A Critical Review on the Book Management Knowledge: A Critical View
Awareness of the scientific status of management studies helps to study it scientifically and produce theoretical and practical knowledge. In “Management Knowledge: A Critical View" Griseri seeks to show that management research lacks the validity criteria to consider it as a scientific field o...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fas |
| Published: |
Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)
2021-05-01
|
| Series: | پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_5919_ccc210e1639b5616ab77484be232bda1.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841555348661469184 |
|---|---|
| author | Hassan Rangriz Mirza ali Saboorynia |
| author_facet | Hassan Rangriz Mirza ali Saboorynia |
| author_sort | Hassan Rangriz |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Awareness of the scientific status of management studies helps to study it scientifically and produce theoretical and practical knowledge. In “Management Knowledge: A Critical View" Griseri seeks to show that management research lacks the validity criteria to consider it as a scientific field of study. Therefore, he tries to justify it in terms of its usefulness. The author discusses the issues in a challenging and controversial way, but this book has a difficult text for students and even professors of management. This critique seeks to explain the shortcomings of the author's views on the definition of a scientific study and biases with them. With this regard, the researcher has argued that with incomplete definitions of the concepts of validity, scientific study, usefulness, and proof Griseri has contributed to the complexity of this issue. He also has a limited approach to methodology as a validating criterion but sees it as a means of proof. Looking at different types of validity, it becomes clear that management research validity is not different from its usefulness. The methodology also creates social objectivity by forming a common understanding between researchers. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-deb3655e85304b13b1770bfefe375ed3 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2383-1650 |
| language | fas |
| publishDate | 2021-05-01 |
| publisher | Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی |
| spelling | doaj-art-deb3655e85304b13b1770bfefe375ed32025-01-08T05:43:03ZfasInstitute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی2383-16502021-05-0121314116310.30465/crtls.2020.15826.12305919A Critical Review on the Book Management Knowledge: A Critical ViewHassan Rangriz0Mirza ali Saboorynia1Associate Professor, Department of Human Resource Management and Business Administration, Kharazmi University, Tehran, IranPhD Candidate in Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, IranAwareness of the scientific status of management studies helps to study it scientifically and produce theoretical and practical knowledge. In “Management Knowledge: A Critical View" Griseri seeks to show that management research lacks the validity criteria to consider it as a scientific field of study. Therefore, he tries to justify it in terms of its usefulness. The author discusses the issues in a challenging and controversial way, but this book has a difficult text for students and even professors of management. This critique seeks to explain the shortcomings of the author's views on the definition of a scientific study and biases with them. With this regard, the researcher has argued that with incomplete definitions of the concepts of validity, scientific study, usefulness, and proof Griseri has contributed to the complexity of this issue. He also has a limited approach to methodology as a validating criterion but sees it as a means of proof. Looking at different types of validity, it becomes clear that management research validity is not different from its usefulness. The methodology also creates social objectivity by forming a common understanding between researchers.https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_5919_ccc210e1639b5616ab77484be232bda1.pdfmanagement researchmanagement knowledgemanagement research validitymanagement utilityphilosophy of management |
| spellingShingle | Hassan Rangriz Mirza ali Saboorynia A Critical Review on the Book Management Knowledge: A Critical View پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی management research management knowledge management research validity management utility philosophy of management |
| title | A Critical Review on the Book Management Knowledge: A Critical View |
| title_full | A Critical Review on the Book Management Knowledge: A Critical View |
| title_fullStr | A Critical Review on the Book Management Knowledge: A Critical View |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Critical Review on the Book Management Knowledge: A Critical View |
| title_short | A Critical Review on the Book Management Knowledge: A Critical View |
| title_sort | critical review on the book management knowledge a critical view |
| topic | management research management knowledge management research validity management utility philosophy of management |
| url | https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_5919_ccc210e1639b5616ab77484be232bda1.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hassanrangriz acriticalreviewonthebookmanagementknowledgeacriticalview AT mirzaalisaboorynia acriticalreviewonthebookmanagementknowledgeacriticalview AT hassanrangriz criticalreviewonthebookmanagementknowledgeacriticalview AT mirzaalisaboorynia criticalreviewonthebookmanagementknowledgeacriticalview |