Refining Theories of Change
Background: Despite the disparities in how they are defined and what elements are included, most Theories of Change remain consistent in one way – their visual format. Typically, Theories of Change are presented as a one-page visual in a flowchart style with lines and boxes of uniform size. In addit...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
The Evaluation Center at Western Michigan University
2018-04-01
|
| Series: | Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.sfu.ca/jmde/index.php/jmde_1/article/view/496 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Background: Despite the disparities in how they are defined and what elements are included, most Theories of Change remain consistent in one way – their visual format. Typically, Theories of Change are presented as a one-page visual in a flowchart style with lines and boxes of uniform size. In addition, Theories of Change are often created as stand-alone tools that are rarely linked effectively to other organizational tools.
Purpose: The authors: (1) propose the essential elements that contribute to robust Theories of Change and clarify the characteristics that distinguish Theories of Change from other organizational tools and formats; (2) suggest additional elements for inclusion in the Theory of Change; (3) present graphic alternatives that allow for an evolution in representing their complexity and depth; and (4) provide ways to link Theories of Change to other organizational tools to increase organizational alignment, efficiency, and, most importantly, impact.
Research Design: NA
Data Collection and Analysis: NA
Setting: NA
Intervention: NA
Findings: NA
|
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1556-8180 |