The human responses and nursing diagnoses of head and neck cancer patients: literature review and synthesis of evidence

Introduction: Head and neck cancer is relatively common with a high morbidity rate due to the anatomical sites that surround and may result in psychosocial, physical, or functional effects. Knowledge about the human responses and the corresponding nursing diagnoses of head and neck cancer patients u...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Susana Miguel, Cristina Mara Zamarioli, Emília Campos de Carvalho, Sílvia Caldeira
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Instituto de Ciências da Saúde 2019-01-01
Series:Cadernos de Saúde
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/cadernosdesaude/article/view/5274
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846146850143338496
author Susana Miguel
Cristina Mara Zamarioli
Emília Campos de Carvalho
Sílvia Caldeira
author_facet Susana Miguel
Cristina Mara Zamarioli
Emília Campos de Carvalho
Sílvia Caldeira
author_sort Susana Miguel
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Head and neck cancer is relatively common with a high morbidity rate due to the anatomical sites that surround and may result in psychosocial, physical, or functional effects. Knowledge about the human responses and the corresponding nursing diagnoses of head and neck cancer patients undergoing surgery, as listed on NANDA-I, seems scarce.  Aim: Review the literature on knowledge about the human responses and the corresponding nursing diagnoses of head and neck cancer patients undergoing surgery. Materials and Methods: Integrative literature review with a search on electronic databases: CINALH®, MEDLINE®, Nursing & Allied Health®, and Scopus®. Results: A total of 31 papers were included in this review and 72 human responses, categorized in 29 diagnoses. Most diagnoses are subjective, and the most frequent nursing diagnosis was disturbed body image.  Conclusion: Identifying the most frequent human responses of these patients facilitates nurses in providing adequate care and in developing further research aiming to improve diagnoses accuracy. Most diagnoses are subjective, and the clinical validation could improve the level of evidence and provide nurses with clinical indicators for clinical reasoning and effective planning and interventions. Particularly, differential validation is needed in these patients as similar diagnoses and confounding clinical indicators have been identified. Further research is needed to evaluate the subjective nursing diagnoses considering the similarity and specific defining characteristics in head and neck cancer.
format Article
id doaj-art-d50338f3a1f9463eb19a4633c21d0933
institution Kabale University
issn 1647-0559
language English
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Instituto de Ciências da Saúde
record_format Article
series Cadernos de Saúde
spelling doaj-art-d50338f3a1f9463eb19a4633c21d09332024-12-02T00:52:34ZengUniversidade Católica Portuguesa, Instituto de Ciências da SaúdeCadernos de Saúde1647-05592019-01-0111110.34632/cadernosdesaude.2019.5274The human responses and nursing diagnoses of head and neck cancer patients: literature review and synthesis of evidenceSusana MiguelCristina Mara ZamarioliEmília Campos de CarvalhoSílvia CaldeiraIntroduction: Head and neck cancer is relatively common with a high morbidity rate due to the anatomical sites that surround and may result in psychosocial, physical, or functional effects. Knowledge about the human responses and the corresponding nursing diagnoses of head and neck cancer patients undergoing surgery, as listed on NANDA-I, seems scarce.  Aim: Review the literature on knowledge about the human responses and the corresponding nursing diagnoses of head and neck cancer patients undergoing surgery. Materials and Methods: Integrative literature review with a search on electronic databases: CINALH®, MEDLINE®, Nursing & Allied Health®, and Scopus®. Results: A total of 31 papers were included in this review and 72 human responses, categorized in 29 diagnoses. Most diagnoses are subjective, and the most frequent nursing diagnosis was disturbed body image.  Conclusion: Identifying the most frequent human responses of these patients facilitates nurses in providing adequate care and in developing further research aiming to improve diagnoses accuracy. Most diagnoses are subjective, and the clinical validation could improve the level of evidence and provide nurses with clinical indicators for clinical reasoning and effective planning and interventions. Particularly, differential validation is needed in these patients as similar diagnoses and confounding clinical indicators have been identified. Further research is needed to evaluate the subjective nursing diagnoses considering the similarity and specific defining characteristics in head and neck cancer.https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/cadernosdesaude/article/view/5274nursing diagnosishead and neck cancerhuman responses
spellingShingle Susana Miguel
Cristina Mara Zamarioli
Emília Campos de Carvalho
Sílvia Caldeira
The human responses and nursing diagnoses of head and neck cancer patients: literature review and synthesis of evidence
Cadernos de Saúde
nursing diagnosis
head and neck cancer
human responses
title The human responses and nursing diagnoses of head and neck cancer patients: literature review and synthesis of evidence
title_full The human responses and nursing diagnoses of head and neck cancer patients: literature review and synthesis of evidence
title_fullStr The human responses and nursing diagnoses of head and neck cancer patients: literature review and synthesis of evidence
title_full_unstemmed The human responses and nursing diagnoses of head and neck cancer patients: literature review and synthesis of evidence
title_short The human responses and nursing diagnoses of head and neck cancer patients: literature review and synthesis of evidence
title_sort human responses and nursing diagnoses of head and neck cancer patients literature review and synthesis of evidence
topic nursing diagnosis
head and neck cancer
human responses
url https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/cadernosdesaude/article/view/5274
work_keys_str_mv AT susanamiguel thehumanresponsesandnursingdiagnosesofheadandneckcancerpatientsliteraturereviewandsynthesisofevidence
AT cristinamarazamarioli thehumanresponsesandnursingdiagnosesofheadandneckcancerpatientsliteraturereviewandsynthesisofevidence
AT emiliacamposdecarvalho thehumanresponsesandnursingdiagnosesofheadandneckcancerpatientsliteraturereviewandsynthesisofevidence
AT silviacaldeira thehumanresponsesandnursingdiagnosesofheadandneckcancerpatientsliteraturereviewandsynthesisofevidence
AT susanamiguel humanresponsesandnursingdiagnosesofheadandneckcancerpatientsliteraturereviewandsynthesisofevidence
AT cristinamarazamarioli humanresponsesandnursingdiagnosesofheadandneckcancerpatientsliteraturereviewandsynthesisofevidence
AT emiliacamposdecarvalho humanresponsesandnursingdiagnosesofheadandneckcancerpatientsliteraturereviewandsynthesisofevidence
AT silviacaldeira humanresponsesandnursingdiagnosesofheadandneckcancerpatientsliteraturereviewandsynthesisofevidence