Effects of course‐based undergraduate research experiences (CURE) on wildlife students

ABSTRACT A new movement to develop course‐based undergraduate research experiences (CURE) is emerging, although the benefits of such programs have not yet been fully evaluated. We examined effects of a field‐based CURE project on science attitudes, career choice, and perceived knowledge of undergrad...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elizabeth A. Flaherty, Sarah M. Walker, Jennifer H. Forrester, Merav Ben‐David
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017-12-01
Series:Wildlife Society Bulletin
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.810
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846120173225902080
author Elizabeth A. Flaherty
Sarah M. Walker
Jennifer H. Forrester
Merav Ben‐David
author_facet Elizabeth A. Flaherty
Sarah M. Walker
Jennifer H. Forrester
Merav Ben‐David
author_sort Elizabeth A. Flaherty
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT A new movement to develop course‐based undergraduate research experiences (CURE) is emerging, although the benefits of such programs have not yet been fully evaluated. We examined effects of a field‐based CURE project on science attitudes, career choice, and perceived knowledge of undergraduate wildlife students (n = 32) at the University of Wyoming in 2012. In this project, junior and senior students gained practical experience, used their own data to learn various modeling approaches, and disseminated results orally and in written form. We used a mixed‐method study with pre‐ and postactivity surveys and focus group interviews to evaluate the change in student perceptions. Our results illustrate that participation in the CURE project resulted in benefits similar to those reported from traditional undergraduate research experience programs. Participants reported increased understanding of the scientific method, clarification of their career choices, and greater confidence in their perceived knowledge of science. These changes were more pronounced among male participants. Concurrently students gained valuable skills that are required by practicing wildlife biologists. Based on these results it appears that adoption of CURE projects in similar natural resources programs could provide a large number of undergraduate students with equivalent opportunities to those currently experienced by a select few through traditional undergraduate research experience programs. © 2017 The Wildlife Society.
format Article
id doaj-art-d62fba9a273e4961b3171446a33c7593
institution Kabale University
issn 2328-5540
language English
publishDate 2017-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Wildlife Society Bulletin
spelling doaj-art-d62fba9a273e4961b3171446a33c75932024-12-16T13:00:44ZengWileyWildlife Society Bulletin2328-55402017-12-0141470171110.1002/wsb.810Effects of course‐based undergraduate research experiences (CURE) on wildlife studentsElizabeth A. Flaherty0Sarah M. Walker1Jennifer H. Forrester2Merav Ben‐David3Department of Forestry and Natural ResourcesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteIN47907USAScience and Math Teaching CenterUniversity of Wyoming1000 University Avenue, Department 3992LaramieWY82071USADepartment of Elementary and Early Childhood EducationUniversity of Wyoming125 College DriveCasperWY82601USADepartment of Zoology and Physiology and Program in EcologyUniversity of Wyoming1000 University Avenue, Department 3166LaramieWY82071USAABSTRACT A new movement to develop course‐based undergraduate research experiences (CURE) is emerging, although the benefits of such programs have not yet been fully evaluated. We examined effects of a field‐based CURE project on science attitudes, career choice, and perceived knowledge of undergraduate wildlife students (n = 32) at the University of Wyoming in 2012. In this project, junior and senior students gained practical experience, used their own data to learn various modeling approaches, and disseminated results orally and in written form. We used a mixed‐method study with pre‐ and postactivity surveys and focus group interviews to evaluate the change in student perceptions. Our results illustrate that participation in the CURE project resulted in benefits similar to those reported from traditional undergraduate research experience programs. Participants reported increased understanding of the scientific method, clarification of their career choices, and greater confidence in their perceived knowledge of science. These changes were more pronounced among male participants. Concurrently students gained valuable skills that are required by practicing wildlife biologists. Based on these results it appears that adoption of CURE projects in similar natural resources programs could provide a large number of undergraduate students with equivalent opportunities to those currently experienced by a select few through traditional undergraduate research experience programs. © 2017 The Wildlife Society.https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.810career choiceleast chipmunkperceived knowledgeplace‐based educationproject‐based learningscience attitudes
spellingShingle Elizabeth A. Flaherty
Sarah M. Walker
Jennifer H. Forrester
Merav Ben‐David
Effects of course‐based undergraduate research experiences (CURE) on wildlife students
Wildlife Society Bulletin
career choice
least chipmunk
perceived knowledge
place‐based education
project‐based learning
science attitudes
title Effects of course‐based undergraduate research experiences (CURE) on wildlife students
title_full Effects of course‐based undergraduate research experiences (CURE) on wildlife students
title_fullStr Effects of course‐based undergraduate research experiences (CURE) on wildlife students
title_full_unstemmed Effects of course‐based undergraduate research experiences (CURE) on wildlife students
title_short Effects of course‐based undergraduate research experiences (CURE) on wildlife students
title_sort effects of course based undergraduate research experiences cure on wildlife students
topic career choice
least chipmunk
perceived knowledge
place‐based education
project‐based learning
science attitudes
url https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.810
work_keys_str_mv AT elizabethaflaherty effectsofcoursebasedundergraduateresearchexperiencescureonwildlifestudents
AT sarahmwalker effectsofcoursebasedundergraduateresearchexperiencescureonwildlifestudents
AT jenniferhforrester effectsofcoursebasedundergraduateresearchexperiencescureonwildlifestudents
AT meravbendavid effectsofcoursebasedundergraduateresearchexperiencescureonwildlifestudents