Fleshing out the data: when epidemiological researchers engage with patients and carers. Learning lessons from a patient involvement activity

Patient and public involvement and engagement has become an essential element of health research, ensuring aims and outputs are worthwhile and relevant. However, research involving secondary data analyses does not present immediately obvious ways to involve patients and the public. Innovative approa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bernard Rachet, Melanie Morris, Michel P Coleman, Richard Stephens, Yuki Alencar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-09-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e036311.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846098815611830272
author Bernard Rachet
Melanie Morris
Michel P Coleman
Richard Stephens
Yuki Alencar
author_facet Bernard Rachet
Melanie Morris
Michel P Coleman
Richard Stephens
Yuki Alencar
author_sort Bernard Rachet
collection DOAJ
description Patient and public involvement and engagement has become an essential element of health research, ensuring aims and outputs are worthwhile and relevant. However, research involving secondary data analyses does not present immediately obvious ways to involve patients and the public. Innovative approaches to ensure their involvement is meaningful and effective are required.The Cancer Survival Group cohosted a full-day meeting with the National Cancer Research Institute Consumer Forum—a group of patients and carers. This included the Forum’s ‘Dragons’ Den’: a small-group session in which their members provided insight, advice and ideas on current or planned research in the Cancer Survival Group.We investigated this activity as an example of effective patient involvement, with the aim of developing broad recommendations to improve epidemiological/quantitative research by involving patients and carers as directly as possible.In addition to quantitative data captured through evaluation forms completed after the event, we used semistructured interviews of a sample of participants to evaluate the effectiveness of the session and to learn lessons. The interviews were analysed to identify broad or recurrent themes and recommendations.Feedback was overwhelmingly positive, and some impacts on the research projects were identified. Interviewees commented on overall expectations and experiences, as well as specifics of room layout, timing of the session, composition of groups, effectiveness of the facilitation and content of discussions.We present a summary of our findings as a guide for other researchers, including recommendations for improvement gleaned from the interviews. The value to researchers of hosting and participating in such activities was clear. We developed recommendations that should help to improve future events for ourselves and for others who wish to conduct similar activities, which in turn may lead to more concrete benefits for research and patients.
format Article
id doaj-art-d5afcedd6f8049fdbf52937cccf5e9b5
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-d5afcedd6f8049fdbf52937cccf5e9b52025-01-01T11:30:13ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552020-09-0110910.1136/bmjopen-2019-036311Fleshing out the data: when epidemiological researchers engage with patients and carers. Learning lessons from a patient involvement activityBernard Rachet0Melanie Morris1Michel P Coleman2Richard Stephens3Yuki Alencar4Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK3University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States of America1 Cancer Survival Group, Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London, UKNational Cancer Research Institute Consumer Forum, London, UKDepartment of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UKPatient and public involvement and engagement has become an essential element of health research, ensuring aims and outputs are worthwhile and relevant. However, research involving secondary data analyses does not present immediately obvious ways to involve patients and the public. Innovative approaches to ensure their involvement is meaningful and effective are required.The Cancer Survival Group cohosted a full-day meeting with the National Cancer Research Institute Consumer Forum—a group of patients and carers. This included the Forum’s ‘Dragons’ Den’: a small-group session in which their members provided insight, advice and ideas on current or planned research in the Cancer Survival Group.We investigated this activity as an example of effective patient involvement, with the aim of developing broad recommendations to improve epidemiological/quantitative research by involving patients and carers as directly as possible.In addition to quantitative data captured through evaluation forms completed after the event, we used semistructured interviews of a sample of participants to evaluate the effectiveness of the session and to learn lessons. The interviews were analysed to identify broad or recurrent themes and recommendations.Feedback was overwhelmingly positive, and some impacts on the research projects were identified. Interviewees commented on overall expectations and experiences, as well as specifics of room layout, timing of the session, composition of groups, effectiveness of the facilitation and content of discussions.We present a summary of our findings as a guide for other researchers, including recommendations for improvement gleaned from the interviews. The value to researchers of hosting and participating in such activities was clear. We developed recommendations that should help to improve future events for ourselves and for others who wish to conduct similar activities, which in turn may lead to more concrete benefits for research and patients.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e036311.full
spellingShingle Bernard Rachet
Melanie Morris
Michel P Coleman
Richard Stephens
Yuki Alencar
Fleshing out the data: when epidemiological researchers engage with patients and carers. Learning lessons from a patient involvement activity
BMJ Open
title Fleshing out the data: when epidemiological researchers engage with patients and carers. Learning lessons from a patient involvement activity
title_full Fleshing out the data: when epidemiological researchers engage with patients and carers. Learning lessons from a patient involvement activity
title_fullStr Fleshing out the data: when epidemiological researchers engage with patients and carers. Learning lessons from a patient involvement activity
title_full_unstemmed Fleshing out the data: when epidemiological researchers engage with patients and carers. Learning lessons from a patient involvement activity
title_short Fleshing out the data: when epidemiological researchers engage with patients and carers. Learning lessons from a patient involvement activity
title_sort fleshing out the data when epidemiological researchers engage with patients and carers learning lessons from a patient involvement activity
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e036311.full
work_keys_str_mv AT bernardrachet fleshingoutthedatawhenepidemiologicalresearchersengagewithpatientsandcarerslearninglessonsfromapatientinvolvementactivity
AT melaniemorris fleshingoutthedatawhenepidemiologicalresearchersengagewithpatientsandcarerslearninglessonsfromapatientinvolvementactivity
AT michelpcoleman fleshingoutthedatawhenepidemiologicalresearchersengagewithpatientsandcarerslearninglessonsfromapatientinvolvementactivity
AT richardstephens fleshingoutthedatawhenepidemiologicalresearchersengagewithpatientsandcarerslearninglessonsfromapatientinvolvementactivity
AT yukialencar fleshingoutthedatawhenepidemiologicalresearchersengagewithpatientsandcarerslearninglessonsfromapatientinvolvementactivity