REPRESENTATION OF THE STRATEGY OF INTERCEPTION BY PITCH VARIATIONS IN POLITICAL DEBATES
The political future of debating candidates is often shaped by the degree of credibility based on argumentative strategies. Today, political argumentation has gained particular relevance, especially due to its psychological impact on voters. In political debates, opponents who possess different po...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Alfred Nobel University
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Alfred Nobel University Journal of Philology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://phil.duan.edu.ua/images/PDF/2024/2/18-.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The political future of debating candidates is often shaped by the degree of credibility based on
argumentative strategies. Today, political argumentation has gained particular relevance, especially
due to its psychological impact on voters. In political debates, opponents who possess different political
backgrounds employ diverse linguistic and prosodic styles.
Through linguistic analysis of selected audio and video materials, we identified several linguistic
methods that achieve the objectives of divertissement, competitiveness and personification in political
debates, which are the main characteristics of this type of political discourse. The differences between
ordinary utterances, remark-utterances, simple overlays of remarks, role exchanges and intentional
interruptions are also considered as manipulative means, as we argue that these are deliberate and
determined by the speakers’ communicative strategies.
We focus particularly on the dialogic nature of televised debates, which in this type of political
discourse operates on two-levels: “politician – opponent”, and “politician – audience”.
Participants in televised debates use various argumentative strategies to influence both their
opponents and voters, often deliberately aiming to discredit their opponents and create a contrasting
background for manipulation. For this analysis, we focused on the interception strategy, one of the most
commonly used in political debates.
In the paper, we examine the speech behavior of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton as a tool to create
their media portrait and personify their political programs.
Thus, the article focuses on the strategy of interception and its prosodic realization by means of
such non-verbal tools as pitch variations accompanied by deliberate interruptions, remarks, refutations
and increasing volume of voice which contribute to argumentation in political debates. In other words, the
paper aims at benefiting to identify the role of prosodic means in argumentative political debates.
The research methodology involves the code biology approach by applying experimental phonetic
and phonological methods.
Our analysis reveals that prosody is crucial not only in shaping political discourse but also in reflecting
politicians’ viewpoints. We tried to match prosody with argumentation, which contributes to synthesizing
naturalness in political speeches.
Interruptions disrupt the prosodic structure of the statement and conflict with phonetic signals of
role switching, such as high/low pitch or terminal tone variations. Opponents convey confidence through
pitch variations: the low pitch is an indicator of assertiveness and certainty, whereas the high pitch suggests
uncertainty. High pitch occurs when the new information (rheme) is introduced, while low pitch reflects
previously stated information (theme). High pitch can also be a strategy to express emotions or a tool to
make the opponent give up and concede the role. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 3041-217X 3041-2188 |