Sorrow for books: What did the compilers of 16th-century autobibliographies worry about?

The article examines a type of “autobiographical sadness” — the author’s feelings associated with the creation and publication of books. Varied manifestations of self-reflection and emotions are found in texts of the autobibliographic genre, which flourished in the era of humanism and early printing...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: M. L. Sergeev
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. RANEPA 2023-12-01
Series:Шаги
Subjects:
Online Access:https://steps.ranepa.ru/jour/article/view/191
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849317392438525952
author M. L. Sergeev
author_facet M. L. Sergeev
author_sort M. L. Sergeev
collection DOAJ
description The article examines a type of “autobiographical sadness” — the author’s feelings associated with the creation and publication of books. Varied manifestations of self-reflection and emotions are found in texts of the autobibliographic genre, which flourished in the era of humanism and early printing. The synthesisof bibliography and biography, which had Greek and Roman prototypes and was characteristic, among others, of humanist handbooks in bibliography, contributed to the explicit expression of the authorial “self” in such seemingly technical, dry and “objective” works. The very structure of these handbooks implied the inclusion of an article about its compiler in the text. In this article, two examples of such texts are analyzed — namely, the autobibliographies by the Swiss polymath Conrad Gessner and by the English clergyman and historian John Bale. Written only three years apart (in 1545 and 1548, respectively), they nevertheless differ significantly, in both the organization of the biographical narrative and in the nature of book presentation. The article shows that the peculiarity of these texts is largely due to differences in the self-identification and self-presentation of their authors. While for Bale the acquisition of the true faith and confessional polemics were of fundamental importance, Gessner, though also a Protestant, places his own formation as a humanist author and interaction with book publishers in the focus of the story.
format Article
id doaj-art-e344d8c8d15e4091a88b8e20a286ad4c
institution Kabale University
issn 2412-9410
2782-1765
language English
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. RANEPA
record_format Article
series Шаги
spelling doaj-art-e344d8c8d15e4091a88b8e20a286ad4c2025-08-20T03:51:13ZengRussian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. RANEPAШаги2412-94102782-17652023-12-019411713410.22394/2412-9410-2023-9-4-117-134190Sorrow for books: What did the compilers of 16th-century autobibliographies worry about?M. L. Sergeev0Санкт-Петербургский филиал Института истории естествознания и техники им. С. И. Вавилова РАН; Российская национальная библиотекаThe article examines a type of “autobiographical sadness” — the author’s feelings associated with the creation and publication of books. Varied manifestations of self-reflection and emotions are found in texts of the autobibliographic genre, which flourished in the era of humanism and early printing. The synthesisof bibliography and biography, which had Greek and Roman prototypes and was characteristic, among others, of humanist handbooks in bibliography, contributed to the explicit expression of the authorial “self” in such seemingly technical, dry and “objective” works. The very structure of these handbooks implied the inclusion of an article about its compiler in the text. In this article, two examples of such texts are analyzed — namely, the autobibliographies by the Swiss polymath Conrad Gessner and by the English clergyman and historian John Bale. Written only three years apart (in 1545 and 1548, respectively), they nevertheless differ significantly, in both the organization of the biographical narrative and in the nature of book presentation. The article shows that the peculiarity of these texts is largely due to differences in the self-identification and self-presentation of their authors. While for Bale the acquisition of the true faith and confessional polemics were of fundamental importance, Gessner, though also a Protestant, places his own formation as a humanist author and interaction with book publishers in the focus of the story.https://steps.ranepa.ru/jour/article/view/191renaissancehumanismbook historybook printingreformationswitzerlandgreat britainearly modern europeautobiographyautobibliographyreference booksself-presentation
spellingShingle M. L. Sergeev
Sorrow for books: What did the compilers of 16th-century autobibliographies worry about?
Шаги
renaissance
humanism
book history
book printing
reformation
switzerland
great britain
early modern europe
autobiography
autobibliography
reference books
self-presentation
title Sorrow for books: What did the compilers of 16th-century autobibliographies worry about?
title_full Sorrow for books: What did the compilers of 16th-century autobibliographies worry about?
title_fullStr Sorrow for books: What did the compilers of 16th-century autobibliographies worry about?
title_full_unstemmed Sorrow for books: What did the compilers of 16th-century autobibliographies worry about?
title_short Sorrow for books: What did the compilers of 16th-century autobibliographies worry about?
title_sort sorrow for books what did the compilers of 16th century autobibliographies worry about
topic renaissance
humanism
book history
book printing
reformation
switzerland
great britain
early modern europe
autobiography
autobibliography
reference books
self-presentation
url https://steps.ranepa.ru/jour/article/view/191
work_keys_str_mv AT mlsergeev sorrowforbookswhatdidthecompilersof16thcenturyautobibliographiesworryabout