Comparative analysis of Access PCT and Elecsys BRAHMS PCT assays for procalcitonin measurements

Background Procalcitonin (PCT) is a crucial biomarker for diagnosing sepsis and managing antibiotic therapy. This study evaluated the analytical performance and comparability of the Access PCT and Elecsys BRAHMS PCT assays. Methods The precision, detection capability, linearity, and reference range...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hyunji Choi, Sang-Shin Lee, Hyunyong Hwang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Kosin University College of Medicine 2024-12-01
Series:Kosin Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.kosinmedj.org/upload/pdf/kmj-24-155.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846100565231140864
author Hyunji Choi
Sang-Shin Lee
Hyunyong Hwang
author_facet Hyunji Choi
Sang-Shin Lee
Hyunyong Hwang
author_sort Hyunji Choi
collection DOAJ
description Background Procalcitonin (PCT) is a crucial biomarker for diagnosing sepsis and managing antibiotic therapy. This study evaluated the analytical performance and comparability of the Access PCT and Elecsys BRAHMS PCT assays. Methods The precision, detection capability, linearity, and reference range of both assays were assessed. A comparative analysis included 182 patient samples categorized into four risk groups to compare the results between Access PCT and Elecsys BRAHMS PCT assays. Results The Access PCT assay demonstrated precision within the manufacturer’s threshold, and its detection capabilities were verified. This assay exhibited excellent linearity and appropriate reference intervals. Comparative analysis indicated that the Access PCT assay reported higher overall PCT levels than the Elecsys BRAHMS assay, with high agreement between the assays (κ=0.941). However, the biases varied across different PCT concentration intervals. Conclusions Both the Access PCT and Elecsys BRAHMS PCT assays performed robustly with notable concordance but varying biases at different concentration intervals. The observed biases require careful consideration in clinical decision-making, especially when adopting novel assay systems. Standardizing the calibration across different platforms is recommended to improve assay comparability.
format Article
id doaj-art-e49eeab7afdc4708801b4a79f08d76ef
institution Kabale University
issn 2005-9531
2586-7024
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Kosin University College of Medicine
record_format Article
series Kosin Medical Journal
spelling doaj-art-e49eeab7afdc4708801b4a79f08d76ef2024-12-30T04:43:15ZengKosin University College of MedicineKosin Medical Journal2005-95312586-70242024-12-0139427228010.7180/kmj.24.1551308Comparative analysis of Access PCT and Elecsys BRAHMS PCT assays for procalcitonin measurementsHyunji Choi0Sang-Shin Lee1Hyunyong Hwang2 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea Department of Psychiatry, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea Department of Laboratory Medicine, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, KoreaBackground Procalcitonin (PCT) is a crucial biomarker for diagnosing sepsis and managing antibiotic therapy. This study evaluated the analytical performance and comparability of the Access PCT and Elecsys BRAHMS PCT assays. Methods The precision, detection capability, linearity, and reference range of both assays were assessed. A comparative analysis included 182 patient samples categorized into four risk groups to compare the results between Access PCT and Elecsys BRAHMS PCT assays. Results The Access PCT assay demonstrated precision within the manufacturer’s threshold, and its detection capabilities were verified. This assay exhibited excellent linearity and appropriate reference intervals. Comparative analysis indicated that the Access PCT assay reported higher overall PCT levels than the Elecsys BRAHMS assay, with high agreement between the assays (κ=0.941). However, the biases varied across different PCT concentration intervals. Conclusions Both the Access PCT and Elecsys BRAHMS PCT assays performed robustly with notable concordance but varying biases at different concentration intervals. The observed biases require careful consideration in clinical decision-making, especially when adopting novel assay systems. Standardizing the calibration across different platforms is recommended to improve assay comparability.http://www.kosinmedj.org/upload/pdf/kmj-24-155.pdfagreementlimit of detectionlinearityprecisionprocalcitonin
spellingShingle Hyunji Choi
Sang-Shin Lee
Hyunyong Hwang
Comparative analysis of Access PCT and Elecsys BRAHMS PCT assays for procalcitonin measurements
Kosin Medical Journal
agreement
limit of detection
linearity
precision
procalcitonin
title Comparative analysis of Access PCT and Elecsys BRAHMS PCT assays for procalcitonin measurements
title_full Comparative analysis of Access PCT and Elecsys BRAHMS PCT assays for procalcitonin measurements
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of Access PCT and Elecsys BRAHMS PCT assays for procalcitonin measurements
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of Access PCT and Elecsys BRAHMS PCT assays for procalcitonin measurements
title_short Comparative analysis of Access PCT and Elecsys BRAHMS PCT assays for procalcitonin measurements
title_sort comparative analysis of access pct and elecsys brahms pct assays for procalcitonin measurements
topic agreement
limit of detection
linearity
precision
procalcitonin
url http://www.kosinmedj.org/upload/pdf/kmj-24-155.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hyunjichoi comparativeanalysisofaccesspctandelecsysbrahmspctassaysforprocalcitoninmeasurements
AT sangshinlee comparativeanalysisofaccesspctandelecsysbrahmspctassaysforprocalcitoninmeasurements
AT hyunyonghwang comparativeanalysisofaccesspctandelecsysbrahmspctassaysforprocalcitoninmeasurements