Comparison of a voclosporin-based triple immunosuppressive therapy to high-dose glucocorticoid-based immunosuppressive therapy: a propensity analysis of the AURA-LV and AURORA 1 studies and ALMS

Introduction High-dose glucocorticoid (GC)-based dual immunosuppressive treatment regimens are still frequently used in active lupus nephritis (LN) despite their known association with dose-dependent toxicities and incomplete efficacy. We hypothesised that the addition of voclosporin to low-dose GCs...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kenneth Kalunian, Neil Solomons, Maria Dall'Era, Anca D Askanase, Matt Truman, Ernie Yap, Lucy S Hodge
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2024-11-01
Series:Lupus Science and Medicine
Online Access:https://lupus.bmj.com/content/11/2/e001319.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846169575506313216
author Kenneth Kalunian
Neil Solomons
Maria Dall'Era
Anca D Askanase
Matt Truman
Ernie Yap
Lucy S Hodge
author_facet Kenneth Kalunian
Neil Solomons
Maria Dall'Era
Anca D Askanase
Matt Truman
Ernie Yap
Lucy S Hodge
author_sort Kenneth Kalunian
collection DOAJ
description Introduction High-dose glucocorticoid (GC)-based dual immunosuppressive treatment regimens are still frequently used in active lupus nephritis (LN) despite their known association with dose-dependent toxicities and incomplete efficacy. We hypothesised that the addition of voclosporin to low-dose GCs and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) would reduce exposure to the toxicities of high-dose GC-based dual immunosuppressive therapy regimens, resulting in an improved safety profile without compromising efficacy.Methods Propensity score matching generated two groups of matched participants from the voclosporin arms (in combination with MMF (2 g/day) and low-dose GCs) of the Phase 2 AURA-LV and Phase 3 AURORA 1 studies and the MMF (3 g/day) and intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVC) arms (both in combination with high-dose GCs) of the Aspreva Lupus Management Study (ALMS) induction study. Safety and efficacy outcomes were assessed over 6 months.Results There were 179 matched participants identified between the AURA-LV/AURORA 1 studies and ALMS. The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was higher in IVC- and MMF-treated participants of ALMS; more voclosporin-treated participants reported AEs by preferred term of glomerular filtration rate decreased, hypertension and anaemia. The incidence of serious AEs was similar across treatments. There were four (2.2%) deaths in IVC- and MMF-treated participants of ALMS compared with seven (3.9%) deaths in voclosporin-treated participants. Significantly more voclosporin-treated participants achieved a ≥25% reduction in urine protein creatinine ratio (UPCR) from baseline at 3 months and ≥50% reduction in UPCR from baseline at 6 months.Conclusions Compared with the high-dose GC-based regimens used in ALMS, voclosporin-based triple immunosuppressive therapy resulted in fewer AEs overall and greater and earlier reductions in proteinuria over the first 6 months of treatment. These data reinforce the feasibility of using low doses of GCs and MMF to treat LN when combined with voclosporin as a third agent.
format Article
id doaj-art-d816f2ebf6dd4088bbd3aa4840138f13
institution Kabale University
issn 2053-8790
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series Lupus Science and Medicine
spelling doaj-art-d816f2ebf6dd4088bbd3aa4840138f132024-11-12T20:45:08ZengBMJ Publishing GroupLupus Science and Medicine2053-87902024-11-0111210.1136/lupus-2024-001319Comparison of a voclosporin-based triple immunosuppressive therapy to high-dose glucocorticoid-based immunosuppressive therapy: a propensity analysis of the AURA-LV and AURORA 1 studies and ALMSKenneth Kalunian0Neil Solomons1Maria Dall'Era2Anca D Askanase3Matt Truman4Ernie Yap5Lucy S Hodge63University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States of AmericaAurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc, Victoria, British Columbia, CanadaUniversity of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USADepartment of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USAAurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada2Dept. of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USAAurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaIntroduction High-dose glucocorticoid (GC)-based dual immunosuppressive treatment regimens are still frequently used in active lupus nephritis (LN) despite their known association with dose-dependent toxicities and incomplete efficacy. We hypothesised that the addition of voclosporin to low-dose GCs and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) would reduce exposure to the toxicities of high-dose GC-based dual immunosuppressive therapy regimens, resulting in an improved safety profile without compromising efficacy.Methods Propensity score matching generated two groups of matched participants from the voclosporin arms (in combination with MMF (2 g/day) and low-dose GCs) of the Phase 2 AURA-LV and Phase 3 AURORA 1 studies and the MMF (3 g/day) and intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVC) arms (both in combination with high-dose GCs) of the Aspreva Lupus Management Study (ALMS) induction study. Safety and efficacy outcomes were assessed over 6 months.Results There were 179 matched participants identified between the AURA-LV/AURORA 1 studies and ALMS. The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was higher in IVC- and MMF-treated participants of ALMS; more voclosporin-treated participants reported AEs by preferred term of glomerular filtration rate decreased, hypertension and anaemia. The incidence of serious AEs was similar across treatments. There were four (2.2%) deaths in IVC- and MMF-treated participants of ALMS compared with seven (3.9%) deaths in voclosporin-treated participants. Significantly more voclosporin-treated participants achieved a ≥25% reduction in urine protein creatinine ratio (UPCR) from baseline at 3 months and ≥50% reduction in UPCR from baseline at 6 months.Conclusions Compared with the high-dose GC-based regimens used in ALMS, voclosporin-based triple immunosuppressive therapy resulted in fewer AEs overall and greater and earlier reductions in proteinuria over the first 6 months of treatment. These data reinforce the feasibility of using low doses of GCs and MMF to treat LN when combined with voclosporin as a third agent.https://lupus.bmj.com/content/11/2/e001319.full
spellingShingle Kenneth Kalunian
Neil Solomons
Maria Dall'Era
Anca D Askanase
Matt Truman
Ernie Yap
Lucy S Hodge
Comparison of a voclosporin-based triple immunosuppressive therapy to high-dose glucocorticoid-based immunosuppressive therapy: a propensity analysis of the AURA-LV and AURORA 1 studies and ALMS
Lupus Science and Medicine
title Comparison of a voclosporin-based triple immunosuppressive therapy to high-dose glucocorticoid-based immunosuppressive therapy: a propensity analysis of the AURA-LV and AURORA 1 studies and ALMS
title_full Comparison of a voclosporin-based triple immunosuppressive therapy to high-dose glucocorticoid-based immunosuppressive therapy: a propensity analysis of the AURA-LV and AURORA 1 studies and ALMS
title_fullStr Comparison of a voclosporin-based triple immunosuppressive therapy to high-dose glucocorticoid-based immunosuppressive therapy: a propensity analysis of the AURA-LV and AURORA 1 studies and ALMS
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of a voclosporin-based triple immunosuppressive therapy to high-dose glucocorticoid-based immunosuppressive therapy: a propensity analysis of the AURA-LV and AURORA 1 studies and ALMS
title_short Comparison of a voclosporin-based triple immunosuppressive therapy to high-dose glucocorticoid-based immunosuppressive therapy: a propensity analysis of the AURA-LV and AURORA 1 studies and ALMS
title_sort comparison of a voclosporin based triple immunosuppressive therapy to high dose glucocorticoid based immunosuppressive therapy a propensity analysis of the aura lv and aurora 1 studies and alms
url https://lupus.bmj.com/content/11/2/e001319.full
work_keys_str_mv AT kennethkalunian comparisonofavoclosporinbasedtripleimmunosuppressivetherapytohighdoseglucocorticoidbasedimmunosuppressivetherapyapropensityanalysisoftheauralvandaurora1studiesandalms
AT neilsolomons comparisonofavoclosporinbasedtripleimmunosuppressivetherapytohighdoseglucocorticoidbasedimmunosuppressivetherapyapropensityanalysisoftheauralvandaurora1studiesandalms
AT mariadallera comparisonofavoclosporinbasedtripleimmunosuppressivetherapytohighdoseglucocorticoidbasedimmunosuppressivetherapyapropensityanalysisoftheauralvandaurora1studiesandalms
AT ancadaskanase comparisonofavoclosporinbasedtripleimmunosuppressivetherapytohighdoseglucocorticoidbasedimmunosuppressivetherapyapropensityanalysisoftheauralvandaurora1studiesandalms
AT matttruman comparisonofavoclosporinbasedtripleimmunosuppressivetherapytohighdoseglucocorticoidbasedimmunosuppressivetherapyapropensityanalysisoftheauralvandaurora1studiesandalms
AT ernieyap comparisonofavoclosporinbasedtripleimmunosuppressivetherapytohighdoseglucocorticoidbasedimmunosuppressivetherapyapropensityanalysisoftheauralvandaurora1studiesandalms
AT lucyshodge comparisonofavoclosporinbasedtripleimmunosuppressivetherapytohighdoseglucocorticoidbasedimmunosuppressivetherapyapropensityanalysisoftheauralvandaurora1studiesandalms