Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias.
<h4>Background</h4>The increased use of meta-analysis in systematic reviews of healthcare interventions has highlighted several types of bias that can arise during the completion of a randomised controlled trial. Study publication bias has been recognised as a potential threat to the val...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Kerry Dwan, Douglas G Altman, Juan A Arnaiz, Jill Bloom, An-Wen Chan, Eugenia Cronin, Evelyne Decullier, Philippa J Easterbrook, Erik Von Elm, Carrol Gamble, Davina Ghersi, John P A Ioannidis, John Simes, Paula R Williamson |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2008-08-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003081 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated review.
by: Kerry Dwan, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
Biased and Biasing: The Hidden Bias Cascade and Bias Snowball Effects
by: Itiel E. Dror
Published: (2025-04-01) -
COVID-19 advocacy bias in the BMJ: meta-research evaluation
by: John P A Ioannidis, et al.
Published: (2025-03-01) -
Visibility bias for sage‐grouse lek counts
by: Jeremy A. Baumgardt, et al.
Published: (2017-09-01) -
Evidence for the selective reporting of analyses and discrepancies in clinical trials: a systematic review of cohort studies of clinical trials.
by: Kerry Dwan, et al.
Published: (2014-06-01)