Impact of the abolition of copayments on the GP-centred coordination of care in Bavaria, Germany: analysis of routinely collected claims data
Objectives In 2012, Germany abolished copayment for consultations in ambulatory care. This study investigated the effect of the abolition on general practitioner (GP)-centred coordination of care. We assessed how the proportion of patients with coordinated specialist care changed over time when copa...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020-09-01
|
| Series: | BMJ Open |
| Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e035575.full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841556126143873024 |
|---|---|
| author | Werner Maier Antonius Schneider Lars Schwettmann Ewan Donnachie Martin Tauscher Roman Gerlach Klaus Linde Michaela Olm |
| author_facet | Werner Maier Antonius Schneider Lars Schwettmann Ewan Donnachie Martin Tauscher Roman Gerlach Klaus Linde Michaela Olm |
| author_sort | Werner Maier |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objectives In 2012, Germany abolished copayment for consultations in ambulatory care. This study investigated the effect of the abolition on general practitioner (GP)-centred coordination of care. We assessed how the proportion of patients with coordinated specialist care changed over time when copayment to all specialist services were removed. Furthermore, we studied how the number of ambulatory emergency cases and apparent ‘doctor shopping’ changed after the abolition.Design A retrospective routine data analysis of the Bavarian Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians, comparing the years 2011 and 2012 (with copayment), with the period from 2013 to 2016 (without copayment). Therefore, time series analyses covering 24 quarters were performed.Setting Primary care in Bavaria, Germany.Participants All statutorily insured patients in Bavaria, aged ≥18 years, with at least one ambulatory specialist contact between 2011 and 2016.Primary and secondary outcome measures Primary outcome was the percentage of patients with GP-coordinated care (every regular specialist consultation within a quarter was preceded by a GP referral). Secondary outcomes were the number of ambulatory emergency cases and apparent ‘doctor shopping’.Results After the abolition, the proportion of coordinated patients decreased from 49.6% (2011) to 15.5% (2016). Overall, younger patients and those living in areas with lower levels of deprivation showed the lowest proportions of coordination, which further decreased after abolition. Additionally, there were concomitant increases in the number of ambulatory emergency contacts and to a lesser extent in the number of patients with apparent ‘doctor shopping’.Conclusions The abolition of copayment in Germany was associated with a substantial decrease in GP coordination of specialist care. This suggests that the copayment was a partly effective tool to support coordinated care. Future studies are required to investigate how the gatekeeping function of GPs in Germany can best be strengthened while minimising the associated administrative overhead. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e16c923330714c408095b872d0720c47 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2044-6055 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2020-09-01 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMJ Open |
| spelling | doaj-art-e16c923330714c408095b872d0720c472025-01-07T13:40:11ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552020-09-0110910.1136/bmjopen-2019-035575Impact of the abolition of copayments on the GP-centred coordination of care in Bavaria, Germany: analysis of routinely collected claims dataWerner Maier0Antonius Schneider1Lars Schwettmann2Ewan Donnachie3Martin Tauscher4Roman Gerlach5Klaus Linde6Michaela Olm7German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Neuherberg, GermanyInstitute of General Practice and Health Services Research, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, GermanyDepartment of Economics, Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg, Halle, Germany2 Bavarian Association of Statutory Insurance Physicians, Munich, Germany2 Bavarian Association of Statutory Insurance Physicians, Munich, GermanyBavarian Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians, Munich, Germany1 Institute of General Practice and Health Services Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, GermanyInstitute of General Practice and Health Services Research, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Munich, GermanyObjectives In 2012, Germany abolished copayment for consultations in ambulatory care. This study investigated the effect of the abolition on general practitioner (GP)-centred coordination of care. We assessed how the proportion of patients with coordinated specialist care changed over time when copayment to all specialist services were removed. Furthermore, we studied how the number of ambulatory emergency cases and apparent ‘doctor shopping’ changed after the abolition.Design A retrospective routine data analysis of the Bavarian Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians, comparing the years 2011 and 2012 (with copayment), with the period from 2013 to 2016 (without copayment). Therefore, time series analyses covering 24 quarters were performed.Setting Primary care in Bavaria, Germany.Participants All statutorily insured patients in Bavaria, aged ≥18 years, with at least one ambulatory specialist contact between 2011 and 2016.Primary and secondary outcome measures Primary outcome was the percentage of patients with GP-coordinated care (every regular specialist consultation within a quarter was preceded by a GP referral). Secondary outcomes were the number of ambulatory emergency cases and apparent ‘doctor shopping’.Results After the abolition, the proportion of coordinated patients decreased from 49.6% (2011) to 15.5% (2016). Overall, younger patients and those living in areas with lower levels of deprivation showed the lowest proportions of coordination, which further decreased after abolition. Additionally, there were concomitant increases in the number of ambulatory emergency contacts and to a lesser extent in the number of patients with apparent ‘doctor shopping’.Conclusions The abolition of copayment in Germany was associated with a substantial decrease in GP coordination of specialist care. This suggests that the copayment was a partly effective tool to support coordinated care. Future studies are required to investigate how the gatekeeping function of GPs in Germany can best be strengthened while minimising the associated administrative overhead.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e035575.full |
| spellingShingle | Werner Maier Antonius Schneider Lars Schwettmann Ewan Donnachie Martin Tauscher Roman Gerlach Klaus Linde Michaela Olm Impact of the abolition of copayments on the GP-centred coordination of care in Bavaria, Germany: analysis of routinely collected claims data BMJ Open |
| title | Impact of the abolition of copayments on the GP-centred coordination of care in Bavaria, Germany: analysis of routinely collected claims data |
| title_full | Impact of the abolition of copayments on the GP-centred coordination of care in Bavaria, Germany: analysis of routinely collected claims data |
| title_fullStr | Impact of the abolition of copayments on the GP-centred coordination of care in Bavaria, Germany: analysis of routinely collected claims data |
| title_full_unstemmed | Impact of the abolition of copayments on the GP-centred coordination of care in Bavaria, Germany: analysis of routinely collected claims data |
| title_short | Impact of the abolition of copayments on the GP-centred coordination of care in Bavaria, Germany: analysis of routinely collected claims data |
| title_sort | impact of the abolition of copayments on the gp centred coordination of care in bavaria germany analysis of routinely collected claims data |
| url | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e035575.full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT wernermaier impactoftheabolitionofcopaymentsonthegpcentredcoordinationofcareinbavariagermanyanalysisofroutinelycollectedclaimsdata AT antoniusschneider impactoftheabolitionofcopaymentsonthegpcentredcoordinationofcareinbavariagermanyanalysisofroutinelycollectedclaimsdata AT larsschwettmann impactoftheabolitionofcopaymentsonthegpcentredcoordinationofcareinbavariagermanyanalysisofroutinelycollectedclaimsdata AT ewandonnachie impactoftheabolitionofcopaymentsonthegpcentredcoordinationofcareinbavariagermanyanalysisofroutinelycollectedclaimsdata AT martintauscher impactoftheabolitionofcopaymentsonthegpcentredcoordinationofcareinbavariagermanyanalysisofroutinelycollectedclaimsdata AT romangerlach impactoftheabolitionofcopaymentsonthegpcentredcoordinationofcareinbavariagermanyanalysisofroutinelycollectedclaimsdata AT klauslinde impactoftheabolitionofcopaymentsonthegpcentredcoordinationofcareinbavariagermanyanalysisofroutinelycollectedclaimsdata AT michaelaolm impactoftheabolitionofcopaymentsonthegpcentredcoordinationofcareinbavariagermanyanalysisofroutinelycollectedclaimsdata |