Outcomes of different surgical procedures for optic disc pit: a meta-analysis

Objective To assess the surgical outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in conjunction with various adjuvant procedures for optic disc pit maculopathy (ODPM). Methods We conducted a literature search to identify clinical studies and case series of surgically treated OPM patients. (1) greater than t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hussain A. Khaqan, Raheela Naz, Hafiz A. ur Rehman, Laraib Hassan, Nabeel Akram, Hafiz M. Farooqui, Ahmad Fauzan, Asad M. Khan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2024-05-01
Series:Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ejos.ejos_79_23
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841560374601580544
author Hussain A. Khaqan
Raheela Naz
Hafiz A. ur Rehman
Laraib Hassan
Nabeel Akram
Hafiz M. Farooqui
Ahmad Fauzan
Asad M. Khan
author_facet Hussain A. Khaqan
Raheela Naz
Hafiz A. ur Rehman
Laraib Hassan
Nabeel Akram
Hafiz M. Farooqui
Ahmad Fauzan
Asad M. Khan
author_sort Hussain A. Khaqan
collection DOAJ
description Objective To assess the surgical outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in conjunction with various adjuvant procedures for optic disc pit maculopathy (ODPM). Methods We conducted a literature search to identify clinical studies and case series of surgically treated OPM patients. (1) greater than two patients, (2) surgical treatment and (3) reporting of pre and postoperative visual acuity data were inclusion criteria. We excluded review articles and studies unavailable in the English language. One-way analysis of variance, Pearson’s chi-squared test and straightforward linear regression were used to analyze the results. Results A total of 838 studies were initially identified as potentially relevant studies. After removing duplicates and screening titles and abstracts, the eligibility of 86 full-text articles was evaluated. There were 50 studies included in the meta-analysis. We identified the following commonly reported techniques: juxtapapillary laser alone, PPV alone or with juxtapapillary laser (PPV/JPL), internal limiting membrane peeling (PPV/ILMP), both ILMP and JPL (PPV/ILMP/JPL), inner retinal fenestration (PPV/IRF), autologous platelet concentrate (PPV/APC), macular buckling alone or with PPV, PPV with ocriplasmin (PPV/OCR) and PPV with autologous scleral flap. All groups showed an improvement in best-corrected visual acuity compared with baseline, with no significant differences between groups. The average OPM resolution rate for all groups was 70% (range: 56–100%), and the average resolution duration was 9.1 months. Central macular thickness was diminished in the PPV, PPV/JPL, and PPV/ILMP groups, but there were no significant differences between groups. There was no effect on the outcomes. Analyses of linear regression revealed significant correlations between preoperative best-corrected visual acuity and the aforementioned outcome measures. The rate of complete anatomic success and visual improvement following PPV is ∼85%. Anatomic and visual success rates for PPV alone are 89% and 100%, respectively, according to subgroup analysis. Gas tamponade, laser and ILMP during vitrectomy are less promising, whereas PPV with ILM flap stuffing may yield better results than cases without it. Conclusion We did not find a significant difference in functional outcomes between the various surgical procedures used to treat OPM. Based on the available evidence, PPV is effective for ODPM, while gas tamponade, laser and ILMP should be used with caution. This study is limited by its reliance on retrospective studies and publication bias towards positive outcomes.
format Article
id doaj-art-e236cd0fe4624f16a68177817d81f1d5
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-0686
language English
publishDate 2024-05-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society
spelling doaj-art-e236cd0fe4624f16a68177817d81f1d52025-01-04T10:24:27ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society2090-06862024-05-01117210010710.4103/ejos.ejos_79_23Outcomes of different surgical procedures for optic disc pit: a meta-analysisHussain A. KhaqanRaheela NazHafiz A. ur RehmanLaraib HassanNabeel AkramHafiz M. FarooquiAhmad FauzanAsad M. KhanObjective To assess the surgical outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in conjunction with various adjuvant procedures for optic disc pit maculopathy (ODPM). Methods We conducted a literature search to identify clinical studies and case series of surgically treated OPM patients. (1) greater than two patients, (2) surgical treatment and (3) reporting of pre and postoperative visual acuity data were inclusion criteria. We excluded review articles and studies unavailable in the English language. One-way analysis of variance, Pearson’s chi-squared test and straightforward linear regression were used to analyze the results. Results A total of 838 studies were initially identified as potentially relevant studies. After removing duplicates and screening titles and abstracts, the eligibility of 86 full-text articles was evaluated. There were 50 studies included in the meta-analysis. We identified the following commonly reported techniques: juxtapapillary laser alone, PPV alone or with juxtapapillary laser (PPV/JPL), internal limiting membrane peeling (PPV/ILMP), both ILMP and JPL (PPV/ILMP/JPL), inner retinal fenestration (PPV/IRF), autologous platelet concentrate (PPV/APC), macular buckling alone or with PPV, PPV with ocriplasmin (PPV/OCR) and PPV with autologous scleral flap. All groups showed an improvement in best-corrected visual acuity compared with baseline, with no significant differences between groups. The average OPM resolution rate for all groups was 70% (range: 56–100%), and the average resolution duration was 9.1 months. Central macular thickness was diminished in the PPV, PPV/JPL, and PPV/ILMP groups, but there were no significant differences between groups. There was no effect on the outcomes. Analyses of linear regression revealed significant correlations between preoperative best-corrected visual acuity and the aforementioned outcome measures. The rate of complete anatomic success and visual improvement following PPV is ∼85%. Anatomic and visual success rates for PPV alone are 89% and 100%, respectively, according to subgroup analysis. Gas tamponade, laser and ILMP during vitrectomy are less promising, whereas PPV with ILM flap stuffing may yield better results than cases without it. Conclusion We did not find a significant difference in functional outcomes between the various surgical procedures used to treat OPM. Based on the available evidence, PPV is effective for ODPM, while gas tamponade, laser and ILMP should be used with caution. This study is limited by its reliance on retrospective studies and publication bias towards positive outcomes.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ejos.ejos_79_23maculopathyoptic disc pitpars plana vitrectomy
spellingShingle Hussain A. Khaqan
Raheela Naz
Hafiz A. ur Rehman
Laraib Hassan
Nabeel Akram
Hafiz M. Farooqui
Ahmad Fauzan
Asad M. Khan
Outcomes of different surgical procedures for optic disc pit: a meta-analysis
Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society
maculopathy
optic disc pit
pars plana vitrectomy
title Outcomes of different surgical procedures for optic disc pit: a meta-analysis
title_full Outcomes of different surgical procedures for optic disc pit: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Outcomes of different surgical procedures for optic disc pit: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of different surgical procedures for optic disc pit: a meta-analysis
title_short Outcomes of different surgical procedures for optic disc pit: a meta-analysis
title_sort outcomes of different surgical procedures for optic disc pit a meta analysis
topic maculopathy
optic disc pit
pars plana vitrectomy
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ejos.ejos_79_23
work_keys_str_mv AT hussainakhaqan outcomesofdifferentsurgicalproceduresforopticdiscpitametaanalysis
AT raheelanaz outcomesofdifferentsurgicalproceduresforopticdiscpitametaanalysis
AT hafizaurrehman outcomesofdifferentsurgicalproceduresforopticdiscpitametaanalysis
AT laraibhassan outcomesofdifferentsurgicalproceduresforopticdiscpitametaanalysis
AT nabeelakram outcomesofdifferentsurgicalproceduresforopticdiscpitametaanalysis
AT hafizmfarooqui outcomesofdifferentsurgicalproceduresforopticdiscpitametaanalysis
AT ahmadfauzan outcomesofdifferentsurgicalproceduresforopticdiscpitametaanalysis
AT asadmkhan outcomesofdifferentsurgicalproceduresforopticdiscpitametaanalysis