Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability, Bond Strength, and Antimicrobial Properties of Endodontic Sealers: An In Vitro Study

Objective: To compare the sealing ability, bond strength, and antimicrobial properties of BioRoot root canal sealer (RCS), TotalFill Bioceramic (BC), EndoSeal Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA), and AH Plus in endodontic therapy. Methods: Eighty single-rooted human teeth were divided into four groups...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: V Vijith, Anarasi Mahaprasad, A Purusothaman, Aravind Kumar Duraivel, Mariea Francis, Hitesh Chohan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2024-12-01
Series:Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1110_24
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective: To compare the sealing ability, bond strength, and antimicrobial properties of BioRoot root canal sealer (RCS), TotalFill Bioceramic (BC), EndoSeal Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA), and AH Plus in endodontic therapy. Methods: Eighty single-rooted human teeth were divided into four groups (n = 20). Sealing ability was assessed via dye penetration, bond strength with push-out tests, and antimicrobial properties using agar diffusion tests against Enterococcus faecalis. Statistical analysis involved one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) tests (P < 0.05). Results: BioRoot RCS showed the best sealing ability, highest bond strength, and largest antimicrobial zone. AH Plus had the poorest performance. Conclusion: BioRoot RCS is a superior endodontic sealer.
ISSN:0976-4879
0975-7406