Long-term Prospective Comparative Analysis of Ototoxic and Survival Outcomes of Sequential Boost and Simultaneous Integrated Boost of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Head-Neck Carcinomas

Objective: To compare the ototoxicity and survival in head and neck carcinoma patients treated with sequential (SEQ) and simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Methods: This long-term prospective study enrolled patients with histologically confirmed head and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nidhin Das, Sri Harsha Kombathula, Vidhu Sharma, Puneet Pareek, Kapil Soni, Amit Goyal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Galenos Yayincilik 2024-09-01
Series:Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.turkarchotolaryngol.net/articles/long-term-prospective-comparative-analysis-of-ototoxic-and-survival-outcomes-of-sequential-boost-and-simultaneous-integrated-boost-of-volumetric-modulated-arc-therapy-for-head-neck-carcinomas/doi/tao.2024.2023-10-10
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841537412934664192
author Nidhin Das
Sri Harsha Kombathula
Vidhu Sharma
Puneet Pareek
Kapil Soni
Amit Goyal
author_facet Nidhin Das
Sri Harsha Kombathula
Vidhu Sharma
Puneet Pareek
Kapil Soni
Amit Goyal
author_sort Nidhin Das
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To compare the ototoxicity and survival in head and neck carcinoma patients treated with sequential (SEQ) and simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Methods: This long-term prospective study enrolled patients with histologically confirmed head and neck carcinoma, all receiving VMAT treatment. Audiological assessments were done using various tests at baseline, two weeks, treatment completion, six months, and 12 months. The changes in bone conduction pure tone thresholds were correlated with cochlear dose, comparing SEQ and SIB plans. We also investigated other significant late toxicities that led to dysphagia, voice changes, and xerostomia. Survival was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: The study included 93 patients (186 ears), 40 receiving radiation alone and 53 undergoing chemoradiation. Baseline hearing levels for the right and left ears were 13.3±2.3 dB and 14.2±1.5 dB. After 12 months of radiation, levels were 18.5±2.4 dB and 19.11±1.9 dB, respectively. No significant changes were observed between SEQ and SIB plans, but high-frequency shifts occurred. The cochlea tolerated up to 28 Gy without hearing loss in the radiation-alone group but showed loss at 9 Gy when combined with cisplatin chemotherapy. The maximum dose (Dmax) and the mean dose (Dmean) of pharyngeal constrictor muscles predicted dysphagia. No significant SEQ vs. SIB differences were found in late toxicity or survival outcomes. Conclusion: Modern radiotherapy techniques like VMAT adhere to cochlear dose limits. No significant differences were found between SEQ and SIB plans in sensorineural hearing loss, late toxicity, or survival, making both suitable for head and neck carcinoma treatment.
format Article
id doaj-art-d7a2ce6e08d2467c985bbd2738ae1e7b
institution Kabale University
issn 2667-7474
language English
publishDate 2024-09-01
publisher Galenos Yayincilik
record_format Article
series Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
spelling doaj-art-d7a2ce6e08d2467c985bbd2738ae1e7b2025-01-14T08:38:09ZengGalenos YayincilikTurkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology2667-74742024-09-0162310111210.4274/tao.2024.2023-10-10Long-term Prospective Comparative Analysis of Ototoxic and Survival Outcomes of Sequential Boost and Simultaneous Integrated Boost of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Head-Neck CarcinomasNidhin Das0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7109-8477Sri Harsha Kombathula1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4981-1114Vidhu Sharma2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3547-2329Puneet Pareek3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6055-9872Kapil Soni4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3586-6213Amit Goyal5https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4339-7541All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, IndiaConsultant Clinical Oncologist Ipswich Hospital, Ipswich, United KingdomAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, IndiaAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Department of Radiation Oncology, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, IndiaAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, IndiaAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, IndiaObjective: To compare the ototoxicity and survival in head and neck carcinoma patients treated with sequential (SEQ) and simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Methods: This long-term prospective study enrolled patients with histologically confirmed head and neck carcinoma, all receiving VMAT treatment. Audiological assessments were done using various tests at baseline, two weeks, treatment completion, six months, and 12 months. The changes in bone conduction pure tone thresholds were correlated with cochlear dose, comparing SEQ and SIB plans. We also investigated other significant late toxicities that led to dysphagia, voice changes, and xerostomia. Survival was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: The study included 93 patients (186 ears), 40 receiving radiation alone and 53 undergoing chemoradiation. Baseline hearing levels for the right and left ears were 13.3±2.3 dB and 14.2±1.5 dB. After 12 months of radiation, levels were 18.5±2.4 dB and 19.11±1.9 dB, respectively. No significant changes were observed between SEQ and SIB plans, but high-frequency shifts occurred. The cochlea tolerated up to 28 Gy without hearing loss in the radiation-alone group but showed loss at 9 Gy when combined with cisplatin chemotherapy. The maximum dose (Dmax) and the mean dose (Dmean) of pharyngeal constrictor muscles predicted dysphagia. No significant SEQ vs. SIB differences were found in late toxicity or survival outcomes. Conclusion: Modern radiotherapy techniques like VMAT adhere to cochlear dose limits. No significant differences were found between SEQ and SIB plans in sensorineural hearing loss, late toxicity, or survival, making both suitable for head and neck carcinoma treatment.https://www.turkarchotolaryngol.net/articles/long-term-prospective-comparative-analysis-of-ototoxic-and-survival-outcomes-of-sequential-boost-and-simultaneous-integrated-boost-of-volumetric-modulated-arc-therapy-for-head-neck-carcinomas/doi/tao.2024.2023-10-10head and neck cancervolumetric-modulated arc therapyradiotherapy dose fractionationototoxicitysensorineural hearing losssurvival analysis
spellingShingle Nidhin Das
Sri Harsha Kombathula
Vidhu Sharma
Puneet Pareek
Kapil Soni
Amit Goyal
Long-term Prospective Comparative Analysis of Ototoxic and Survival Outcomes of Sequential Boost and Simultaneous Integrated Boost of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Head-Neck Carcinomas
Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
head and neck cancer
volumetric-modulated arc therapy
radiotherapy dose fractionation
ototoxicity
sensorineural hearing loss
survival analysis
title Long-term Prospective Comparative Analysis of Ototoxic and Survival Outcomes of Sequential Boost and Simultaneous Integrated Boost of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Head-Neck Carcinomas
title_full Long-term Prospective Comparative Analysis of Ototoxic and Survival Outcomes of Sequential Boost and Simultaneous Integrated Boost of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Head-Neck Carcinomas
title_fullStr Long-term Prospective Comparative Analysis of Ototoxic and Survival Outcomes of Sequential Boost and Simultaneous Integrated Boost of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Head-Neck Carcinomas
title_full_unstemmed Long-term Prospective Comparative Analysis of Ototoxic and Survival Outcomes of Sequential Boost and Simultaneous Integrated Boost of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Head-Neck Carcinomas
title_short Long-term Prospective Comparative Analysis of Ototoxic and Survival Outcomes of Sequential Boost and Simultaneous Integrated Boost of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Head-Neck Carcinomas
title_sort long term prospective comparative analysis of ototoxic and survival outcomes of sequential boost and simultaneous integrated boost of volumetric modulated arc therapy for head neck carcinomas
topic head and neck cancer
volumetric-modulated arc therapy
radiotherapy dose fractionation
ototoxicity
sensorineural hearing loss
survival analysis
url https://www.turkarchotolaryngol.net/articles/long-term-prospective-comparative-analysis-of-ototoxic-and-survival-outcomes-of-sequential-boost-and-simultaneous-integrated-boost-of-volumetric-modulated-arc-therapy-for-head-neck-carcinomas/doi/tao.2024.2023-10-10
work_keys_str_mv AT nidhindas longtermprospectivecomparativeanalysisofototoxicandsurvivaloutcomesofsequentialboostandsimultaneousintegratedboostofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforheadneckcarcinomas
AT sriharshakombathula longtermprospectivecomparativeanalysisofototoxicandsurvivaloutcomesofsequentialboostandsimultaneousintegratedboostofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforheadneckcarcinomas
AT vidhusharma longtermprospectivecomparativeanalysisofototoxicandsurvivaloutcomesofsequentialboostandsimultaneousintegratedboostofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforheadneckcarcinomas
AT puneetpareek longtermprospectivecomparativeanalysisofototoxicandsurvivaloutcomesofsequentialboostandsimultaneousintegratedboostofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforheadneckcarcinomas
AT kapilsoni longtermprospectivecomparativeanalysisofototoxicandsurvivaloutcomesofsequentialboostandsimultaneousintegratedboostofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforheadneckcarcinomas
AT amitgoyal longtermprospectivecomparativeanalysisofototoxicandsurvivaloutcomesofsequentialboostandsimultaneousintegratedboostofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyforheadneckcarcinomas