ID196 Quality of studies submitted for incorporation of non-pharmaceutical technologies

Introdução Hospitals employing Health Technology Assessment (HTA) methodologies to support technology incorporation decisions commonly require the presentation of clinical studies as a basis for the request for incorporation by the relevant professional or department. Various factors influence th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Isabela Diniz Gusmão de Oliveira, Tayna Felicissimo Gomes de Souza Bandeira, Natália Morel Cerva, André Luís Ferreira de Azeredo da Silva, Maria Angélica Pires Ferreira
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Instituto Nacional de Assistência Farmacêutica e Farmacoeconomia 2024-11-01
Series:Jornal de Assistência Farmacêutica e Farmacoeconomia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.jaff.org.br/ojs/index.php/jaff/article/view/1001
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846143313401348096
author Isabela Diniz Gusmão de Oliveira
Tayna Felicissimo Gomes de Souza Bandeira
Natália Morel Cerva
André Luís Ferreira de Azeredo da Silva
Maria Angélica Pires Ferreira
author_facet Isabela Diniz Gusmão de Oliveira
Tayna Felicissimo Gomes de Souza Bandeira
Natália Morel Cerva
André Luís Ferreira de Azeredo da Silva
Maria Angélica Pires Ferreira
author_sort Isabela Diniz Gusmão de Oliveira
collection DOAJ
description Introdução Hospitals employing Health Technology Assessment (HTA) methodologies to support technology incorporation decisions commonly require the presentation of clinical studies as a basis for the request for incorporation by the relevant professional or department. Various factors influence the selection of presented studies, including conflicts of interest, confirmation bias, and whether systematic methods were used in evidence retrieval. This study aims to evaluate the quality of studies presented to support the incorporation of non-pharmaceutical technologies. Métodos We conducted a review of submissions made by the clinical staff of a university hospital between 2018 and 2023. Information regarding the submitted studies, complementary searches conducted by the Health Technology Assessment Unit (HTAU), and their application in the issued recommendations were collected. The collected data were organized into tables and analyzed descriptively. Resultados A total of 36 non-pharmaceutical technologies related to incorporation were identified, including medical equipment, devices, orthoses, prostheses, and special materials. The average number of studies attached per request was 3.0 (±2.6). Sixteen submissions (44.4%) were based on controlled clinical trials (intervention) studies, with 8 systematic literature reviews (SLR) of clinical trials, 03 randomized clinical trials (RCT), 02 systematic literature reviews of diagnostic accuracy and 03 quasi-experimental studies (QE). Among the technologies that were based on experimental studies, 06 had a favorable recommendation and 10 unfavorable. Of the 20 technologies supported by observational studies, 09 contained RSL, 04 single-arm studies, 06 comparative studies and 01 case series only. Of the technologies that were based on observational studies, 10 obtained a favorable recommendation and 7 unfavorable. Discussão e conclusões According to the GRADE approach, the randomized clinical trial (RCT) is the most appropriate study design to assess intervention effectiveness, providing greater reliability and bias control. The quality of scientific evidence is a critical factor underpinning incorporation decisions. Our results indicate that, among intervention- -based technologies, only a limited number received favorable recommendations, primarily supported by high-quality RCTs or SLRs of these trials. Observational studies also played a significant role, provided they were well-conducted. However, it is important to acknowledge the higher potential for bias in these studies. Familiarity with HTA principles is essential for technology stakeholders and decision-makers to optimize the process of requesting and incorporating non-pharmaceutical technologies in the hospital context.
format Article
id doaj-art-dbd6feb945be4bc7b8febce49978da1a
institution Kabale University
issn 2525-5010
2525-7323
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher Instituto Nacional de Assistência Farmacêutica e Farmacoeconomia
record_format Article
series Jornal de Assistência Farmacêutica e Farmacoeconomia
spelling doaj-art-dbd6feb945be4bc7b8febce49978da1a2024-12-02T19:57:07ZengInstituto Nacional de Assistência Farmacêutica e FarmacoeconomiaJornal de Assistência Farmacêutica e Farmacoeconomia2525-50102525-73232024-11-019s. 110.22563/2525-7323.2024.v9.s1.p.144ID196 Quality of studies submitted for incorporation of non-pharmaceutical technologiesIsabela Diniz Gusmão de OliveiraTayna Felicissimo Gomes de Souza BandeiraNatália Morel CervaAndré Luís Ferreira de Azeredo da SilvaMaria Angélica Pires Ferreira Introdução Hospitals employing Health Technology Assessment (HTA) methodologies to support technology incorporation decisions commonly require the presentation of clinical studies as a basis for the request for incorporation by the relevant professional or department. Various factors influence the selection of presented studies, including conflicts of interest, confirmation bias, and whether systematic methods were used in evidence retrieval. This study aims to evaluate the quality of studies presented to support the incorporation of non-pharmaceutical technologies. Métodos We conducted a review of submissions made by the clinical staff of a university hospital between 2018 and 2023. Information regarding the submitted studies, complementary searches conducted by the Health Technology Assessment Unit (HTAU), and their application in the issued recommendations were collected. The collected data were organized into tables and analyzed descriptively. Resultados A total of 36 non-pharmaceutical technologies related to incorporation were identified, including medical equipment, devices, orthoses, prostheses, and special materials. The average number of studies attached per request was 3.0 (±2.6). Sixteen submissions (44.4%) were based on controlled clinical trials (intervention) studies, with 8 systematic literature reviews (SLR) of clinical trials, 03 randomized clinical trials (RCT), 02 systematic literature reviews of diagnostic accuracy and 03 quasi-experimental studies (QE). Among the technologies that were based on experimental studies, 06 had a favorable recommendation and 10 unfavorable. Of the 20 technologies supported by observational studies, 09 contained RSL, 04 single-arm studies, 06 comparative studies and 01 case series only. Of the technologies that were based on observational studies, 10 obtained a favorable recommendation and 7 unfavorable. Discussão e conclusões According to the GRADE approach, the randomized clinical trial (RCT) is the most appropriate study design to assess intervention effectiveness, providing greater reliability and bias control. The quality of scientific evidence is a critical factor underpinning incorporation decisions. Our results indicate that, among intervention- -based technologies, only a limited number received favorable recommendations, primarily supported by high-quality RCTs or SLRs of these trials. Observational studies also played a significant role, provided they were well-conducted. However, it is important to acknowledge the higher potential for bias in these studies. Familiarity with HTA principles is essential for technology stakeholders and decision-makers to optimize the process of requesting and incorporating non-pharmaceutical technologies in the hospital context. https://ojs.jaff.org.br/ojs/index.php/jaff/article/view/1001Evidence; non-drug technologies; incorporation; hospital
spellingShingle Isabela Diniz Gusmão de Oliveira
Tayna Felicissimo Gomes de Souza Bandeira
Natália Morel Cerva
André Luís Ferreira de Azeredo da Silva
Maria Angélica Pires Ferreira
ID196 Quality of studies submitted for incorporation of non-pharmaceutical technologies
Jornal de Assistência Farmacêutica e Farmacoeconomia
Evidence; non-drug technologies; incorporation; hospital
title ID196 Quality of studies submitted for incorporation of non-pharmaceutical technologies
title_full ID196 Quality of studies submitted for incorporation of non-pharmaceutical technologies
title_fullStr ID196 Quality of studies submitted for incorporation of non-pharmaceutical technologies
title_full_unstemmed ID196 Quality of studies submitted for incorporation of non-pharmaceutical technologies
title_short ID196 Quality of studies submitted for incorporation of non-pharmaceutical technologies
title_sort id196 quality of studies submitted for incorporation of non pharmaceutical technologies
topic Evidence; non-drug technologies; incorporation; hospital
url https://ojs.jaff.org.br/ojs/index.php/jaff/article/view/1001
work_keys_str_mv AT isabeladinizgusmaodeoliveira id196qualityofstudiessubmittedforincorporationofnonpharmaceuticaltechnologies
AT taynafelicissimogomesdesouzabandeira id196qualityofstudiessubmittedforincorporationofnonpharmaceuticaltechnologies
AT nataliamorelcerva id196qualityofstudiessubmittedforincorporationofnonpharmaceuticaltechnologies
AT andreluisferreiradeazeredodasilva id196qualityofstudiessubmittedforincorporationofnonpharmaceuticaltechnologies
AT mariaangelicapiresferreira id196qualityofstudiessubmittedforincorporationofnonpharmaceuticaltechnologies