Limits, limitations, and outer boundaries of antitrust: censorship, free speech, and dominance

Big Tech undertakings have much power over what information becomes available online. Concerns have been voiced in this context that some of their content moderation practices may amount to private censorship and a restriction of free speech. Antitrust enforcement could be looked at as one of possi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jan Polański
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Católica Editora 2023-10-01
Series:Market and Competition Law Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/15891
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841563950866497536
author Jan Polański
author_facet Jan Polański
author_sort Jan Polański
collection DOAJ
description Big Tech undertakings have much power over what information becomes available online. Concerns have been voiced in this context that some of their content moderation practices may amount to private censorship and a restriction of free speech. Antitrust enforcement could be looked at as one of possible remedies to the risks associated with the use of market power to stifle free speech, since the prohibition of abuse of dominant position is very open-textured. Still, even assuming that an undertaking is dominant, antitrust has its limits and limitations which put free speech cases closer to the outer boundaries of antitrust rather than its core. This article explores those outer boundaries of antitrust and speculates whether private censorship could be framed as an abuse of dominant position. To do so, it discusses the limits and limitations of antitrust and then provides five perspectives from which private censorship could be looked at under antitrust. It concludes that while free speech might seem to constitute a political interest of no relevance to orthodox antitrust enforcement, it is possible to consider it under antitrust to relieve some social tensions generated by mostly unchecked power of large undertakings over speech. While a classic consumer welfare standard perspective can be preserved, more novel types of approaches also remain available, yet they would likely face similar problems as those discussed in the article, i.e., the problem of designing workable standards of assessment.
format Article
id doaj-art-dcaa4e0d2ae04acaa0babfc9bb467e44
institution Kabale University
issn 2184-0008
language English
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Universidade Católica Editora
record_format Article
series Market and Competition Law Review
spelling doaj-art-dcaa4e0d2ae04acaa0babfc9bb467e442025-01-02T23:23:36ZengUniversidade Católica EditoraMarket and Competition Law Review2184-00082023-10-017210.34632/mclawreview.2023.15891Limits, limitations, and outer boundaries of antitrust: censorship, free speech, and dominanceJan Polański0Utrecht University School of Law Big Tech undertakings have much power over what information becomes available online. Concerns have been voiced in this context that some of their content moderation practices may amount to private censorship and a restriction of free speech. Antitrust enforcement could be looked at as one of possible remedies to the risks associated with the use of market power to stifle free speech, since the prohibition of abuse of dominant position is very open-textured. Still, even assuming that an undertaking is dominant, antitrust has its limits and limitations which put free speech cases closer to the outer boundaries of antitrust rather than its core. This article explores those outer boundaries of antitrust and speculates whether private censorship could be framed as an abuse of dominant position. To do so, it discusses the limits and limitations of antitrust and then provides five perspectives from which private censorship could be looked at under antitrust. It concludes that while free speech might seem to constitute a political interest of no relevance to orthodox antitrust enforcement, it is possible to consider it under antitrust to relieve some social tensions generated by mostly unchecked power of large undertakings over speech. While a classic consumer welfare standard perspective can be preserved, more novel types of approaches also remain available, yet they would likely face similar problems as those discussed in the article, i.e., the problem of designing workable standards of assessment. https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/15891free speechcensorshipnon-economic interestspublic goalsconsumer welfare
spellingShingle Jan Polański
Limits, limitations, and outer boundaries of antitrust: censorship, free speech, and dominance
Market and Competition Law Review
free speech
censorship
non-economic interests
public goals
consumer welfare
title Limits, limitations, and outer boundaries of antitrust: censorship, free speech, and dominance
title_full Limits, limitations, and outer boundaries of antitrust: censorship, free speech, and dominance
title_fullStr Limits, limitations, and outer boundaries of antitrust: censorship, free speech, and dominance
title_full_unstemmed Limits, limitations, and outer boundaries of antitrust: censorship, free speech, and dominance
title_short Limits, limitations, and outer boundaries of antitrust: censorship, free speech, and dominance
title_sort limits limitations and outer boundaries of antitrust censorship free speech and dominance
topic free speech
censorship
non-economic interests
public goals
consumer welfare
url https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/15891
work_keys_str_mv AT janpolanski limitslimitationsandouterboundariesofantitrustcensorshipfreespeechanddominance