Comment et pourquoi : proposition d’un modèle d’évaluation des processus de la phase de développement d’interventions ergonomiques

Ergonomic interventions assessed by way of experimental methods appear to be over-simplified when they are limited to a standardized solution for a large number of workers. These interventions differ greatly from interventions provided by ergonomists out in the field who carry out a complex, partici...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Valérie Albert, Nicole Vézina, Henriette Bilodeau, Fabien Coutarel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail (IRSST) 2017-11-01
Series:Perspectives Interdisciplinaires sur le Travail et la Santé
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/pistes/5513
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841551621140512768
author Valérie Albert
Nicole Vézina
Henriette Bilodeau
Fabien Coutarel
author_facet Valérie Albert
Nicole Vézina
Henriette Bilodeau
Fabien Coutarel
author_sort Valérie Albert
collection DOAJ
description Ergonomic interventions assessed by way of experimental methods appear to be over-simplified when they are limited to a standardized solution for a large number of workers. These interventions differ greatly from interventions provided by ergonomists out in the field who carry out a complex, participatory, change process closely adapted to an organization’s context. In such complex interventions, ergonomists carry out numerous actions before specific work modifications are implemented, but these actions are almost never mentioned in evaluation studies. The goal of this article is to present the methodological framework of a process evaluation focussing on the development phase of complex ergonomic interventions, the development phase occurring prior to the implementation of work modifications. The collection of quantitative and qualitative data in real time through a logbook, document analysis, and semi-structured interviews is proposed. This process evaluation model should provide knowledge of the actions that led to changes in specific contexts and that may represent the transferable aspect of the intervention to future interventions carried out in similar contexts.
format Article
id doaj-art-dec437e8f46c410780579969bd21e04c
institution Kabale University
issn 1481-9384
language English
publishDate 2017-11-01
publisher Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail (IRSST)
record_format Article
series Perspectives Interdisciplinaires sur le Travail et la Santé
spelling doaj-art-dec437e8f46c410780579969bd21e04c2025-01-09T16:01:33ZengInstitut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail (IRSST)Perspectives Interdisciplinaires sur le Travail et la Santé1481-93842017-11-0119310.4000/pistes.5513Comment et pourquoi : proposition d’un modèle d’évaluation des processus de la phase de développement d’interventions ergonomiquesValérie AlbertNicole VézinaHenriette BilodeauFabien CoutarelErgonomic interventions assessed by way of experimental methods appear to be over-simplified when they are limited to a standardized solution for a large number of workers. These interventions differ greatly from interventions provided by ergonomists out in the field who carry out a complex, participatory, change process closely adapted to an organization’s context. In such complex interventions, ergonomists carry out numerous actions before specific work modifications are implemented, but these actions are almost never mentioned in evaluation studies. The goal of this article is to present the methodological framework of a process evaluation focussing on the development phase of complex ergonomic interventions, the development phase occurring prior to the implementation of work modifications. The collection of quantitative and qualitative data in real time through a logbook, document analysis, and semi-structured interviews is proposed. This process evaluation model should provide knowledge of the actions that led to changes in specific contexts and that may represent the transferable aspect of the intervention to future interventions carried out in similar contexts.https://journals.openedition.org/pistes/5513participatory interventionevaluation researchorganizational-level interventionstakeholdersmental models
spellingShingle Valérie Albert
Nicole Vézina
Henriette Bilodeau
Fabien Coutarel
Comment et pourquoi : proposition d’un modèle d’évaluation des processus de la phase de développement d’interventions ergonomiques
Perspectives Interdisciplinaires sur le Travail et la Santé
participatory intervention
evaluation research
organizational-level intervention
stakeholders
mental models
title Comment et pourquoi : proposition d’un modèle d’évaluation des processus de la phase de développement d’interventions ergonomiques
title_full Comment et pourquoi : proposition d’un modèle d’évaluation des processus de la phase de développement d’interventions ergonomiques
title_fullStr Comment et pourquoi : proposition d’un modèle d’évaluation des processus de la phase de développement d’interventions ergonomiques
title_full_unstemmed Comment et pourquoi : proposition d’un modèle d’évaluation des processus de la phase de développement d’interventions ergonomiques
title_short Comment et pourquoi : proposition d’un modèle d’évaluation des processus de la phase de développement d’interventions ergonomiques
title_sort comment et pourquoi proposition d un modele d evaluation des processus de la phase de developpement d interventions ergonomiques
topic participatory intervention
evaluation research
organizational-level intervention
stakeholders
mental models
url https://journals.openedition.org/pistes/5513
work_keys_str_mv AT valeriealbert commentetpourquoipropositiondunmodeledevaluationdesprocessusdelaphasededeveloppementdinterventionsergonomiques
AT nicolevezina commentetpourquoipropositiondunmodeledevaluationdesprocessusdelaphasededeveloppementdinterventionsergonomiques
AT henriettebilodeau commentetpourquoipropositiondunmodeledevaluationdesprocessusdelaphasededeveloppementdinterventionsergonomiques
AT fabiencoutarel commentetpourquoipropositiondunmodeledevaluationdesprocessusdelaphasededeveloppementdinterventionsergonomiques