The “Ambiguous Sex”: Cross-dressing heroines in Sensation and New Woman fiction
As exemplified by Louisa May Alcott’s “Behind a Mask” (1866), Sensation fiction is a genre preoccupied with questioning notions of Victorian femininity. However, while heroines like Jean Muir have the power to use their feminine identity to suit their own intentions, other Sensation novels, includin...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Laboratoire d’Etudes et de Recherches sur le Monde Anglophone (LERMA)
2019-06-01
|
| Series: | E-REA |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/erea/7561 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841552711784333312 |
|---|---|
| author | Katherine MANSFIELD |
| author_facet | Katherine MANSFIELD |
| author_sort | Katherine MANSFIELD |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | As exemplified by Louisa May Alcott’s “Behind a Mask” (1866), Sensation fiction is a genre preoccupied with questioning notions of Victorian femininity. However, while heroines like Jean Muir have the power to use their feminine identity to suit their own intentions, other Sensation novels, including Albert Eubule Evans’ Revealed at Last (1873), challenge assumptions regarding the inherent binary of gender through their use of cross-dressing heroines. Anticipated by Evans’ portrayal of his cross-dressing heroine, New Woman novels such as Lady Florence Dixie’s Gloriana; or, the Revolution of 1900 (1890) and George Moore’s “Albert Nobbs” (1927) also contested the contemporary conviction that gender was inseparable from anatomical sex, and that masculinity and femininity were two distinct categories. However, unlike Evans’ novel where the ability to alter one’s gender is based on a performance of masculinity, Dixie and Moore suggest that masculinity is biologically inherent in women. By focusing on the figure of the cross-dresser in Florence Marryat’s Her Father’s Name (1876) and Sarah Grand’s The Heavenly Twins (1893), this essay challenges twentieth-century mis-readings of nineteenth-century gender theory, specifically the two-sex model Thomas Laqueur in Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud (1990) identifies as holding precedence in the Victorian period. This essay argues that Laqueur disregards the forward-thinking narratives of Sensation and New Woman fiction in which ideas about women and gender are radically challenged. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d675391ec4f24eb6b42701a8ed8d9fb9 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1638-1718 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2019-06-01 |
| publisher | Laboratoire d’Etudes et de Recherches sur le Monde Anglophone (LERMA) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | E-REA |
| spelling | doaj-art-d675391ec4f24eb6b42701a8ed8d9fb92025-01-09T12:52:52ZengLaboratoire d’Etudes et de Recherches sur le Monde Anglophone (LERMA)E-REA1638-17182019-06-0116210.4000/erea.7561The “Ambiguous Sex”: Cross-dressing heroines in Sensation and New Woman fictionKatherine MANSFIELDAs exemplified by Louisa May Alcott’s “Behind a Mask” (1866), Sensation fiction is a genre preoccupied with questioning notions of Victorian femininity. However, while heroines like Jean Muir have the power to use their feminine identity to suit their own intentions, other Sensation novels, including Albert Eubule Evans’ Revealed at Last (1873), challenge assumptions regarding the inherent binary of gender through their use of cross-dressing heroines. Anticipated by Evans’ portrayal of his cross-dressing heroine, New Woman novels such as Lady Florence Dixie’s Gloriana; or, the Revolution of 1900 (1890) and George Moore’s “Albert Nobbs” (1927) also contested the contemporary conviction that gender was inseparable from anatomical sex, and that masculinity and femininity were two distinct categories. However, unlike Evans’ novel where the ability to alter one’s gender is based on a performance of masculinity, Dixie and Moore suggest that masculinity is biologically inherent in women. By focusing on the figure of the cross-dresser in Florence Marryat’s Her Father’s Name (1876) and Sarah Grand’s The Heavenly Twins (1893), this essay challenges twentieth-century mis-readings of nineteenth-century gender theory, specifically the two-sex model Thomas Laqueur in Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud (1990) identifies as holding precedence in the Victorian period. This essay argues that Laqueur disregards the forward-thinking narratives of Sensation and New Woman fiction in which ideas about women and gender are radically challenged.https://journals.openedition.org/erea/7561gendercross-dressingperformanceNew WomanSensation fictiontwo-sex |
| spellingShingle | Katherine MANSFIELD The “Ambiguous Sex”: Cross-dressing heroines in Sensation and New Woman fiction E-REA gender cross-dressing performance New Woman Sensation fiction two-sex |
| title | The “Ambiguous Sex”: Cross-dressing heroines in Sensation and New Woman fiction |
| title_full | The “Ambiguous Sex”: Cross-dressing heroines in Sensation and New Woman fiction |
| title_fullStr | The “Ambiguous Sex”: Cross-dressing heroines in Sensation and New Woman fiction |
| title_full_unstemmed | The “Ambiguous Sex”: Cross-dressing heroines in Sensation and New Woman fiction |
| title_short | The “Ambiguous Sex”: Cross-dressing heroines in Sensation and New Woman fiction |
| title_sort | ambiguous sex cross dressing heroines in sensation and new woman fiction |
| topic | gender cross-dressing performance New Woman Sensation fiction two-sex |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/erea/7561 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT katherinemansfield theambiguoussexcrossdressingheroinesinsensationandnewwomanfiction AT katherinemansfield ambiguoussexcrossdressingheroinesinsensationandnewwomanfiction |