On two ways to expand on the harm principle

In this article I survey the historical antecedents of what has been commonly referred to as John Stuart Mill´s Harm Principle and some of the ways in which the principle has been discussed in the work of recent analytic philosophers. Subsequently, in the article`s substantive core, I focus entirel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rodrigo Jungmann de Castro
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Universidade Federal do Ceará 2024-12-01
Series:Argumentos
Subjects:
Online Access:http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/94440
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841563177702129664
author Rodrigo Jungmann de Castro
author_facet Rodrigo Jungmann de Castro
author_sort Rodrigo Jungmann de Castro
collection DOAJ
description In this article I survey the historical antecedents of what has been commonly referred to as John Stuart Mill´s Harm Principle and some of the ways in which the principle has been discussed in the work of recent analytic philosophers. Subsequently, in the article`s substantive core, I focus entirely on what Mill refers to as the “moral coercion of public opinion”. Here I address matters which I take to underexplored in the literature, namely some difficulties that arise for Mill´s treatment in connection with our ordinary notions concerning politeness and social avoidance. Though the problem of avoidance has been addressed by Dan Threet and John Dilulio, among others, I believe that my approach to the problems created by Mill`s take on politeness is entirely original with me. Considering the foregoing, I propose adding two supplementary clauses to the Harm Principle. I conclude by presenting a modern statement of said principle.
format Article
id doaj-art-db0d40a953874a2e9f370336191214dc
institution Kabale University
issn 1984-4247
1984-4255
language Portuguese
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Universidade Federal do Ceará
record_format Article
series Argumentos
spelling doaj-art-db0d40a953874a2e9f370336191214dc2025-01-03T00:10:38ZporUniversidade Federal do CearáArgumentos1984-42471984-42552024-12-0116esp.On two ways to expand on the harm principleRodrigo Jungmann de Castro0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0619-9693Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE) In this article I survey the historical antecedents of what has been commonly referred to as John Stuart Mill´s Harm Principle and some of the ways in which the principle has been discussed in the work of recent analytic philosophers. Subsequently, in the article`s substantive core, I focus entirely on what Mill refers to as the “moral coercion of public opinion”. Here I address matters which I take to underexplored in the literature, namely some difficulties that arise for Mill´s treatment in connection with our ordinary notions concerning politeness and social avoidance. Though the problem of avoidance has been addressed by Dan Threet and John Dilulio, among others, I believe that my approach to the problems created by Mill`s take on politeness is entirely original with me. Considering the foregoing, I propose adding two supplementary clauses to the Harm Principle. I conclude by presenting a modern statement of said principle. http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/94440John Stuart Mill. Harm Principle. Public opinion. Liberalism.
spellingShingle Rodrigo Jungmann de Castro
On two ways to expand on the harm principle
Argumentos
John Stuart Mill. Harm Principle. Public opinion. Liberalism.
title On two ways to expand on the harm principle
title_full On two ways to expand on the harm principle
title_fullStr On two ways to expand on the harm principle
title_full_unstemmed On two ways to expand on the harm principle
title_short On two ways to expand on the harm principle
title_sort on two ways to expand on the harm principle
topic John Stuart Mill. Harm Principle. Public opinion. Liberalism.
url http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/94440
work_keys_str_mv AT rodrigojungmanndecastro ontwowaystoexpandontheharmprinciple