b5b503e7bd |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1472-6963 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Health Services Research |
| spelling | doaj-art-e5bd062daa5d4539b884a0b5b503e7bd2025-01-12T12:13:17ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632025-01-0125111510.1186/s12913-024-12133-2Can home care work be organized to promote musculoskeletal health for workers? Results from the GoldiCare cluster randomized controlled trialFredrik Klæboe Lohne0Marius Steiro Fimland1Javier Palarea-Albaladejo2Svend Erik Mathiassen3Andreas Holtermann4Skender Redzovic5Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Computer Sciences, Applied Mathematics and Statistics, University of GironaDepartment of Occupational Health, Psychology and Sports Sciences, University of GävleNational Research Centre for the Working EnvironmentDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyAbstract Background Workers in home care have high sick leave rates, predominantly because of musculoskeletal pain. The Goldilocks Work Principle proposes that health should be promoted by a “just right” composition of work tasks. Weekly workloads differ substantially between home care workers, suggesting that certain workers may have workloads that are too high, impacting their musculoskeletal health. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a “GoldiCare” intervention redistributing weekly workloads to become more equal among the homecare workers. Outcomes were pain in the neck/shoulder and lower back, and the implementation of the intervention was also evaluated. Methods A 16-week cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted with 125 workers from 11 home care units, divided into six intervention units and five control units. The operation coordinators of each intervention unit were educated in the Goldilocks Work Principle and provided with a planning tool to facilitate an even distribution of high care need clients. The control group continued their usual work. Primary outcomes were pain intensity in the neck/shoulder and lower back (0 to 10). Secondary outcomes included fatigue (0 to 10), composition of physical behaviors and postures (accelerometers), adherence to the intervention (weekly usage rates of the planning tool), and performance of the intervention (percentage of workers with an even distribution of workload). Results The analysis showed no difference between the intervention and control groups in change in lower back pain (0.07, 95%CI[-0.29;0.43]), neck/shoulder pain (-0.06, 95%CI[-0.49;0.36]) or fatigue (0.04, 95%CI[-0.52;0.61]. No significant changes were observed in the composition of physical behaviors (p = 0.067) or postures (p = 0.080–0.131) between the two groups. The intervention was succesfully implemented in three units of the six, with adherence ranging from 82–100% across the intervention period. The remaining three units had an adherence of 0–47%. No improvement in performance was observed. Conclusion No significant intervention effects were observed on musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, or the composition of physical behaviors and postures. The findings suggest that the intervention was not adequately implemented within the organization. Consequently, we cannot discern whether the lack of positive results were due to poor implementation or an ineffective intervention. Results thus highlight the need for a more comprehensive understanding of organizational structures within home care to facilitate more effective implementations. The hypothetical effectiveness of a fully implemented intervention remains unknown. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT05487027, submitted: 03/08/2022.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-12133-2Goldilocks workCluster randomized controlled trialClinical trialHome careWorker healthCompositional analysis |
| spellingShingle | Fredrik Klæboe Lohne Marius Steiro Fimland Javier Palarea-Albaladejo Svend Erik Mathiassen Andreas Holtermann Skender Redzovic Can home care work be organized to promote musculoskeletal health for workers? Results from the GoldiCare cluster randomized controlled trial BMC Health Services Research Goldilocks work Cluster randomized controlled trial Clinical trial Home care Worker health Compositional analysis |
| title | Can home care work be organized to promote musculoskeletal health for workers? Results from the GoldiCare cluster randomized controlled trial |
| title_full | Can home care work be organized to promote musculoskeletal health for workers? Results from the GoldiCare cluster randomized controlled trial |
| title_fullStr | Can home care work be organized to promote musculoskeletal health for workers? Results from the GoldiCare cluster randomized controlled trial |
| title_full_unstemmed | Can home care work be organized to promote musculoskeletal health for workers? Results from the GoldiCare cluster randomized controlled trial |
| title_short | Can home care work be organized to promote musculoskeletal health for workers? Results from the GoldiCare cluster randomized controlled trial |
| title_sort | can home care work be organized to promote musculoskeletal health for workers results from the goldicare cluster randomized controlled trial |
| topic | Goldilocks work Cluster randomized controlled trial Clinical trial Home care Worker health Compositional analysis |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-12133-2 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT fredrikklæboelohne canhomecareworkbeorganizedtopromotemusculoskeletalhealthforworkersresultsfromthegoldicareclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mariussteirofimland canhomecareworkbeorganizedtopromotemusculoskeletalhealthforworkersresultsfromthegoldicareclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT javierpalareaalbaladejo canhomecareworkbeorganizedtopromotemusculoskeletalhealthforworkersresultsfromthegoldicareclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT svenderikmathiassen canhomecareworkbeorganizedtopromotemusculoskeletalhealthforworkersresultsfromthegoldicareclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT andreasholtermann canhomecareworkbeorganizedtopromotemusculoskeletalhealthforworkersresultsfromthegoldicareclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT skenderredzovic canhomecareworkbeorganizedtopromotemusculoskeletalhealthforworkersresultsfromthegoldicareclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial |