Clinical Outcome and Quality of Life after Modular Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Comparison with Joint‐Preserving Locking Plate Osteosynthesis in Aged Patients: A Retrospective Comparison Study

Objectives Proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) show a high incidence in aged patients. While nondisplaced fractures achieve good results by conservative treatment, surgical procedures are discussed controversially. Next to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), the primary use of reverse shoulde...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carina Jaekel, Lisa Oezel, Franziska Leibnitz, Lena Marie Wilms, Joachim Windolf, Sebastian Viktor Gehrmann, Armin Olaf Scholz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:Orthopaedic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14236
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841527136859455488
author Carina Jaekel
Lisa Oezel
Franziska Leibnitz
Lena Marie Wilms
Joachim Windolf
Sebastian Viktor Gehrmann
Armin Olaf Scholz
author_facet Carina Jaekel
Lisa Oezel
Franziska Leibnitz
Lena Marie Wilms
Joachim Windolf
Sebastian Viktor Gehrmann
Armin Olaf Scholz
author_sort Carina Jaekel
collection DOAJ
description Objectives Proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) show a high incidence in aged patients. While nondisplaced fractures achieve good results by conservative treatment, surgical procedures are discussed controversially. Next to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), the primary use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has become increasingly important. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical function, activities of daily living (ADL), as well as pain assessment in patients with PHFs, treated by ORIF or RSA. Methods A retrospective comparison study was assessed. From November 2011 to March 2016, 34 patients (17 matched pairs) that had undergone either ORIF or RSA of the proximal humerus, were included in this study. Pain was measured by numeric rating scale (NRS). ADL were obtained by Katz‐Index and SF‐12. Moreover, shoulder function was assessed using the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS). The maximum range of motion (ROM) was also recorded. From November 2011 to March 2016, 34 patients (17 matched pairs) that had undergone either ORIF (Figure or RSA of the proximal humerus) were included in this study. For statistical analyses, Student's t‐test, Wilcoxon test, and Chi‐Quadrat test were used. Statistical significance was indicated with p < 0.05. Results Totally 34 patients with an average age of 76.6 years were included. Surgical treatment was performed on average 5.2 days after diagnosis, differing significantly between the two groups (RSA/ORIF: 6.9/3.5 days) The operation time of RSA (97 min) was significantly longer than for ORIF (78 min). Pain assessment, as well as the Katz‐Index and the SF‐12, showed no significant differences. Moreover, clinical shoulder function showed no significant discrepancies between the two surgical techniques. Conclusions Aged patients with PHFs treated with RSA display similar results regarding clinical function, ADL as well as pain perception compared with ORIF. However, revision surgery rate was lower in patients who underwent RSA. Thus, the surgical treatment of PHFs by RSA represents an excellent alternative, especially with regard to an aging patient population.
format Article
id doaj-art-dd531fd746ad4876b2f76d45fcaa74fa
institution Kabale University
issn 1757-7853
1757-7861
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Orthopaedic Surgery
spelling doaj-art-dd531fd746ad4876b2f76d45fcaa74fa2025-01-16T05:31:15ZengWileyOrthopaedic Surgery1757-78531757-78612025-01-0117122423210.1111/os.14236Clinical Outcome and Quality of Life after Modular Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Comparison with Joint‐Preserving Locking Plate Osteosynthesis in Aged Patients: A Retrospective Comparison StudyCarina Jaekel0Lisa Oezel1Franziska Leibnitz2Lena Marie Wilms3Joachim Windolf4Sebastian Viktor Gehrmann5Armin Olaf Scholz6Department for Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf Heinrich‐Heine‐University Düsseldorf Dusseldorf GermanyDepartment for Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf Heinrich‐Heine‐University Düsseldorf Dusseldorf GermanyDepartment for Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf Heinrich‐Heine‐University Düsseldorf Dusseldorf GermanyDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty Heinrich‐Heine‐University Düsseldorf Dusseldorf GermanyDepartment for Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf Heinrich‐Heine‐University Düsseldorf Dusseldorf GermanyDepartment for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery Katholisches Karl‐Leisner‐Klinikum Kleve GermanyDepartment for Hand‐, Foot‐, Trauma‐ and Orthopedic Surgery Hermann‐Josef‐Krankenhaus Erkelenz GermanyObjectives Proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) show a high incidence in aged patients. While nondisplaced fractures achieve good results by conservative treatment, surgical procedures are discussed controversially. Next to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), the primary use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has become increasingly important. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical function, activities of daily living (ADL), as well as pain assessment in patients with PHFs, treated by ORIF or RSA. Methods A retrospective comparison study was assessed. From November 2011 to March 2016, 34 patients (17 matched pairs) that had undergone either ORIF or RSA of the proximal humerus, were included in this study. Pain was measured by numeric rating scale (NRS). ADL were obtained by Katz‐Index and SF‐12. Moreover, shoulder function was assessed using the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS). The maximum range of motion (ROM) was also recorded. From November 2011 to March 2016, 34 patients (17 matched pairs) that had undergone either ORIF (Figure or RSA of the proximal humerus) were included in this study. For statistical analyses, Student's t‐test, Wilcoxon test, and Chi‐Quadrat test were used. Statistical significance was indicated with p < 0.05. Results Totally 34 patients with an average age of 76.6 years were included. Surgical treatment was performed on average 5.2 days after diagnosis, differing significantly between the two groups (RSA/ORIF: 6.9/3.5 days) The operation time of RSA (97 min) was significantly longer than for ORIF (78 min). Pain assessment, as well as the Katz‐Index and the SF‐12, showed no significant differences. Moreover, clinical shoulder function showed no significant discrepancies between the two surgical techniques. Conclusions Aged patients with PHFs treated with RSA display similar results regarding clinical function, ADL as well as pain perception compared with ORIF. However, revision surgery rate was lower in patients who underwent RSA. Thus, the surgical treatment of PHFs by RSA represents an excellent alternative, especially with regard to an aging patient population.https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14236Aged PatientsLocking Plate Osteosynthesis, OsteoporosisProximal Humeral FractureReoperationReverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
spellingShingle Carina Jaekel
Lisa Oezel
Franziska Leibnitz
Lena Marie Wilms
Joachim Windolf
Sebastian Viktor Gehrmann
Armin Olaf Scholz
Clinical Outcome and Quality of Life after Modular Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Comparison with Joint‐Preserving Locking Plate Osteosynthesis in Aged Patients: A Retrospective Comparison Study
Orthopaedic Surgery
Aged Patients
Locking Plate Osteosynthesis, Osteoporosis
Proximal Humeral Fracture
Reoperation
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
title Clinical Outcome and Quality of Life after Modular Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Comparison with Joint‐Preserving Locking Plate Osteosynthesis in Aged Patients: A Retrospective Comparison Study
title_full Clinical Outcome and Quality of Life after Modular Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Comparison with Joint‐Preserving Locking Plate Osteosynthesis in Aged Patients: A Retrospective Comparison Study
title_fullStr Clinical Outcome and Quality of Life after Modular Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Comparison with Joint‐Preserving Locking Plate Osteosynthesis in Aged Patients: A Retrospective Comparison Study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Outcome and Quality of Life after Modular Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Comparison with Joint‐Preserving Locking Plate Osteosynthesis in Aged Patients: A Retrospective Comparison Study
title_short Clinical Outcome and Quality of Life after Modular Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Comparison with Joint‐Preserving Locking Plate Osteosynthesis in Aged Patients: A Retrospective Comparison Study
title_sort clinical outcome and quality of life after modular reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in comparison with joint preserving locking plate osteosynthesis in aged patients a retrospective comparison study
topic Aged Patients
Locking Plate Osteosynthesis, Osteoporosis
Proximal Humeral Fracture
Reoperation
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
url https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14236
work_keys_str_mv AT carinajaekel clinicaloutcomeandqualityoflifeaftermodularreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyincomparisonwithjointpreservinglockingplateosteosynthesisinagedpatientsaretrospectivecomparisonstudy
AT lisaoezel clinicaloutcomeandqualityoflifeaftermodularreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyincomparisonwithjointpreservinglockingplateosteosynthesisinagedpatientsaretrospectivecomparisonstudy
AT franziskaleibnitz clinicaloutcomeandqualityoflifeaftermodularreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyincomparisonwithjointpreservinglockingplateosteosynthesisinagedpatientsaretrospectivecomparisonstudy
AT lenamariewilms clinicaloutcomeandqualityoflifeaftermodularreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyincomparisonwithjointpreservinglockingplateosteosynthesisinagedpatientsaretrospectivecomparisonstudy
AT joachimwindolf clinicaloutcomeandqualityoflifeaftermodularreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyincomparisonwithjointpreservinglockingplateosteosynthesisinagedpatientsaretrospectivecomparisonstudy
AT sebastianviktorgehrmann clinicaloutcomeandqualityoflifeaftermodularreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyincomparisonwithjointpreservinglockingplateosteosynthesisinagedpatientsaretrospectivecomparisonstudy
AT arminolafscholz clinicaloutcomeandqualityoflifeaftermodularreversetotalshoulderarthroplastyincomparisonwithjointpreservinglockingplateosteosynthesisinagedpatientsaretrospectivecomparisonstudy