Determinants of citation in the literature on diesel exhaust exposure and lung cancer: a citation analysis

Objectives Epidemiological research on the association between diesel exhaust exposure and lung cancer risk has some methodological challenges that give rise to different conclusions and intense debates. This raises the question about the role of selective citation and of citation bias in particular...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bram Duyx, Miriam J E Urlings, Gerard M H Swaen, Lex M Bouter, Maurice P Zeegers
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/10/e033967.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846166015073845248
author Bram Duyx
Miriam J E Urlings
Gerard M H Swaen
Lex M Bouter
Maurice P Zeegers
author_facet Bram Duyx
Miriam J E Urlings
Gerard M H Swaen
Lex M Bouter
Maurice P Zeegers
author_sort Bram Duyx
collection DOAJ
description Objectives Epidemiological research on the association between diesel exhaust exposure and lung cancer risk has some methodological challenges that give rise to different conclusions and intense debates. This raises the question about the role of selective citation and of citation bias in particular. Our aim was to investigate the occurrence and prevalence of selective citation in this field.Design Citation analysis.Setting Web of Science Core Collection.Participants We identified 96 publications in this network, with 4317 potential citations. For each publication, we extracted characteristics such as study conclusion and funding source. Some of these characteristics are related to the study content: study design, sample size, method of diesel exposure assessment, type of diesel technology under investigation, and whether smoking had been adjusted for.Primary and secondary outcome measures Whether a citation occurs or not, measured and analysed according to the preregistered protocol. Exploratively we analysed the association between funding source and study conclusion.Results Methodological content of a study was clearly related to citation, studies using more sophisticated methods were more likely to be cited. There was some evidence for citation bias: supportive publications had a higher chance of being cited than non-supportive ones, but after adjustment for study quality, this effect decreased substantially (adjusted OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.7). Explorative analyses indicated that three quarters of non-profit funded publications had a supportive study conclusion against only one quarter of the industry-funded publications.Conclusions There is evidence for selective citation within this field, but the evidence for citation bias was weak. It seems that factors related to the methodology had more impact on citation than the conclusion of a study. Interestingly, publications that were funded by industry were more skeptical about a causal relationship between diesel exhaust and lung cancer compared to non-profit-funded publications.
format Article
id doaj-art-df96c9c4d594482ea91367cfa5879e30
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-df96c9c4d594482ea91367cfa5879e302024-11-16T11:05:11ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552020-10-01101010.1136/bmjopen-2019-033967Determinants of citation in the literature on diesel exhaust exposure and lung cancer: a citation analysisBram Duyx0Miriam J E Urlings1Gerard M H Swaen2Lex M Bouter3Maurice P Zeegers4CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Limburg, The NetherlandsCAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Limburg, The NetherlandsCAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Limburg, The NetherlandsDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistic, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The NetherlandsCare and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The NetherlandsObjectives Epidemiological research on the association between diesel exhaust exposure and lung cancer risk has some methodological challenges that give rise to different conclusions and intense debates. This raises the question about the role of selective citation and of citation bias in particular. Our aim was to investigate the occurrence and prevalence of selective citation in this field.Design Citation analysis.Setting Web of Science Core Collection.Participants We identified 96 publications in this network, with 4317 potential citations. For each publication, we extracted characteristics such as study conclusion and funding source. Some of these characteristics are related to the study content: study design, sample size, method of diesel exposure assessment, type of diesel technology under investigation, and whether smoking had been adjusted for.Primary and secondary outcome measures Whether a citation occurs or not, measured and analysed according to the preregistered protocol. Exploratively we analysed the association between funding source and study conclusion.Results Methodological content of a study was clearly related to citation, studies using more sophisticated methods were more likely to be cited. There was some evidence for citation bias: supportive publications had a higher chance of being cited than non-supportive ones, but after adjustment for study quality, this effect decreased substantially (adjusted OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.7). Explorative analyses indicated that three quarters of non-profit funded publications had a supportive study conclusion against only one quarter of the industry-funded publications.Conclusions There is evidence for selective citation within this field, but the evidence for citation bias was weak. It seems that factors related to the methodology had more impact on citation than the conclusion of a study. Interestingly, publications that were funded by industry were more skeptical about a causal relationship between diesel exhaust and lung cancer compared to non-profit-funded publications.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/10/e033967.full
spellingShingle Bram Duyx
Miriam J E Urlings
Gerard M H Swaen
Lex M Bouter
Maurice P Zeegers
Determinants of citation in the literature on diesel exhaust exposure and lung cancer: a citation analysis
BMJ Open
title Determinants of citation in the literature on diesel exhaust exposure and lung cancer: a citation analysis
title_full Determinants of citation in the literature on diesel exhaust exposure and lung cancer: a citation analysis
title_fullStr Determinants of citation in the literature on diesel exhaust exposure and lung cancer: a citation analysis
title_full_unstemmed Determinants of citation in the literature on diesel exhaust exposure and lung cancer: a citation analysis
title_short Determinants of citation in the literature on diesel exhaust exposure and lung cancer: a citation analysis
title_sort determinants of citation in the literature on diesel exhaust exposure and lung cancer a citation analysis
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/10/e033967.full
work_keys_str_mv AT bramduyx determinantsofcitationintheliteratureondieselexhaustexposureandlungcanceracitationanalysis
AT miriamjeurlings determinantsofcitationintheliteratureondieselexhaustexposureandlungcanceracitationanalysis
AT gerardmhswaen determinantsofcitationintheliteratureondieselexhaustexposureandlungcanceracitationanalysis
AT lexmbouter determinantsofcitationintheliteratureondieselexhaustexposureandlungcanceracitationanalysis
AT mauricepzeegers determinantsofcitationintheliteratureondieselexhaustexposureandlungcanceracitationanalysis