Considerations for Evaluating Evolving Organizations and Initiatives

Background: Evaluators are often called to be flexible in response to changing programmatic and contextual circumstances. However, the field offers little guidance around issues to consider before modifying an in-progress evaluation. Purpose: This article describes the evaluation of an organizat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lori Palen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Evaluation Center at Western Michigan University 2017-09-01
Series:Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.sfu.ca/jmde/index.php/jmde_1/article/view/475
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841561363515703296
author Lori Palen
author_facet Lori Palen
author_sort Lori Palen
collection DOAJ
description Background: Evaluators are often called to be flexible in response to changing programmatic and contextual circumstances. However, the field offers little guidance around issues to consider before modifying an in-progress evaluation. Purpose: This article describes the evaluation of an organization that underwent significant mid-evaluation changes, with a focus on factors that went into the evaluator’s recommendations about whether to modify evaluation design and instrumentation. Setting: Community collaborative in Wake County, North Carolina Intervention: NA Research Design: NA Data Collection and Analysis: The evaluator noted factors that went in to decisions about modifying evaluation design and instrumentation. Findings: Issues around validity and sustainability push evaluators to update our evaluation designs to keep pace with changes, whereas issues around continuity and accountability pull us to back to the current course.
format Article
id doaj-art-d95fa80ba8d34280a23bbe5ff5d57ba3
institution Kabale University
issn 1556-8180
language English
publishDate 2017-09-01
publisher The Evaluation Center at Western Michigan University
record_format Article
series Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation
spelling doaj-art-d95fa80ba8d34280a23bbe5ff5d57ba32025-01-03T01:46:08ZengThe Evaluation Center at Western Michigan UniversityJournal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation1556-81802017-09-01132910.56645/jmde.v13i29.475Considerations for Evaluating Evolving Organizations and InitiativesLori Palenhttps://orcid.org/0009-0004-6577-1065 Background: Evaluators are often called to be flexible in response to changing programmatic and contextual circumstances. However, the field offers little guidance around issues to consider before modifying an in-progress evaluation. Purpose: This article describes the evaluation of an organization that underwent significant mid-evaluation changes, with a focus on factors that went into the evaluator’s recommendations about whether to modify evaluation design and instrumentation. Setting: Community collaborative in Wake County, North Carolina Intervention: NA Research Design: NA Data Collection and Analysis: The evaluator noted factors that went in to decisions about modifying evaluation design and instrumentation. Findings: Issues around validity and sustainability push evaluators to update our evaluation designs to keep pace with changes, whereas issues around continuity and accountability pull us to back to the current course. https://journals.sfu.ca/jmde/index.php/jmde_1/article/view/475evaluation designdata collectionmodificationflexibility
spellingShingle Lori Palen
Considerations for Evaluating Evolving Organizations and Initiatives
Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation
evaluation design
data collection
modification
flexibility
title Considerations for Evaluating Evolving Organizations and Initiatives
title_full Considerations for Evaluating Evolving Organizations and Initiatives
title_fullStr Considerations for Evaluating Evolving Organizations and Initiatives
title_full_unstemmed Considerations for Evaluating Evolving Organizations and Initiatives
title_short Considerations for Evaluating Evolving Organizations and Initiatives
title_sort considerations for evaluating evolving organizations and initiatives
topic evaluation design
data collection
modification
flexibility
url https://journals.sfu.ca/jmde/index.php/jmde_1/article/view/475
work_keys_str_mv AT loripalen considerationsforevaluatingevolvingorganizationsandinitiatives