Telerehabilitation versus face-to-face physical therapy for middle-aged patients with degenerative meniscal tear in China: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial

Objective: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of telerehabilitation to traditional face- to-face physical therapy for patients with degenerative meniscal tears in Shanghai, China. Design: A two-arm, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted across two hospitals in Shangha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiye He, Caiqi Xu, Lihua Huang, Hui Wang, Shengdi Lu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Medical Journals Sweden 2025-08-01
Series:Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://medicaljournalssweden.se/jrm/article/view/43237
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849229129650536448
author Jiye He
Caiqi Xu
Lihua Huang
Hui Wang
Shengdi Lu
author_facet Jiye He
Caiqi Xu
Lihua Huang
Hui Wang
Shengdi Lu
author_sort Jiye He
collection DOAJ
description Objective: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of telerehabilitation to traditional face- to-face physical therapy for patients with degenerative meniscal tears in Shanghai, China. Design: A two-arm, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted across two hospitals in Shanghai, China Subjects/Patients: Participants with clinically diagnosed degenerative meniscal tears were randomly assigned to either the telerehabilitation group or the face-to-face physical therapy group. Methods: Both groups underwent a 12-week intervention. Participants in telerehabilitation group used a digital platform for remote physical therapy, while participants in physical therapy group received traditional clinic-based rehabilitation. A predefined non-inferiority margin of 10 points on the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was applied to determine clinical equivalence between the interventions. Results: Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in knee function and quality of life, with no significant differences in the KOOS, SF-36, or functional tests at any time point (p > 0.05). Both groups had high adherence rates, with no significant differences in exercise completion or satisfaction scores. The TELE group had a significantly lower total cost compared to the PT group (p < 0.001), demonstrating greater cost-effectiveness. Conclusion: Telerehabilitation was found to be clinically non-inferior to face-to-face physical therapy for improving knee function, pain, and quality of life in patients with degenerative meniscal tears. It offered significant cost savings, making it a cost-effective alternative to traditional in-person rehabilitation.
format Article
id doaj-art-defe77c6e6ba46c59357c2de5aa256ce
institution Kabale University
issn 1651-2081
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Medical Journals Sweden
record_format Article
series Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
spelling doaj-art-defe77c6e6ba46c59357c2de5aa256ce2025-08-22T06:18:42ZengMedical Journals SwedenJournal of Rehabilitation Medicine1651-20812025-08-015710.2340/jrm.v57.43237Telerehabilitation versus face-to-face physical therapy for middle-aged patients with degenerative meniscal tear in China: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trialJiye He0Caiqi Xu1Lihua Huang2Hui Wang3Shengdi Lu4Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Sports Medicine, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaShanghai Sixth People's HospitalObjective: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of telerehabilitation to traditional face- to-face physical therapy for patients with degenerative meniscal tears in Shanghai, China. Design: A two-arm, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted across two hospitals in Shanghai, China Subjects/Patients: Participants with clinically diagnosed degenerative meniscal tears were randomly assigned to either the telerehabilitation group or the face-to-face physical therapy group. Methods: Both groups underwent a 12-week intervention. Participants in telerehabilitation group used a digital platform for remote physical therapy, while participants in physical therapy group received traditional clinic-based rehabilitation. A predefined non-inferiority margin of 10 points on the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was applied to determine clinical equivalence between the interventions. Results: Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in knee function and quality of life, with no significant differences in the KOOS, SF-36, or functional tests at any time point (p > 0.05). Both groups had high adherence rates, with no significant differences in exercise completion or satisfaction scores. The TELE group had a significantly lower total cost compared to the PT group (p < 0.001), demonstrating greater cost-effectiveness. Conclusion: Telerehabilitation was found to be clinically non-inferior to face-to-face physical therapy for improving knee function, pain, and quality of life in patients with degenerative meniscal tears. It offered significant cost savings, making it a cost-effective alternative to traditional in-person rehabilitation. https://medicaljournalssweden.se/jrm/article/view/43237cost-benefit analysisknee injurymeniscal tearPhysical Therapy ModalitiesTelerehabilitation
spellingShingle Jiye He
Caiqi Xu
Lihua Huang
Hui Wang
Shengdi Lu
Telerehabilitation versus face-to-face physical therapy for middle-aged patients with degenerative meniscal tear in China: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
cost-benefit analysis
knee injury
meniscal tear
Physical Therapy Modalities
Telerehabilitation
title Telerehabilitation versus face-to-face physical therapy for middle-aged patients with degenerative meniscal tear in China: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
title_full Telerehabilitation versus face-to-face physical therapy for middle-aged patients with degenerative meniscal tear in China: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Telerehabilitation versus face-to-face physical therapy for middle-aged patients with degenerative meniscal tear in China: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Telerehabilitation versus face-to-face physical therapy for middle-aged patients with degenerative meniscal tear in China: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
title_short Telerehabilitation versus face-to-face physical therapy for middle-aged patients with degenerative meniscal tear in China: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
title_sort telerehabilitation versus face to face physical therapy for middle aged patients with degenerative meniscal tear in china a non inferiority randomized controlled trial
topic cost-benefit analysis
knee injury
meniscal tear
Physical Therapy Modalities
Telerehabilitation
url https://medicaljournalssweden.se/jrm/article/view/43237
work_keys_str_mv AT jiyehe telerehabilitationversusfacetofacephysicaltherapyformiddleagedpatientswithdegenerativemeniscaltearinchinaanoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT caiqixu telerehabilitationversusfacetofacephysicaltherapyformiddleagedpatientswithdegenerativemeniscaltearinchinaanoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lihuahuang telerehabilitationversusfacetofacephysicaltherapyformiddleagedpatientswithdegenerativemeniscaltearinchinaanoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT huiwang telerehabilitationversusfacetofacephysicaltherapyformiddleagedpatientswithdegenerativemeniscaltearinchinaanoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shengdilu telerehabilitationversusfacetofacephysicaltherapyformiddleagedpatientswithdegenerativemeniscaltearinchinaanoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial