Ruritanian Romps: Kitsch Sentiment and Style
The article claims a cycle of British Ruritanian romps as exemplarily kitsch in both scenario and mise-en scène, identifying a number of recurrent thematic and aesthetic motifs. Furthermore, drawing on commentary provided by Gillo Dorfles, Hermann Broch and Ludwig Giesz, the article argues that Ruri...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Presses universitaires de Rennes
2017-09-01
|
| Series: | Revue LISA |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/lisa/9050 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841558395367194624 |
|---|---|
| author | Amy Sargeant |
| author_facet | Amy Sargeant |
| author_sort | Amy Sargeant |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The article claims a cycle of British Ruritanian romps as exemplarily kitsch in both scenario and mise-en scène, identifying a number of recurrent thematic and aesthetic motifs. Furthermore, drawing on commentary provided by Gillo Dorfles, Hermann Broch and Ludwig Giesz, the article argues that Ruritanian films qualify as kitsch by way of their imitation of literary sources. Ruritania may be regarded as a decoy for British geo-political anxieties, substituting for any number of Balkan aliases, and as an escapist deflection of domestic concerns. The article discusses Anthony Hope as founding father of Ruritania and Noël Coward’s 1926 The Queen Was in the Parlour (filmed in 1927) as a self-consciously derivative case study. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e44f610106b945de97c328797a286e9b |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1762-6153 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2017-09-01 |
| publisher | Presses universitaires de Rennes |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Revue LISA |
| spelling | doaj-art-e44f610106b945de97c328797a286e9b2025-01-06T09:03:23ZengPresses universitaires de RennesRevue LISA1762-61532017-09-011510.4000/lisa.9050Ruritanian Romps: Kitsch Sentiment and StyleAmy SargeantThe article claims a cycle of British Ruritanian romps as exemplarily kitsch in both scenario and mise-en scène, identifying a number of recurrent thematic and aesthetic motifs. Furthermore, drawing on commentary provided by Gillo Dorfles, Hermann Broch and Ludwig Giesz, the article argues that Ruritanian films qualify as kitsch by way of their imitation of literary sources. Ruritania may be regarded as a decoy for British geo-political anxieties, substituting for any number of Balkan aliases, and as an escapist deflection of domestic concerns. The article discusses Anthony Hope as founding father of Ruritania and Noël Coward’s 1926 The Queen Was in the Parlour (filmed in 1927) as a self-consciously derivative case study.https://journals.openedition.org/lisa/9050kitschnostalgiaHope AnthonyCoward Noëlruritanian romps |
| spellingShingle | Amy Sargeant Ruritanian Romps: Kitsch Sentiment and Style Revue LISA kitsch nostalgia Hope Anthony Coward Noël ruritanian romps |
| title | Ruritanian Romps: Kitsch Sentiment and Style |
| title_full | Ruritanian Romps: Kitsch Sentiment and Style |
| title_fullStr | Ruritanian Romps: Kitsch Sentiment and Style |
| title_full_unstemmed | Ruritanian Romps: Kitsch Sentiment and Style |
| title_short | Ruritanian Romps: Kitsch Sentiment and Style |
| title_sort | ruritanian romps kitsch sentiment and style |
| topic | kitsch nostalgia Hope Anthony Coward Noël ruritanian romps |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/lisa/9050 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT amysargeant ruritanianrompskitschsentimentandstyle |