Random mechanisms govern bacterial succession in bioinoculated beet plants

Abstract Plant colonization by microbes is an example of succession, with its distinct phases differing in community structure and diversity. This process needs to be studied to improve bioinoculation strategies. Here, we show that, regardless of bioinoculation, soil type and plant genotype, bacteri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marcin Gołębiewski, Marcin Sikora, Justyna Mazur, Sonia Szymańska, Jarosław Tyburski, Katarzyna Hrynkiewicz, Werner Ulrich
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-03-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92688-0
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849390977018494976
author Marcin Gołębiewski
Marcin Sikora
Justyna Mazur
Sonia Szymańska
Jarosław Tyburski
Katarzyna Hrynkiewicz
Werner Ulrich
author_facet Marcin Gołębiewski
Marcin Sikora
Justyna Mazur
Sonia Szymańska
Jarosław Tyburski
Katarzyna Hrynkiewicz
Werner Ulrich
author_sort Marcin Gołębiewski
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Plant colonization by microbes is an example of succession, with its distinct phases differing in community structure and diversity. This process needs to be studied to improve bioinoculation strategies. Here, we show that, regardless of bioinoculation, soil type and plant genotype, bacteria colonize the rhizosphere and tissues of axenic beets in two phases associated with taproot development. Communities remained stable after five weeks of growth in soil. Time, soil type and genotype determined community structure both in the rhizosphere and in the endosphere. Inoculation changed the community structure, and members of Pseudomonadota and Bacillota were recruited by beets. Axenic beet colonization runs through phases similar to colonization of a glacier forefront, and bacteria are recruited mostly randomly. The transition from the early to late phase involves a decrease in the bacterial load in plant tissues, which may be linked to plant growth and the arrest of bacterial cell division. Therefore, early inoculation seems to be favourable. Five weeks of growth in soil enabled formation of stable bacterial communities in both the rhizosphere and the endosphere. The influence of inoculation seems to be indirect, probably due to microbe-microbe interactions.
format Article
id doaj-art-d7298de1ab4f44f2b60be2a2f23f91b5
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-d7298de1ab4f44f2b60be2a2f23f91b52025-08-20T03:41:14ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-03-0115111710.1038/s41598-025-92688-0Random mechanisms govern bacterial succession in bioinoculated beet plantsMarcin Gołębiewski0Marcin Sikora1Justyna Mazur2Sonia Szymańska3Jarosław Tyburski4Katarzyna Hrynkiewicz5Werner Ulrich6Department of Plant Physiology and Biotechnology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in TorunCentre for Modern Interdisciplinary Technologies, Nicolaus Copernicus University in TorunCentre for Modern Interdisciplinary Technologies, Nicolaus Copernicus University in TorunDepartment of Microbiology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in TorunDepartment of Plant Physiology and Biotechnology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in TorunDepartment of Microbiology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in TorunDepartment of Ecology and Biogeography, Nicolaus Copernicus University in TorunAbstract Plant colonization by microbes is an example of succession, with its distinct phases differing in community structure and diversity. This process needs to be studied to improve bioinoculation strategies. Here, we show that, regardless of bioinoculation, soil type and plant genotype, bacteria colonize the rhizosphere and tissues of axenic beets in two phases associated with taproot development. Communities remained stable after five weeks of growth in soil. Time, soil type and genotype determined community structure both in the rhizosphere and in the endosphere. Inoculation changed the community structure, and members of Pseudomonadota and Bacillota were recruited by beets. Axenic beet colonization runs through phases similar to colonization of a glacier forefront, and bacteria are recruited mostly randomly. The transition from the early to late phase involves a decrease in the bacterial load in plant tissues, which may be linked to plant growth and the arrest of bacterial cell division. Therefore, early inoculation seems to be favourable. Five weeks of growth in soil enabled formation of stable bacterial communities in both the rhizosphere and the endosphere. The influence of inoculation seems to be indirect, probably due to microbe-microbe interactions.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92688-0Endophytic bacterial community16S rRNA sequencingBioinoculantCommunity assemblyBeta vulgarisRhizosphere
spellingShingle Marcin Gołębiewski
Marcin Sikora
Justyna Mazur
Sonia Szymańska
Jarosław Tyburski
Katarzyna Hrynkiewicz
Werner Ulrich
Random mechanisms govern bacterial succession in bioinoculated beet plants
Scientific Reports
Endophytic bacterial community
16S rRNA sequencing
Bioinoculant
Community assembly
Beta vulgaris
Rhizosphere
title Random mechanisms govern bacterial succession in bioinoculated beet plants
title_full Random mechanisms govern bacterial succession in bioinoculated beet plants
title_fullStr Random mechanisms govern bacterial succession in bioinoculated beet plants
title_full_unstemmed Random mechanisms govern bacterial succession in bioinoculated beet plants
title_short Random mechanisms govern bacterial succession in bioinoculated beet plants
title_sort random mechanisms govern bacterial succession in bioinoculated beet plants
topic Endophytic bacterial community
16S rRNA sequencing
Bioinoculant
Community assembly
Beta vulgaris
Rhizosphere
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92688-0
work_keys_str_mv AT marcingołebiewski randommechanismsgovernbacterialsuccessioninbioinoculatedbeetplants
AT marcinsikora randommechanismsgovernbacterialsuccessioninbioinoculatedbeetplants
AT justynamazur randommechanismsgovernbacterialsuccessioninbioinoculatedbeetplants
AT soniaszymanska randommechanismsgovernbacterialsuccessioninbioinoculatedbeetplants
AT jarosławtyburski randommechanismsgovernbacterialsuccessioninbioinoculatedbeetplants
AT katarzynahrynkiewicz randommechanismsgovernbacterialsuccessioninbioinoculatedbeetplants
AT wernerulrich randommechanismsgovernbacterialsuccessioninbioinoculatedbeetplants