Forearm elevation impairs local static handgrip endurance likely through reduction in vascular conductance and perfusion pressure: revisiting Rohmert’s curve

Abstract Maximal isometric contraction time (MICT) is critical for most motor tasks and depends on skeletal muscle blood flow at < 40% of maximal voluntary strength (MVC). Whether limb work positions associated with reduced perfusion pressure and facilitated vessel compression affect MICT is larg...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: L. Heinzl, S. Risse, H. Schwarzbach, O. Hildebrandt, U. Koehler, A. M. Koenig, A. H. Mahnken, R. Kinscherf, W. Hildebrandt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-01-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83939-7
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841544782810185728
author L. Heinzl
S. Risse
H. Schwarzbach
O. Hildebrandt
U. Koehler
A. M. Koenig
A. H. Mahnken
R. Kinscherf
W. Hildebrandt
author_facet L. Heinzl
S. Risse
H. Schwarzbach
O. Hildebrandt
U. Koehler
A. M. Koenig
A. H. Mahnken
R. Kinscherf
W. Hildebrandt
author_sort L. Heinzl
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Maximal isometric contraction time (MICT) is critical for most motor tasks and depends on skeletal muscle blood flow at < 40% of maximal voluntary strength (MVC). Whether limb work positions associated with reduced perfusion pressure and facilitated vessel compression affect MICT is largely unknown. In 14 healthy young men we therefore assessed bilateral handgrip MICT at 15, 20, 30, 40, and 70% of MVC in horizontal forearm positions of 0.0, + 27.5 or − 27.5 cm relative to heart level. Forearm blood flow (FBF, venous occlusion plethysmography) and brachial blood pressure were measured repetitively. MICT at 15% MVC was significantly shorter by 66.3 and 86.2 s with forearm position + 27.5 cm (389.6 ± 23.3 s) as compared to 0.0 cm (455.9 ± 34.1 s) and − 27.5 cm (475.8 ± 35.0 s) while MICT at 20–70% MVC was unaffected. Peak FBF at 15% MVC was significantly lower in position + 27.5 cm (11.11 ± 0.92 ml/min/100 ml) compared to 0.0 cm (15.55 ± 0.91 ml/min/100 ml) or − 27.5 cm (14.21 ± 0.59 ml/min/100 ml) and vascular resistance significantly higher in position + 27.5 vs 0.0 or − 27.5 cm. Working position above, but not below heart level may limit MICT at 15% MVC possibly through blood flow reduction arising from increased vascular resistance beside reduced perfusion pressure. Local isometric endurance warrants (re)evaluation regarding hydrostatic/gravitational or other hemodynamic limitations.
format Article
id doaj-art-d9e0767b9d8844e89d8731260ff134c0
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-d9e0767b9d8844e89d8731260ff134c02025-01-12T12:17:14ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-01-0115111510.1038/s41598-024-83939-7Forearm elevation impairs local static handgrip endurance likely through reduction in vascular conductance and perfusion pressure: revisiting Rohmert’s curveL. Heinzl0S. Risse1H. Schwarzbach2O. Hildebrandt3U. Koehler4A. M. Koenig5A. H. Mahnken6R. Kinscherf7W. Hildebrandt8Institute for Anatomy und Cell Biology, Department of Medical Cell Biology, Philipps-Universität MarburgInstitute for Anatomy und Cell Biology, Department of Medical Cell Biology, Philipps-Universität MarburgInstitute for Anatomy und Cell Biology, Department of Medical Cell Biology, Philipps-Universität MarburgDepartment of Sleep Medicine, Division of Pneumology, Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Marburg, Philipps-Universität MarburgDepartment of Sleep Medicine, Division of Pneumology, Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Marburg, Philipps-Universität MarburgDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Marburg, Philipps-UniversityDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Marburg, Philipps-UniversityInstitute for Anatomy und Cell Biology, Department of Medical Cell Biology, Philipps-Universität MarburgInstitute for Anatomy und Cell Biology, Department of Medical Cell Biology, Philipps-Universität MarburgAbstract Maximal isometric contraction time (MICT) is critical for most motor tasks and depends on skeletal muscle blood flow at < 40% of maximal voluntary strength (MVC). Whether limb work positions associated with reduced perfusion pressure and facilitated vessel compression affect MICT is largely unknown. In 14 healthy young men we therefore assessed bilateral handgrip MICT at 15, 20, 30, 40, and 70% of MVC in horizontal forearm positions of 0.0, + 27.5 or − 27.5 cm relative to heart level. Forearm blood flow (FBF, venous occlusion plethysmography) and brachial blood pressure were measured repetitively. MICT at 15% MVC was significantly shorter by 66.3 and 86.2 s with forearm position + 27.5 cm (389.6 ± 23.3 s) as compared to 0.0 cm (455.9 ± 34.1 s) and − 27.5 cm (475.8 ± 35.0 s) while MICT at 20–70% MVC was unaffected. Peak FBF at 15% MVC was significantly lower in position + 27.5 cm (11.11 ± 0.92 ml/min/100 ml) compared to 0.0 cm (15.55 ± 0.91 ml/min/100 ml) or − 27.5 cm (14.21 ± 0.59 ml/min/100 ml) and vascular resistance significantly higher in position + 27.5 vs 0.0 or − 27.5 cm. Working position above, but not below heart level may limit MICT at 15% MVC possibly through blood flow reduction arising from increased vascular resistance beside reduced perfusion pressure. Local isometric endurance warrants (re)evaluation regarding hydrostatic/gravitational or other hemodynamic limitations.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83939-7Skeletal muscleStatic exerciseFatigueBlood flowGravitationHydrostatic pressure
spellingShingle L. Heinzl
S. Risse
H. Schwarzbach
O. Hildebrandt
U. Koehler
A. M. Koenig
A. H. Mahnken
R. Kinscherf
W. Hildebrandt
Forearm elevation impairs local static handgrip endurance likely through reduction in vascular conductance and perfusion pressure: revisiting Rohmert’s curve
Scientific Reports
Skeletal muscle
Static exercise
Fatigue
Blood flow
Gravitation
Hydrostatic pressure
title Forearm elevation impairs local static handgrip endurance likely through reduction in vascular conductance and perfusion pressure: revisiting Rohmert’s curve
title_full Forearm elevation impairs local static handgrip endurance likely through reduction in vascular conductance and perfusion pressure: revisiting Rohmert’s curve
title_fullStr Forearm elevation impairs local static handgrip endurance likely through reduction in vascular conductance and perfusion pressure: revisiting Rohmert’s curve
title_full_unstemmed Forearm elevation impairs local static handgrip endurance likely through reduction in vascular conductance and perfusion pressure: revisiting Rohmert’s curve
title_short Forearm elevation impairs local static handgrip endurance likely through reduction in vascular conductance and perfusion pressure: revisiting Rohmert’s curve
title_sort forearm elevation impairs local static handgrip endurance likely through reduction in vascular conductance and perfusion pressure revisiting rohmert s curve
topic Skeletal muscle
Static exercise
Fatigue
Blood flow
Gravitation
Hydrostatic pressure
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83939-7
work_keys_str_mv AT lheinzl forearmelevationimpairslocalstatichandgripendurancelikelythroughreductioninvascularconductanceandperfusionpressurerevisitingrohmertscurve
AT srisse forearmelevationimpairslocalstatichandgripendurancelikelythroughreductioninvascularconductanceandperfusionpressurerevisitingrohmertscurve
AT hschwarzbach forearmelevationimpairslocalstatichandgripendurancelikelythroughreductioninvascularconductanceandperfusionpressurerevisitingrohmertscurve
AT ohildebrandt forearmelevationimpairslocalstatichandgripendurancelikelythroughreductioninvascularconductanceandperfusionpressurerevisitingrohmertscurve
AT ukoehler forearmelevationimpairslocalstatichandgripendurancelikelythroughreductioninvascularconductanceandperfusionpressurerevisitingrohmertscurve
AT amkoenig forearmelevationimpairslocalstatichandgripendurancelikelythroughreductioninvascularconductanceandperfusionpressurerevisitingrohmertscurve
AT ahmahnken forearmelevationimpairslocalstatichandgripendurancelikelythroughreductioninvascularconductanceandperfusionpressurerevisitingrohmertscurve
AT rkinscherf forearmelevationimpairslocalstatichandgripendurancelikelythroughreductioninvascularconductanceandperfusionpressurerevisitingrohmertscurve
AT whildebrandt forearmelevationimpairslocalstatichandgripendurancelikelythroughreductioninvascularconductanceandperfusionpressurerevisitingrohmertscurve