Antianginal effectiveness and tolerability of ivabradine in patients with stable angina: CONTROL-2 Study results

Aim. To compare the effectiveness of the combination therapy with ivabradine and β-adrenoblockers (β-AB) and the dose-titration β-AB therapy. Material and methods. This multi-centre, open, controlled study included 1104 patients with functional Class (FC) II-III stable angina (SA), sinus rhythm, and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu. A. Karpov, M. G. Glezer, Yu. A. Vasyuk, R. T. Saygitov, E. L. Shkolnik
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: «SILICEA-POLIGRAF» LLC 1970-01-01
Series:Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cardiovascular.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/2069
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849250418462294016
author Yu. A. Karpov
M. G. Glezer
Yu. A. Vasyuk
R. T. Saygitov
E. L. Shkolnik
author_facet Yu. A. Karpov
M. G. Glezer
Yu. A. Vasyuk
R. T. Saygitov
E. L. Shkolnik
author_sort Yu. A. Karpov
collection DOAJ
description Aim. To compare the effectiveness of the combination therapy with ivabradine and β-adrenoblockers (β-AB) and the dose-titration β-AB therapy. Material and methods. This multi-centre, open, controlled study included 1104 patients with functional Class (FC) II-III stable angina (SA), sinus rhythm, and heart rate (HR) ≥60 bpm, who received regular β-AB therapy in submaximal doses. The participants were divided into the standard therapy group (β-AB therapy with the dose titration to the maximal tolerated dose; 228 patients (20,7%)) and the ivabradine therapy group (876 patients (79,3%))Results. Both groups were comparable by main demographical and clinical characteristics. Adding ivabradine to the β-AB therapy resulted in a more pronounced HR reduction at Week 16, compared to the standard therapy group (61±6 vs. 63±8 bpm; p=0,001). By the end of the study, the percentage of the patients with FC I SA was significantly higher in the ivabradine group than in the standard therapy group (37,1% vs. 28%; p=0,017). The average number of angina attacks between Weeks 8 and 16 was significantly lower in the ivabradine group than in the standard therapy group – 4 (2;10) vs. 6 (2;15), respectively (p=0,015). In the standard therapy group, the incidence of adverse events, such as dyspnoea, hypotension, and fatigue, was significantly higher than in the ivabradine group – 18,4% vs. 9,4%, respectively (p<0,001). Conclusion. In SA patients, the combination therapy with β-AB and ivabradine demonstrated good tolerability, safety, and high antianginal effectiveness, which resulted in a more pronounced clinical improvement, compared to the dose-titration β-AB therapy.
format Article
id doaj-art-e2abe53887a246858b49c3c7768ec75d
institution Kabale University
issn 1728-8800
2619-0125
language Russian
publishDate 1970-01-01
publisher «SILICEA-POLIGRAF» LLC
record_format Article
series Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика
spelling doaj-art-e2abe53887a246858b49c3c7768ec75d2025-08-20T03:57:17Zrus«SILICEA-POLIGRAF» LLCКардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика1728-88002619-01251970-01-0110883891781Antianginal effectiveness and tolerability of ivabradine in patients with stable angina: CONTROL-2 Study resultsYu. A. Karpov0M. G. Glezer1Yu. A. Vasyuk2R. T. Saygitov3E. L. Shkolnik4Russian Cardiology Scientific and Clinical ComplexI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityMoscow State Medico-Stomatological UniversityI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityMoscow State Medico-Stomatological UniversityAim. To compare the effectiveness of the combination therapy with ivabradine and β-adrenoblockers (β-AB) and the dose-titration β-AB therapy. Material and methods. This multi-centre, open, controlled study included 1104 patients with functional Class (FC) II-III stable angina (SA), sinus rhythm, and heart rate (HR) ≥60 bpm, who received regular β-AB therapy in submaximal doses. The participants were divided into the standard therapy group (β-AB therapy with the dose titration to the maximal tolerated dose; 228 patients (20,7%)) and the ivabradine therapy group (876 patients (79,3%))Results. Both groups were comparable by main demographical and clinical characteristics. Adding ivabradine to the β-AB therapy resulted in a more pronounced HR reduction at Week 16, compared to the standard therapy group (61±6 vs. 63±8 bpm; p=0,001). By the end of the study, the percentage of the patients with FC I SA was significantly higher in the ivabradine group than in the standard therapy group (37,1% vs. 28%; p=0,017). The average number of angina attacks between Weeks 8 and 16 was significantly lower in the ivabradine group than in the standard therapy group – 4 (2;10) vs. 6 (2;15), respectively (p=0,015). In the standard therapy group, the incidence of adverse events, such as dyspnoea, hypotension, and fatigue, was significantly higher than in the ivabradine group – 18,4% vs. 9,4%, respectively (p<0,001). Conclusion. In SA patients, the combination therapy with β-AB and ivabradine demonstrated good tolerability, safety, and high antianginal effectiveness, which resulted in a more pronounced clinical improvement, compared to the dose-titration β-AB therapy.https://cardiovascular.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/2069stable anginatreatmentβ-adrenoblockersquality of lifeivabradine
spellingShingle Yu. A. Karpov
M. G. Glezer
Yu. A. Vasyuk
R. T. Saygitov
E. L. Shkolnik
Antianginal effectiveness and tolerability of ivabradine in patients with stable angina: CONTROL-2 Study results
Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика
stable angina
treatment
β-adrenoblockers
quality of life
ivabradine
title Antianginal effectiveness and tolerability of ivabradine in patients with stable angina: CONTROL-2 Study results
title_full Antianginal effectiveness and tolerability of ivabradine in patients with stable angina: CONTROL-2 Study results
title_fullStr Antianginal effectiveness and tolerability of ivabradine in patients with stable angina: CONTROL-2 Study results
title_full_unstemmed Antianginal effectiveness and tolerability of ivabradine in patients with stable angina: CONTROL-2 Study results
title_short Antianginal effectiveness and tolerability of ivabradine in patients with stable angina: CONTROL-2 Study results
title_sort antianginal effectiveness and tolerability of ivabradine in patients with stable angina control 2 study results
topic stable angina
treatment
β-adrenoblockers
quality of life
ivabradine
url https://cardiovascular.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/2069
work_keys_str_mv AT yuakarpov antianginaleffectivenessandtolerabilityofivabradineinpatientswithstableanginacontrol2studyresults
AT mgglezer antianginaleffectivenessandtolerabilityofivabradineinpatientswithstableanginacontrol2studyresults
AT yuavasyuk antianginaleffectivenessandtolerabilityofivabradineinpatientswithstableanginacontrol2studyresults
AT rtsaygitov antianginaleffectivenessandtolerabilityofivabradineinpatientswithstableanginacontrol2studyresults
AT elshkolnik antianginaleffectivenessandtolerabilityofivabradineinpatientswithstableanginacontrol2studyresults