Role of Magnetic Resonance Arthrography (MRA) in the Diagnosis of Shoulder Injuries

Background: Imaging continues to have a crucial role in evaluating patients with shoulder pain, helping to make treatment choices. Magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA), rather than magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is now routinely used to diagnose shoulder injuries. Against the gold standard inves...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Prateek Awasthi, Abhishek Dwivedi, Satveer S. Choudhary
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2025-06-01
Series:Advanced Biomedical Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/abr.abr_347_23
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849236363104223232
author Prateek Awasthi
Abhishek Dwivedi
Satveer S. Choudhary
author_facet Prateek Awasthi
Abhishek Dwivedi
Satveer S. Choudhary
author_sort Prateek Awasthi
collection DOAJ
description Background: Imaging continues to have a crucial role in evaluating patients with shoulder pain, helping to make treatment choices. Magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA), rather than magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is now routinely used to diagnose shoulder injuries. Against the gold standard investigation of arthroscopy, the study aimed to determine the accuracy of MRA in the evaluation of shoulder injuries. Materials and Methods: From June 2017 to May 2019, a cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care health setup in North India. A total of 50 individuals were enrolled for diagnostic imaging with rotator cuff (RC) pathology. Patients were assessed using an MRA and their clinical history. In comparison with the gold standard for arthroscopy, the sensitivity (Sn), positive predictive value (PPV), and diagnostic accuracy (DA) of MRA for diagnosing shoulder injuries were evaluated. A P value under 0.05 was taken to be statistically significant. Results: The mean ± standard deviation (SD) age of the patients was 37.32 ± 12.78 years. There were seven women and 43 (86%) men. The different lesions were superior labral anterior–posterior (SLAP) tear (24 (48%)), Bankart lesions (19 (38%)), anterior labral periosteal sleeve avulsion (ALSPA) (4 (8%)), partial articular supraspinatus tendon avulsion (PASTA) lesion (2 (4%)), and Buford lesions (1 (2%)). The Sn, PPV, and DA of MRA were 98%, 100%, and 98%, respectively, for identifying the shoulder injury. Conclusion: It was concluded that MRA was reasonably accurate at diagnosing shoulder injuries. MRA demonstrated an excellent 98% Sn in identifying shoulder injuries and missed only one case of shoulder injury, suggesting that it can be an advantageous imaging tool for recognizing and evaluating shoulder injuries for immediate diagnosis and management.
format Article
id doaj-art-dbc56c6104d442b4ac099be85bd51515
institution Kabale University
issn 2277-9175
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Advanced Biomedical Research
spelling doaj-art-dbc56c6104d442b4ac099be85bd515152025-08-20T04:02:17ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsAdvanced Biomedical Research2277-91752025-06-01141555510.4103/abr.abr_347_23Role of Magnetic Resonance Arthrography (MRA) in the Diagnosis of Shoulder InjuriesPrateek AwasthiAbhishek DwivediSatveer S. ChoudharyBackground: Imaging continues to have a crucial role in evaluating patients with shoulder pain, helping to make treatment choices. Magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA), rather than magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is now routinely used to diagnose shoulder injuries. Against the gold standard investigation of arthroscopy, the study aimed to determine the accuracy of MRA in the evaluation of shoulder injuries. Materials and Methods: From June 2017 to May 2019, a cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care health setup in North India. A total of 50 individuals were enrolled for diagnostic imaging with rotator cuff (RC) pathology. Patients were assessed using an MRA and their clinical history. In comparison with the gold standard for arthroscopy, the sensitivity (Sn), positive predictive value (PPV), and diagnostic accuracy (DA) of MRA for diagnosing shoulder injuries were evaluated. A P value under 0.05 was taken to be statistically significant. Results: The mean ± standard deviation (SD) age of the patients was 37.32 ± 12.78 years. There were seven women and 43 (86%) men. The different lesions were superior labral anterior–posterior (SLAP) tear (24 (48%)), Bankart lesions (19 (38%)), anterior labral periosteal sleeve avulsion (ALSPA) (4 (8%)), partial articular supraspinatus tendon avulsion (PASTA) lesion (2 (4%)), and Buford lesions (1 (2%)). The Sn, PPV, and DA of MRA were 98%, 100%, and 98%, respectively, for identifying the shoulder injury. Conclusion: It was concluded that MRA was reasonably accurate at diagnosing shoulder injuries. MRA demonstrated an excellent 98% Sn in identifying shoulder injuries and missed only one case of shoulder injury, suggesting that it can be an advantageous imaging tool for recognizing and evaluating shoulder injuries for immediate diagnosis and management.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/abr.abr_347_23diagnosismagnetic resonance imagingradiologysensitivity and specificityshoulder
spellingShingle Prateek Awasthi
Abhishek Dwivedi
Satveer S. Choudhary
Role of Magnetic Resonance Arthrography (MRA) in the Diagnosis of Shoulder Injuries
Advanced Biomedical Research
diagnosis
magnetic resonance imaging
radiology
sensitivity and specificity
shoulder
title Role of Magnetic Resonance Arthrography (MRA) in the Diagnosis of Shoulder Injuries
title_full Role of Magnetic Resonance Arthrography (MRA) in the Diagnosis of Shoulder Injuries
title_fullStr Role of Magnetic Resonance Arthrography (MRA) in the Diagnosis of Shoulder Injuries
title_full_unstemmed Role of Magnetic Resonance Arthrography (MRA) in the Diagnosis of Shoulder Injuries
title_short Role of Magnetic Resonance Arthrography (MRA) in the Diagnosis of Shoulder Injuries
title_sort role of magnetic resonance arthrography mra in the diagnosis of shoulder injuries
topic diagnosis
magnetic resonance imaging
radiology
sensitivity and specificity
shoulder
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/abr.abr_347_23
work_keys_str_mv AT prateekawasthi roleofmagneticresonancearthrographymrainthediagnosisofshoulderinjuries
AT abhishekdwivedi roleofmagneticresonancearthrographymrainthediagnosisofshoulderinjuries
AT satveerschoudhary roleofmagneticresonancearthrographymrainthediagnosisofshoulderinjuries