Investigating the possibility of consensus from the perspective of Imami jurisprudence

At first glance, it may seem that many Imami jurists take the possibility of consensus for granted, while this will depend on our accepted definition of consensus and the basis of its authority. With definitions of consensus based on sense, conjecture, and grace, it is usually impossible for that to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad Mahdi Esmaelpour, Mohammad Hasan Haeri, Mohammad Taghi Ghabooli
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Semnan University 2023-05-01
Series:مطالعات فقه و حقوق اسلامی
Subjects:
Online Access:https://feqh.semnan.ac.ir/article_7913_828702fc3500bb79ff247d199fb75d4c.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846136140365561856
author Mohammad Mahdi Esmaelpour
Mohammad Hasan Haeri
Mohammad Taghi Ghabooli
author_facet Mohammad Mahdi Esmaelpour
Mohammad Hasan Haeri
Mohammad Taghi Ghabooli
author_sort Mohammad Mahdi Esmaelpour
collection DOAJ
description At first glance, it may seem that many Imami jurists take the possibility of consensus for granted, while this will depend on our accepted definition of consensus and the basis of its authority. With definitions of consensus based on sense, conjecture, and grace, it is usually impossible for that to happen. From the author's point of view, it is impossible for all jurists in all ages with different tastes and intellectual backgrounds to issue fatwas in matters for which there is no valid evidence from verses and hadiths, and in case of such an agreement, a reassuring solution to know the fatwa. Not all jurists will exist. It seems that only if we accept the authority of consensus on the basis of reason, its occurrence will be in the position of proof and proof without hindrance, because in this case it is not necessary to study the opinion of all jurists, but the consent of most jurists or The famous people in the on the subject of consensus and the absence of the opposite promise ensures that the shari'ah agrees with on the subject of consensus. This research tries to examine the possibility of realizing consensus by re-reading the accepted definitions of consensus among Imami jurists and the principles of its authority.
format Article
id doaj-art-dc7b503e7c4d474a9c88bbc8eb44cab3
institution Kabale University
issn 2008-7012
2717-0330
language fas
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Semnan University
record_format Article
series مطالعات فقه و حقوق اسلامی
spelling doaj-art-dc7b503e7c4d474a9c88bbc8eb44cab32024-12-09T08:44:01ZfasSemnan Universityمطالعات فقه و حقوق اسلامی2008-70122717-03302023-05-01153017720410.22075/feqh.2022.23628.28977913Investigating the possibility of consensus from the perspective of Imami jurisprudenceMohammad Mahdi Esmaelpour0Mohammad Hasan Haeri1Mohammad Taghi Ghabooli2Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Law / Shahid Motahari Faculty of Theology / Ferdowsi University of MashhadProfessor, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad / Faculty of Theology and Islamic StudiesFerdowsi UniversityAt first glance, it may seem that many Imami jurists take the possibility of consensus for granted, while this will depend on our accepted definition of consensus and the basis of its authority. With definitions of consensus based on sense, conjecture, and grace, it is usually impossible for that to happen. From the author's point of view, it is impossible for all jurists in all ages with different tastes and intellectual backgrounds to issue fatwas in matters for which there is no valid evidence from verses and hadiths, and in case of such an agreement, a reassuring solution to know the fatwa. Not all jurists will exist. It seems that only if we accept the authority of consensus on the basis of reason, its occurrence will be in the position of proof and proof without hindrance, because in this case it is not necessary to study the opinion of all jurists, but the consent of most jurists or The famous people in the on the subject of consensus and the absence of the opposite promise ensures that the shari'ah agrees with on the subject of consensus. This research tries to examine the possibility of realizing consensus by re-reading the accepted definitions of consensus among Imami jurists and the principles of its authority.https://feqh.semnan.ac.ir/article_7913_828702fc3500bb79ff247d199fb75d4c.pdfconsensusthe possibility of a consensusthe possibility to occurrence of a consensusno disagreement(vefaq)reputation (shohrat)(madraki)(mohtamal -ul- madrak)
spellingShingle Mohammad Mahdi Esmaelpour
Mohammad Hasan Haeri
Mohammad Taghi Ghabooli
Investigating the possibility of consensus from the perspective of Imami jurisprudence
مطالعات فقه و حقوق اسلامی
consensus
the possibility of a consensus
the possibility to occurrence of a consensus
no disagreement
(vefaq)
reputation (shohrat)
(madraki)
(mohtamal -ul- madrak)
title Investigating the possibility of consensus from the perspective of Imami jurisprudence
title_full Investigating the possibility of consensus from the perspective of Imami jurisprudence
title_fullStr Investigating the possibility of consensus from the perspective of Imami jurisprudence
title_full_unstemmed Investigating the possibility of consensus from the perspective of Imami jurisprudence
title_short Investigating the possibility of consensus from the perspective of Imami jurisprudence
title_sort investigating the possibility of consensus from the perspective of imami jurisprudence
topic consensus
the possibility of a consensus
the possibility to occurrence of a consensus
no disagreement
(vefaq)
reputation (shohrat)
(madraki)
(mohtamal -ul- madrak)
url https://feqh.semnan.ac.ir/article_7913_828702fc3500bb79ff247d199fb75d4c.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadmahdiesmaelpour investigatingthepossibilityofconsensusfromtheperspectiveofimamijurisprudence
AT mohammadhasanhaeri investigatingthepossibilityofconsensusfromtheperspectiveofimamijurisprudence
AT mohammadtaghighabooli investigatingthepossibilityofconsensusfromtheperspectiveofimamijurisprudence