Bohuslaus of Lobkowicz and Hassenstein. A Poet between Nations and Denominations

Bohuslaus of Lobkowicz and Hassenstein (ca. 1461–1510), a Bohemian nobleman and outstanding Latin poet, is remarkable for the rich and contradictory ways in which his personality was interpreted up to the twentieth century. Although a fervent Cat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marta Vaculínová
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Jagiellonian University 2024-12-01
Series:Terminus
Online Access: https://ejournals.eu/czasopismo/terminus/artykul/bohuslaus-of-lobkowicz-and-hassenstein-a-poet-between-nations-and-denominations
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841554811442429952
author Marta Vaculínová
author_facet Marta Vaculínová
author_sort Marta Vaculínová
collection DOAJ
description Bohuslaus of Lobkowicz and Hassenstein (ca. 1461–1510), a Bohemian nobleman and outstanding Latin poet, is remarkable for the rich and contradictory ways in which his personality was interpreted up to the twentieth century. Although a fervent Catholic, in the sixteenth century he became a model for Czech non-Catholic humanists of Wittenberg training, for whom he represented a hero who liberated his country from barbarism. The Catholics did not “take him back” until long after the defeat of the non-Catholic Estates, and in the second half of the seventeenth century the Jesuits presented a legend of him as a poet laureate of the Pope himself. In parallel, his legacy lived on in the German Lutheran lands, where his first brief monograph was written and reprints of his works were published. The Enlightenment provided a less polarizing view of Hassenstein, though paradoxically it was a Jesuit, Ignatius Cornova, who has written the most comprehensive monograph on Hassenstein to date. Although Cornova tried to take a balanced view, even he could not avoid using psychologizing conclusions to describe Hassenstein in a way that suited his pedagogical purposes, even if in so doing he had to suppress or distort some facts. After the Enlightenment, the confessional aspect lost its urgency, and another conflicting issue arose in the presentation of Hassenstein—his belonging to a certain nation. Throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, scholars argued over whether he was Czech or German. These debates faithfully mirrored contemporary political developments, and only ended after World War II, when modern editions of Hassenstein’s works and the scholarly studies by their editors, Dana Martínková and Jan Martínek, provided an objective view of Hassenstein as a humanist writer and historical figure.
format Article
id doaj-art-ddedab10a72840f1868ccd86997d71fb
institution Kabale University
issn 2082-0984
2084-3844
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Jagiellonian University
record_format Article
series Terminus
spelling doaj-art-ddedab10a72840f1868ccd86997d71fb2025-01-08T10:19:04ZengJagiellonian UniversityTerminus2082-09842084-38442024-12-012024325526910.4467/20843844TE.24.015.20392Bohuslaus of Lobkowicz and Hassenstein. A Poet between Nations and DenominationsMarta Vaculínová0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1454-8224 Czech Academy of Sciences Bohuslaus of Lobkowicz and Hassenstein (ca. 1461–1510), a Bohemian nobleman and outstanding Latin poet, is remarkable for the rich and contradictory ways in which his personality was interpreted up to the twentieth century. Although a fervent Catholic, in the sixteenth century he became a model for Czech non-Catholic humanists of Wittenberg training, for whom he represented a hero who liberated his country from barbarism. The Catholics did not “take him back” until long after the defeat of the non-Catholic Estates, and in the second half of the seventeenth century the Jesuits presented a legend of him as a poet laureate of the Pope himself. In parallel, his legacy lived on in the German Lutheran lands, where his first brief monograph was written and reprints of his works were published. The Enlightenment provided a less polarizing view of Hassenstein, though paradoxically it was a Jesuit, Ignatius Cornova, who has written the most comprehensive monograph on Hassenstein to date. Although Cornova tried to take a balanced view, even he could not avoid using psychologizing conclusions to describe Hassenstein in a way that suited his pedagogical purposes, even if in so doing he had to suppress or distort some facts. After the Enlightenment, the confessional aspect lost its urgency, and another conflicting issue arose in the presentation of Hassenstein—his belonging to a certain nation. Throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, scholars argued over whether he was Czech or German. These debates faithfully mirrored contemporary political developments, and only ended after World War II, when modern editions of Hassenstein’s works and the scholarly studies by their editors, Dana Martínková and Jan Martínek, provided an objective view of Hassenstein as a humanist writer and historical figure. https://ejournals.eu/czasopismo/terminus/artykul/bohuslaus-of-lobkowicz-and-hassenstein-a-poet-between-nations-and-denominations
spellingShingle Marta Vaculínová
Bohuslaus of Lobkowicz and Hassenstein. A Poet between Nations and Denominations
Terminus
title Bohuslaus of Lobkowicz and Hassenstein. A Poet between Nations and Denominations
title_full Bohuslaus of Lobkowicz and Hassenstein. A Poet between Nations and Denominations
title_fullStr Bohuslaus of Lobkowicz and Hassenstein. A Poet between Nations and Denominations
title_full_unstemmed Bohuslaus of Lobkowicz and Hassenstein. A Poet between Nations and Denominations
title_short Bohuslaus of Lobkowicz and Hassenstein. A Poet between Nations and Denominations
title_sort bohuslaus of lobkowicz and hassenstein a poet between nations and denominations
url https://ejournals.eu/czasopismo/terminus/artykul/bohuslaus-of-lobkowicz-and-hassenstein-a-poet-between-nations-and-denominations
work_keys_str_mv AT martavaculinova bohuslausoflobkowiczandhassensteinapoetbetweennationsanddenominations