L’indemnisation des travailleurs précaires en Ontario : résistance des employeurs et droit de parole limité pour les victimes de lésions professionnelles

The policies and practices of workers’ compensation have barely kept pace with the changing worker and employer needs created by the growth of precarious forms of employment. This study focused on how well workers’ compensation and RTW policies in Ontario fit the needs of precariously employed worke...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ellen MacEachen, Sonja Senthanar, Katherine Lippel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail (IRSST) 2021-04-01
Series:Perspectives Interdisciplinaires sur le Travail et la Santé
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/pistes/7060
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841551622093668352
author Ellen MacEachen
Sonja Senthanar
Katherine Lippel
author_facet Ellen MacEachen
Sonja Senthanar
Katherine Lippel
author_sort Ellen MacEachen
collection DOAJ
description The policies and practices of workers’ compensation have barely kept pace with the changing worker and employer needs created by the growth of precarious forms of employment. This study focused on how well workers’ compensation and RTW policies in Ontario fit the needs of precariously employed workers. A critical discourse analysis guided our study which consisted of in-depth interviews with 15 precariously-employed workers and 5 employers who had hired and managed these kinds of workers. Three domains where RTW policies fit uneasily with the experiences of precariously-employed workers were identified. These related to knowledge and power contrasts between well-informed employers and vulnerable workers, injury attribution challenges, and worker fear of speaking up about accidents. This study suggests that workers’ compensation and RTW policies rest uneasily with the circumstances of precariously-employed workers. In particular, it was difficult for workers to engage with/make a claim for workers’ compensation when employers resisted this process.
format Article
id doaj-art-e14a1966286640cfa1a1b67ab0511133
institution Kabale University
issn 1481-9384
language English
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail (IRSST)
record_format Article
series Perspectives Interdisciplinaires sur le Travail et la Santé
spelling doaj-art-e14a1966286640cfa1a1b67ab05111332025-01-09T16:01:06ZengInstitut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail (IRSST)Perspectives Interdisciplinaires sur le Travail et la Santé1481-93842021-04-0123110.4000/pistes.7060L’indemnisation des travailleurs précaires en Ontario : résistance des employeurs et droit de parole limité pour les victimes de lésions professionnellesEllen MacEachenSonja SenthanarKatherine LippelThe policies and practices of workers’ compensation have barely kept pace with the changing worker and employer needs created by the growth of precarious forms of employment. This study focused on how well workers’ compensation and RTW policies in Ontario fit the needs of precariously employed workers. A critical discourse analysis guided our study which consisted of in-depth interviews with 15 precariously-employed workers and 5 employers who had hired and managed these kinds of workers. Three domains where RTW policies fit uneasily with the experiences of precariously-employed workers were identified. These related to knowledge and power contrasts between well-informed employers and vulnerable workers, injury attribution challenges, and worker fear of speaking up about accidents. This study suggests that workers’ compensation and RTW policies rest uneasily with the circumstances of precariously-employed workers. In particular, it was difficult for workers to engage with/make a claim for workers’ compensation when employers resisted this process.https://journals.openedition.org/pistes/7060return to workprecarious employmentprecarious workersworker benefitvulnerable workers
spellingShingle Ellen MacEachen
Sonja Senthanar
Katherine Lippel
L’indemnisation des travailleurs précaires en Ontario : résistance des employeurs et droit de parole limité pour les victimes de lésions professionnelles
Perspectives Interdisciplinaires sur le Travail et la Santé
return to work
precarious employment
precarious workers
worker benefit
vulnerable workers
title L’indemnisation des travailleurs précaires en Ontario : résistance des employeurs et droit de parole limité pour les victimes de lésions professionnelles
title_full L’indemnisation des travailleurs précaires en Ontario : résistance des employeurs et droit de parole limité pour les victimes de lésions professionnelles
title_fullStr L’indemnisation des travailleurs précaires en Ontario : résistance des employeurs et droit de parole limité pour les victimes de lésions professionnelles
title_full_unstemmed L’indemnisation des travailleurs précaires en Ontario : résistance des employeurs et droit de parole limité pour les victimes de lésions professionnelles
title_short L’indemnisation des travailleurs précaires en Ontario : résistance des employeurs et droit de parole limité pour les victimes de lésions professionnelles
title_sort l indemnisation des travailleurs precaires en ontario resistance des employeurs et droit de parole limite pour les victimes de lesions professionnelles
topic return to work
precarious employment
precarious workers
worker benefit
vulnerable workers
url https://journals.openedition.org/pistes/7060
work_keys_str_mv AT ellenmaceachen lindemnisationdestravailleursprecairesenontarioresistancedesemployeursetdroitdeparolelimitepourlesvictimesdelesionsprofessionnelles
AT sonjasenthanar lindemnisationdestravailleursprecairesenontarioresistancedesemployeursetdroitdeparolelimitepourlesvictimesdelesionsprofessionnelles
AT katherinelippel lindemnisationdestravailleursprecairesenontarioresistancedesemployeursetdroitdeparolelimitepourlesvictimesdelesionsprofessionnelles