Cross-Border Data Flows and the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 – Part II: The Data Transfer Provision

The Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 (POPIA) was introduced to protect the right to privacy of the South African data subject. The Act prescribes obligations that a responsible party must fulfil to achieve this purpose. However, personal information is very often collected and proce...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Juana Coetzee
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: North-West University 2024-11-01
Series:Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://perjournal.co.za/article/view/15234
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846169013784150016
author Juana Coetzee
author_facet Juana Coetzee
author_sort Juana Coetzee
collection DOAJ
description The Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 (POPIA) was introduced to protect the right to privacy of the South African data subject. The Act prescribes obligations that a responsible party must fulfil to achieve this purpose. However, personal information is very often collected and processed by responsible parties who are outside the Republic. Alternatively personal information is collected by a responsible party in the Republic and then transferred out of the country. Part I of this article discussed the territorial scope provision (section 3) and concluded that it can give rise to interpretative uncertainties with the result that personal information processed by responsible parties outside the Republic would not be covered by the Act. However, responsible parties often move their processing activities out of the country to escape liability. This part of the article analyses the data transfer provision (section 72), a provision that is directed at the regulation of the transfer of data outside the Republic. Section 72 lays down certain conditions before a responsible party can export data out of the Republic to a third party. The discussion will show that the provision has certain shortcomings which could limit its effectiveness in providing the necessary protection if compared to its counterpart in the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Consequently, legislative revision or clarification by the Information Regulator in the form of a Guidance Note would be welcomed. The article concludes with a brief analysis of the interplay between sections 3 and 72 to illustrate the need for both these provisions in our law.
format Article
id doaj-art-d4de41064d2d4ff2b72c65bbf3bef72d
institution Kabale University
issn 1727-3781
language Afrikaans
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher North-West University
record_format Article
series Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
spelling doaj-art-d4de41064d2d4ff2b72c65bbf3bef72d2024-11-13T08:25:55ZafrNorth-West UniversityPotchefstroom Electronic Law Journal1727-37812024-11-012710.17159/1727-3781/2024/v27i0a15234Cross-Border Data Flows and the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 – Part II: The Data Transfer ProvisionJuana Coetzee0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1388-4792Stellenbosch University The Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 (POPIA) was introduced to protect the right to privacy of the South African data subject. The Act prescribes obligations that a responsible party must fulfil to achieve this purpose. However, personal information is very often collected and processed by responsible parties who are outside the Republic. Alternatively personal information is collected by a responsible party in the Republic and then transferred out of the country. Part I of this article discussed the territorial scope provision (section 3) and concluded that it can give rise to interpretative uncertainties with the result that personal information processed by responsible parties outside the Republic would not be covered by the Act. However, responsible parties often move their processing activities out of the country to escape liability. This part of the article analyses the data transfer provision (section 72), a provision that is directed at the regulation of the transfer of data outside the Republic. Section 72 lays down certain conditions before a responsible party can export data out of the Republic to a third party. The discussion will show that the provision has certain shortcomings which could limit its effectiveness in providing the necessary protection if compared to its counterpart in the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Consequently, legislative revision or clarification by the Information Regulator in the form of a Guidance Note would be welcomed. The article concludes with a brief analysis of the interplay between sections 3 and 72 to illustrate the need for both these provisions in our law. https://perjournal.co.za/article/view/15234POPIA/POPIpersonal informationcross-border data transferssection 72 POPIA
spellingShingle Juana Coetzee
Cross-Border Data Flows and the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 – Part II: The Data Transfer Provision
Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
POPIA/POPI
personal information
cross-border data transfers
section 72 POPIA
title Cross-Border Data Flows and the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 – Part II: The Data Transfer Provision
title_full Cross-Border Data Flows and the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 – Part II: The Data Transfer Provision
title_fullStr Cross-Border Data Flows and the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 – Part II: The Data Transfer Provision
title_full_unstemmed Cross-Border Data Flows and the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 – Part II: The Data Transfer Provision
title_short Cross-Border Data Flows and the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 – Part II: The Data Transfer Provision
title_sort cross border data flows and the protection of personal information act 4 of 2013 part ii the data transfer provision
topic POPIA/POPI
personal information
cross-border data transfers
section 72 POPIA
url https://perjournal.co.za/article/view/15234
work_keys_str_mv AT juanacoetzee crossborderdataflowsandtheprotectionofpersonalinformationact4of2013partiithedatatransferprovision