Risk factors for photic phenomena in two different multifocal diffractive intraocular lenses
Abstract Photic phenomena are more pronounced in presbyopia-corrected than in monofocal intraocular lens (IOL), causing dissatisfaction after cataract surgery. Photic Phenomena Test (PPT) quantifies photic phenomena in eyes with two types of presbyopia-corrected IOL. We examined the relationship bet...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2025-01-01
|
Series: | Scientific Reports |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83838-x |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1841559695952707584 |
---|---|
author | Yuki Ukai Tsuyoshi Mito Yui Nakatsugawa Yusuke Seki Norihiro Mita Eri Shibuya Mai Yamazaki Eri Kubo Hiroshi Sasaki |
author_facet | Yuki Ukai Tsuyoshi Mito Yui Nakatsugawa Yusuke Seki Norihiro Mita Eri Shibuya Mai Yamazaki Eri Kubo Hiroshi Sasaki |
author_sort | Yuki Ukai |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Photic phenomena are more pronounced in presbyopia-corrected than in monofocal intraocular lens (IOL), causing dissatisfaction after cataract surgery. Photic Phenomena Test (PPT) quantifies photic phenomena in eyes with two types of presbyopia-corrected IOL. We examined the relationship between preoperative eye shape and pupil diameter. We included patients with PanOptix IOLs (PanOptix group, n = 38; 65.7 ± 9.2 years old) and Synergy IOLs (Synergy group, n = 39; 61.9 ± 9.6 years old), who underwent the PPT between 1 and 3 months after cataract surgery, from January 2021 to April 2023. The relationships between age, sex, pupil diameter, and higher-order corneal aberrations were examined and mean values for PPT measurements were compared between the groups. There was no difference in glare between the two groups. The halo was larger and thicker, and the starburst was larger and stronger in the Synergy group (P < 0.01). Postoperative halo brightness was positively correlated with the corneal coma aberration in the PanOptix group (P < 0.05). The Synergy group showed a positive correlation between the size and brightness of the postoperative halo and starburst and pupil diameter (P < 0.01). PPT, thus, revealed risk factors in eyes with two types of presbyopia-corrected IOL, which can be examined before cataract surgery to provide critical information for IOL selection. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-d9acab9900a645d7b80e3ac207fe9491 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2045-2322 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
publisher | Nature Portfolio |
record_format | Article |
series | Scientific Reports |
spelling | doaj-art-d9acab9900a645d7b80e3ac207fe94912025-01-05T12:19:45ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-01-0115111010.1038/s41598-024-83838-xRisk factors for photic phenomena in two different multifocal diffractive intraocular lensesYuki Ukai0Tsuyoshi Mito1Yui Nakatsugawa2Yusuke Seki3Norihiro Mita4Eri Shibuya5Mai Yamazaki6Eri Kubo7Hiroshi Sasaki8Department of Ophthalmology, Kanazawa Medical UniversityDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kanazawa Medical UniversityDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kanazawa Medical UniversityDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kanazawa Medical UniversityDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kanazawa Medical UniversityDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kanazawa Medical UniversityDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kanazawa Medical UniversityDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kanazawa Medical UniversityDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kanazawa Medical UniversityAbstract Photic phenomena are more pronounced in presbyopia-corrected than in monofocal intraocular lens (IOL), causing dissatisfaction after cataract surgery. Photic Phenomena Test (PPT) quantifies photic phenomena in eyes with two types of presbyopia-corrected IOL. We examined the relationship between preoperative eye shape and pupil diameter. We included patients with PanOptix IOLs (PanOptix group, n = 38; 65.7 ± 9.2 years old) and Synergy IOLs (Synergy group, n = 39; 61.9 ± 9.6 years old), who underwent the PPT between 1 and 3 months after cataract surgery, from January 2021 to April 2023. The relationships between age, sex, pupil diameter, and higher-order corneal aberrations were examined and mean values for PPT measurements were compared between the groups. There was no difference in glare between the two groups. The halo was larger and thicker, and the starburst was larger and stronger in the Synergy group (P < 0.01). Postoperative halo brightness was positively correlated with the corneal coma aberration in the PanOptix group (P < 0.05). The Synergy group showed a positive correlation between the size and brightness of the postoperative halo and starburst and pupil diameter (P < 0.01). PPT, thus, revealed risk factors in eyes with two types of presbyopia-corrected IOL, which can be examined before cataract surgery to provide critical information for IOL selection.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83838-xIntraocular lensPhotic phenomenaCataract surgeryEye shapePupil size |
spellingShingle | Yuki Ukai Tsuyoshi Mito Yui Nakatsugawa Yusuke Seki Norihiro Mita Eri Shibuya Mai Yamazaki Eri Kubo Hiroshi Sasaki Risk factors for photic phenomena in two different multifocal diffractive intraocular lenses Scientific Reports Intraocular lens Photic phenomena Cataract surgery Eye shape Pupil size |
title | Risk factors for photic phenomena in two different multifocal diffractive intraocular lenses |
title_full | Risk factors for photic phenomena in two different multifocal diffractive intraocular lenses |
title_fullStr | Risk factors for photic phenomena in two different multifocal diffractive intraocular lenses |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk factors for photic phenomena in two different multifocal diffractive intraocular lenses |
title_short | Risk factors for photic phenomena in two different multifocal diffractive intraocular lenses |
title_sort | risk factors for photic phenomena in two different multifocal diffractive intraocular lenses |
topic | Intraocular lens Photic phenomena Cataract surgery Eye shape Pupil size |
url | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83838-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yukiukai riskfactorsforphoticphenomenaintwodifferentmultifocaldiffractiveintraocularlenses AT tsuyoshimito riskfactorsforphoticphenomenaintwodifferentmultifocaldiffractiveintraocularlenses AT yuinakatsugawa riskfactorsforphoticphenomenaintwodifferentmultifocaldiffractiveintraocularlenses AT yusukeseki riskfactorsforphoticphenomenaintwodifferentmultifocaldiffractiveintraocularlenses AT norihiromita riskfactorsforphoticphenomenaintwodifferentmultifocaldiffractiveintraocularlenses AT erishibuya riskfactorsforphoticphenomenaintwodifferentmultifocaldiffractiveintraocularlenses AT maiyamazaki riskfactorsforphoticphenomenaintwodifferentmultifocaldiffractiveintraocularlenses AT erikubo riskfactorsforphoticphenomenaintwodifferentmultifocaldiffractiveintraocularlenses AT hiroshisasaki riskfactorsforphoticphenomenaintwodifferentmultifocaldiffractiveintraocularlenses |