Private Damages Actions in EU Competition Law and Restorative Justice: Towards a New Streamlined Institutional Framework?

The transposition of Directive 2014/104 on private damages actions marks an important development in the setting up of a harmonised private competition law enforcement regime across different EU Member States. Coupled with deterrence-focused public enforcement, the European Union has taken a necess...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pieter Van Cleynenbreugel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Católica Editora 2019-10-01
Series:Market and Competition Law Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/1826
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841563881194913792
author Pieter Van Cleynenbreugel
author_facet Pieter Van Cleynenbreugel
author_sort Pieter Van Cleynenbreugel
collection DOAJ
description The transposition of Directive 2014/104 on private damages actions marks an important development in the setting up of a harmonised private competition law enforcement regime across different EU Member States. Coupled with deterrence-focused public enforcement, the European Union has taken a necessary and welcomed step towards enhancing justice for all those individuals and competitors damaged by competition law infringements. This article argues, however, that the current emphasis on balancing public and private enforcement of the European Commission focuses too little on the need and healing effects of restoration. At the same time, the Directive contains a promising restorative justice opening by virtue of its Article 18. Starting from that opening, the article will propose a more developed way forward, taking the form of the setup and development of so-called antitrust “trust funds”. Exploring the legal possibilities and limits of such funds, the article questions to what extent this approach could be a useful complementary way to overcome the limits identified. It will be submitted that, although it is legally possible to set up those trust funds under EU law, important practical questions have to be addressed prior to doing so. Having outlined the potential features and limits of this approach, the article additionally calls for more and comparative research to be performed in this area.
format Article
id doaj-art-e0835c8811d8418f940728ab532b1c7b
institution Kabale University
issn 2184-0008
language English
publishDate 2019-10-01
publisher Universidade Católica Editora
record_format Article
series Market and Competition Law Review
spelling doaj-art-e0835c8811d8418f940728ab532b1c7b2025-01-02T23:24:31ZengUniversidade Católica EditoraMarket and Competition Law Review2184-00082019-10-013210.7559/mclawreview.2019.1826Private Damages Actions in EU Competition Law and Restorative Justice: Towards a New Streamlined Institutional Framework?Pieter Van Cleynenbreugel0Université de Liège; Université Paris-Dauphine The transposition of Directive 2014/104 on private damages actions marks an important development in the setting up of a harmonised private competition law enforcement regime across different EU Member States. Coupled with deterrence-focused public enforcement, the European Union has taken a necessary and welcomed step towards enhancing justice for all those individuals and competitors damaged by competition law infringements. This article argues, however, that the current emphasis on balancing public and private enforcement of the European Commission focuses too little on the need and healing effects of restoration. At the same time, the Directive contains a promising restorative justice opening by virtue of its Article 18. Starting from that opening, the article will propose a more developed way forward, taking the form of the setup and development of so-called antitrust “trust funds”. Exploring the legal possibilities and limits of such funds, the article questions to what extent this approach could be a useful complementary way to overcome the limits identified. It will be submitted that, although it is legally possible to set up those trust funds under EU law, important practical questions have to be addressed prior to doing so. Having outlined the potential features and limits of this approach, the article additionally calls for more and comparative research to be performed in this area. https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/1826EU competition lawPrivate enforcementDirective 2014/104Restorative justiceCollective actions
spellingShingle Pieter Van Cleynenbreugel
Private Damages Actions in EU Competition Law and Restorative Justice: Towards a New Streamlined Institutional Framework?
Market and Competition Law Review
EU competition law
Private enforcement
Directive 2014/104
Restorative justice
Collective actions
title Private Damages Actions in EU Competition Law and Restorative Justice: Towards a New Streamlined Institutional Framework?
title_full Private Damages Actions in EU Competition Law and Restorative Justice: Towards a New Streamlined Institutional Framework?
title_fullStr Private Damages Actions in EU Competition Law and Restorative Justice: Towards a New Streamlined Institutional Framework?
title_full_unstemmed Private Damages Actions in EU Competition Law and Restorative Justice: Towards a New Streamlined Institutional Framework?
title_short Private Damages Actions in EU Competition Law and Restorative Justice: Towards a New Streamlined Institutional Framework?
title_sort private damages actions in eu competition law and restorative justice towards a new streamlined institutional framework
topic EU competition law
Private enforcement
Directive 2014/104
Restorative justice
Collective actions
url https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/1826
work_keys_str_mv AT pietervancleynenbreugel privatedamagesactionsineucompetitionlawandrestorativejusticetowardsanewstreamlinedinstitutionalframework