Revisiting the Scientific Foundations of Forensic Science

The study addresses recent criticisms of forensic science, specifically those pointing to a lack of sound scientific basis behind examination methods. Conclusions are based on the analysis of documents published in the United States, as well as forensic expert practices in Russia. Analysis demonstra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: A. V. Nesterov
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation, Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science 2018-09-01
Series:Теория и практика судебной экспертизы
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tipse.ru/jour/article/view/405
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The study addresses recent criticisms of forensic science, specifically those pointing to a lack of sound scientific basis behind examination methods. Conclusions are based on the analysis of documents published in the United States, as well as forensic expert practices in Russia. Analysis demonstrates both methodological and legal issues with the application of specialized knowledge in the expert form. The use of Karl Popper’s principle to support the scientific status of forensic methods is demonstrated to lack justification, and is therefore debatable.
ISSN:1819-2785
2587-7275